Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
The time is now 9:41 am
You last visited September 1, 2014, 9:35 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Lotteries a threat to federal Web poker bill?

Topic closed. 182 replies. Last post 2 years ago by Lucky Loser.

Page 4 of 13
51
PrintE-mailLink
Lucky Loser's avatar - bucks
Texas
United States
Member #86155
January 30, 2010
1418 Posts
Offline
Posted: October 10, 2012, 9:07 pm - IP Logged

Maybe you have a point L.L.  After all it wasn't Obama that got Osama Bin Laden.  Thats is just a conspiracy theory.  It was his wife.  Now wait it was George W. Bush!  Oh wait, no that was Saddam Hussein.  My Bad.  No wait! Thats a conspiracy theory also. It was aliens from an interdimension. Or maybe it was Condeleeza Rice.  Or maybe it was Ridge!

  I see now why you cant debate with Ridge, he always takes the facts distorts them and then turns them into personal attacks.

My mother was right, never argue with a drunkard.  You cant win.  They get tunnel vision.

Just wait until they pass out, and then pee on them.

Mohammad Ali?  Was that one of those Al-Queda terrorists? No wait Al- queda is a conspiracy theory too!

So you are saying Obama was setting Romney up with a rope a dope?  More conspiracies!!!! ARRGHH!!!!

There is only one dope on this thread, let me tell you, and he has got a big beard.

Well, LB, you've learned a personal lesson pretty fast!! Just leave the debating to the candidates in question. Here's my personal view:

The world is the patient and was very, very sick WELL BEFORE the current doctor took the case. All sorts of "economic remedies and prescriptions" have been administered in their proper dosages. Now, we all know that medications cost money...and more money HAD to be FURTHER borrowed to implement the medicines and recovery therapies.

All sicknesses are recovery- dependent upon several things: the NATURE of the sickness, the EXTENT of the sickness, CONDITION of the body (immune system), strength of the medication, and the ATTENTIVENESS of the doctor towards a successful and full recovery. No sickness heals instantly I don't care how much the medicine costs, or, who the doctor may be. It takes time and the patient cannot be rushed to heal...won't happen. Healing is a slow process and the more damage there is, the longer it takes.

If there was absolutely NO HEALING, I'd say we have a serious problem. However, I can look at the patient's records (numbers) and factually see that healing is taking place everyday...just at a slow pace. Which is more acceptable? Slow healing or no healing? Some "vital organs" have already been saved within the patient's body, I might add. With healing currently taking place, the current doctor doesn't need to keep going over his remedies and prescriptions because they're working...just not as fast as some may like. Patience.

Now, if people want to debate the speediness of the recovery, that's beyond the doctor's control due to the factors already mentioned. Another doctor is claiming to magically be able to heal the same patient at a much faster rate without spending any more money on medication or therapy. Personally, I don't know if this doctor's method of healing will work because none of the medications, therapies, and treatments have been discussed in any detail. Furthermore, other doctors that have carefully examined what little information that was dissemminated have confirmed that it won't work, and, could quite possibly re-injure the patient.

Also, the doctor in question has a current history of just "giving up" on other "organs" and simply shipping them off to be healed elsewhere. A calm doctor is more attentive and efficient than an overly aggressive and uncaring one...although he may speak as though he's concerned about the patient. So, there you go. You have the doctors and the patient in question...and must decide if one get's the shot at either continued treatments, or, another one with a supposedly better and magically fast method of treating. It's on you.

L.L.

Consistently Affeering Simple Hits

Mathematical Oblectation Noegenisis  Exercitation  Yare

Parvenu Autarkic Impavid Delectatio

Paideutic Revie Officialism Factive Iwis Tendentious

Hebdomadally  Ichneutic Tempestive Synthesis

"I don't always Slangwhang but, when I do, 'they' deserve it."

Life = The Choices You Make + The Chances You Take + How Much You Stake

    rdgrnr's avatar - walt
    -Ridge Runner- Oracle of the Appalachians
    Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
    United States
    Member #73904
    April 28, 2009
    14903 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: October 10, 2012, 9:38 pm - IP Logged

    Well, LB, you've learned a personal lesson pretty fast!! Just leave the debating to the candidates in question. Here's my personal view:

    The world is the patient and was very, very sick WELL BEFORE the current doctor took the case. All sorts of "economic remedies and prescriptions" have been administered in their proper dosages. Now, we all know that medications cost money...and more money HAD to be FURTHER borrowed to implement the medicines and recovery therapies.

    All sicknesses are recovery- dependent upon several things: the NATURE of the sickness, the EXTENT of the sickness, CONDITION of the body (immune system), strength of the medication, and the ATTENTIVENESS of the doctor towards a successful and full recovery. No sickness heals instantly I don't care how much the medicine costs, or, who the doctor may be. It takes time and the patient cannot be rushed to heal...won't happen. Healing is a slow process and the more damage there is, the longer it takes.

    If there was absolutely NO HEALING, I'd say we have a serious problem. However, I can look at the patient's records (numbers) and factually see that healing is taking place everyday...just at a slow pace. Which is more acceptable? Slow healing or no healing? Some "vital organs" have already been saved within the patient's body, I might add. With healing currently taking place, the current doctor doesn't need to keep going over his remedies and prescriptions because they're working...just not as fast as some may like. Patience.

    Now, if people want to debate the speediness of the recovery, that's beyond the doctor's control due to the factors already mentioned. Another doctor is claiming to magically be able to heal the same patient at a much faster rate without spending any more money on medication or therapy. Personally, I don't know if this doctor's method of healing will work because none of the medications, therapies, and treatments have been discussed in any detail. Furthermore, other doctors that have carefully examined what little information that was dissemminated have confirmed that it won't work, and, could quite possibly re-injure the patient.

    Also, the doctor in question has a current history of just "giving up" on other "organs" and simply shipping them off to be healed elsewhere. A calm doctor is more attentive and efficient than an overly aggressive and uncaring one...although he may speak as though he's concerned about the patient. So, there you go. You have the doctors and the patient in question...and must decide if one get's the shot at either continued treatments, or, another one with a supposedly better and magically fast method of treating. It's on you.

    L.L.

    Good Lord, wouldn't it have been easier to just say you support Obama than to put us all through that? You could have helped them write a few thousand pages of Obamacare with a droning diatribe like that. I'm sure they're always looking for a few good windbags to produce further reams of mumbo-jumbo, so Nancy Pelosi can say we need to pass it now and read it later to see what's in it.

    And your doctor analogy didn't include the modality Obama is using on the patient right now → → Euthanasia.


                                                 
                         
                                             

     

     

     

     

                                                                                                       

    "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                --Edmund Burke

     

     

      Lucky Loser's avatar - bucks
      Texas
      United States
      Member #86155
      January 30, 2010
      1418 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: October 10, 2012, 9:54 pm - IP Logged

      Good Lord, wouldn't it have been easier to just say you support Obama than to put us all through that? You could have helped them write a few thousand pages of Obamacare with a droning diatribe like that. I'm sure they're always looking for a few good windbags to produce further reams of mumbo-jumbo, so Nancy Pelosi can say we need to pass it now and read it later to see what's in it.

      And your doctor analogy didn't include the modality Obama is using on the patient right now → → Euthanasia.

      Thanks, ridge. I appreciate your input and respect your views as well. A few posts back, no one said a word about how much detail you went into with discrediting the president on pretty much every issue. As such, you could've just said you support Gov. Romney and don't believe that Obama has accomplished nothing in your book. We both simply elaborated in our own ways.

       

      Euthanasia...I like that one. Take it easy and have a shot of Jack for me!

       

      L.L. 

      Consistently Affeering Simple Hits

      Mathematical Oblectation Noegenisis  Exercitation  Yare

      Parvenu Autarkic Impavid Delectatio

      Paideutic Revie Officialism Factive Iwis Tendentious

      Hebdomadally  Ichneutic Tempestive Synthesis

      "I don't always Slangwhang but, when I do, 'they' deserve it."

      Life = The Choices You Make + The Chances You Take + How Much You Stake

        Avatar
        Kentucky
        United States
        Member #32652
        February 14, 2006
        5409 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: October 10, 2012, 9:54 pm - IP Logged

        I've read the Platform before, Stack, and it's clear which way you will vote regardless of which way your state goes.

        So your lobbying for Obama here for my benefit wasn't necessary.

        But you knew that.

        And the "false rumor" didn't pertain to the plank being in the platform but rather if the plank in the Platform would carry any weight (which it won't).

        But you knew that too.

        But you got your "evidence" out there and that's what's important (to you).

        To keep the false rumor going anyway.

        Cuz you know there are always a few stupid people here, ripe for the taking.   

        The hell with the country. Me, me, me.

        "Lotteries a threat to federal Web poker bill?

        Who I'll vote for 5 or 6 times on November 6 has no relevance to this topic. 

        The Poker Players Alliance goal is to make it legal for U.S. poker players to deposit funds into an online account and play poker on the Internet in the privacy of their homes. If state lotteries offer online poker, the PPA has accomplished part of their goal, but Federal legislation is still the main goal because the lotteries will restrict their play to state residence.

        Even if the anti-Internet gambling plank in the National Republican Party platform is a useless waste of space paragraph, it's still a slap in the face to the millions of U.S. Poker players.

        "Cuz you know there are always a few stupid people here, ripe for the taking.

        I have no clue how many LP members played online poker for real money, but the conservative estimate before the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 was 10 million U.S. poker players. The last time I looked at the polls the race to 270 was close and it's possible the PPA in reporting the Republican Party plank in their August newsletter to their 3 million plus membership, swayed some undecided voters.

        "There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what." --- Mitt Romney

        It's obvious Romney knew the undecided voters will determine this election yet he allowed members of his own party to add a plank that could possibly cause his defeat.

        "The hell with the country. Me, me, me."

        People said the same thing when both the 18th and 21st Amendments were ratified and someone will always say it when their vote is in the minority. After the Great Depression, 15,761,841 people voted for Herbert Hoover. It's all part of the "Great Experiment" started in the late 18th century.

        Though it wasn't my intention by relaying factual information from the PPA to persuade someone's vote, it really doesn't matter because the First Amendment gives all of us that right.

          rdgrnr's avatar - walt
          -Ridge Runner- Oracle of the Appalachians
          Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
          United States
          Member #73904
          April 28, 2009
          14903 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: October 10, 2012, 10:20 pm - IP Logged

          Thanks, ridge. I appreciate your input and respect your views as well. A few posts back, no one said a word about how much detail you went into with discrediting the president on pretty much every issue. As such, you could've just said you support Gov. Romney and don't believe that Obama has accomplished nothing in your book. We both simply elaborated in our own ways.

           

          Euthanasia...I like that one. Take it easy and have a shot of Jack for me!

           

          L.L. 

          I've never hidden my political proclivities, everybody knows very well where I stand and I don't have to discredit the President because he does a great job of that all by himself. I can understand though, the embarrassment you must feel in supporting an abject failure like him. But if you really like those easy to get food stamps with no requirements, well, there's no getting around it, he's your man. And I hear those Hot Pockets are really good! None for me though, thanks, I'm watching my salt.

          And I'm not saying Obama hasn't accomplished anything in my book, he's accomplished plenty. He just hasn't accomplished anything that's good for the country. Everything he's accomplished has been bad for the country. And that's exactly the way he wanted it to be.

          Anybody who claims to love this country but votes for Obama is an insufferable moron because Obama is out to destroy this country.

          And thank God there are people who will put their own selfish personal interests aside for the good of the country and vote him out.

          Thank God for real American Patriots.


                                                       
                               
                                                   

           

           

           

           

                                                                                                             

          "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                      --Edmund Burke

           

           

            rdgrnr's avatar - walt
            -Ridge Runner- Oracle of the Appalachians
            Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
            United States
            Member #73904
            April 28, 2009
            14903 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: October 10, 2012, 10:38 pm - IP Logged

            "Lotteries a threat to federal Web poker bill?

            Who I'll vote for 5 or 6 times on November 6 has no relevance to this topic. 

            The Poker Players Alliance goal is to make it legal for U.S. poker players to deposit funds into an online account and play poker on the Internet in the privacy of their homes. If state lotteries offer online poker, the PPA has accomplished part of their goal, but Federal legislation is still the main goal because the lotteries will restrict their play to state residence.

            Even if the anti-Internet gambling plank in the National Republican Party platform is a useless waste of space paragraph, it's still a slap in the face to the millions of U.S. Poker players.

            "Cuz you know there are always a few stupid people here, ripe for the taking.

            I have no clue how many LP members played online poker for real money, but the conservative estimate before the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 was 10 million U.S. poker players. The last time I looked at the polls the race to 270 was close and it's possible the PPA in reporting the Republican Party plank in their August newsletter to their 3 million plus membership, swayed some undecided voters.

            "There are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what." --- Mitt Romney

            It's obvious Romney knew the undecided voters will determine this election yet he allowed members of his own party to add a plank that could possibly cause his defeat.

            "The hell with the country. Me, me, me."

            People said the same thing when both the 18th and 21st Amendments were ratified and someone will always say it when their vote is in the minority. After the Great Depression, 15,761,841 people voted for Herbert Hoover. It's all part of the "Great Experiment" started in the late 18th century.

            Though it wasn't my intention by relaying factual information from the PPA to persuade someone's vote, it really doesn't matter because the First Amendment gives all of us that right.

            Well Stack, you got your rhetoric and propaganda out there again. There's really no need to address it to me. Just give your speech.

            I'm sure there could be a few old card players with gambling problems like you here that you might influence, who knows?

            And maybe if your man Obama wins you'll get your wish of online poker, taxpayer funded abortions, Sodomite Marriage and a decimated military all in one bill. And a young liberal-activist Supreme Court to make sure nobody can ever change any of it.

            Good work buddy, keep at it.

            You're a great American.


                                                         
                                 
                                                     

             

             

             

             

                                                                                                               

            "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                        --Edmund Burke

             

             

              Lucky Loser's avatar - bucks
              Texas
              United States
              Member #86155
              January 30, 2010
              1418 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: October 10, 2012, 10:51 pm - IP Logged

              I've never hidden my political proclivities, everybody knows very well where I stand and I don't have to discredit the President because he does a great job of that all by himself. I can understand though, the embarrassment you must feel in supporting an abject failure like him. But if you really like those easy to get food stamps with no requirements, well, there's no getting around it, he's your man. And I hear those Hot Pockets are really good! None for me though, thanks, I'm watching my salt.

              And I'm not saying Obama hasn't accomplished anything in my book, he's accomplished plenty. He just hasn't accomplished anything that's good for the country. Everything he's accomplished has been bad for the country. And that's exactly the way he wanted it to be.

              Anybody who claims to love this country but votes for Obama is an insufferable moron because Obama is out to destroy this country.

              And thank God there are people who will put their own selfish personal interests aside for the good of the country and vote him out.

              Thank God for real American Patriots.

              Okay, I'll bite. The perfect combination would be Romney and Bush...hands down. Do you support this idea? If not, then why? Didn't Bush leave us with a $surplus$ and record low unemployment rate? Who was on the watch when 9/11 took place...and had forewarning of an imminent threat but played it down? Did they ever find those weapons of mass destruction in Baghdad? Why isn't anyone praising Bush for all his accomplishments if he did such a good job? This man was in office for (8) years, and NO ONE EVEN CARED TO HAVE HIM SPEAK AT THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION. 

              He wasn't even via satellite. He wasn't EVEN THERE. Rather, he had a smallish clip made. HIS DAD wasn't even there and they served as presidents back to back of each other. Help me to under all this because I know you have all the answers.

               

              L.L.

              Consistently Affeering Simple Hits

              Mathematical Oblectation Noegenisis  Exercitation  Yare

              Parvenu Autarkic Impavid Delectatio

              Paideutic Revie Officialism Factive Iwis Tendentious

              Hebdomadally  Ichneutic Tempestive Synthesis

              "I don't always Slangwhang but, when I do, 'they' deserve it."

              Life = The Choices You Make + The Chances You Take + How Much You Stake

                rdgrnr's avatar - walt
                -Ridge Runner- Oracle of the Appalachians
                Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
                United States
                Member #73904
                April 28, 2009
                14903 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:04 pm - IP Logged

                Okay, I'll bite. The perfect combination would be Romney and Bush...hands down. Do you support this idea? If not, then why? Didn't Bush leave us with a $surplus$ and record low unemployment rate? Who was on the watch when 9/11 took place...and had forewarning of an imminent threat but played it down? Did they ever find those weapons of mass destruction in Baghdad? Why isn't anyone praising Bush for all his accomplishments if he did such a good job? This man was in office for (8) years, and NO ONE EVEN CARED TO HAVE HIM SPEAK AT THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION. 

                He wasn't even via satellite. He wasn't EVEN THERE. Rather, he had a smallish clip made. HIS DAD wasn't even there and they served as presidents back to back of each other. Help me to under all this because I know you have all the answers.

                 

                L.L.

                "HIS DAD wasn't even there and they served as presidents back to back of each other. Help me to under all this because I know you have all the answers."

                Here's an answer for ya just for starters, son.

                You better do your homework if I have to school ya boy, cuz I'll take ya out to the woodshed, son. Copy?

                Blee dat.

                 

                 

                Ronald Reagan (1981-1989)George Bush (1981-1989)
                George Bush (1989-1993)Dan Quayle (1989-1993)
                Bill Clinton (1993-2001)Al Gore (1993-2001)
                George W. Bush (2001-2009)Dick Cheney (2001-2009)
                Barack Obama (2009-present)Joe Biden (2009-present)


                                                             
                                     
                                                         

                 

                 

                 

                 

                                                                                                                   

                "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                            --Edmund Burke

                 

                 

                  rdgrnr's avatar - walt
                  -Ridge Runner- Oracle of the Appalachians
                  Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
                  United States
                  Member #73904
                  April 28, 2009
                  14903 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:19 pm - IP Logged

                  Okay, I'll bite. The perfect combination would be Romney and Bush...hands down. Do you support this idea? If not, then why? Didn't Bush leave us with a $surplus$ and record low unemployment rate? Who was on the watch when 9/11 took place...and had forewarning of an imminent threat but played it down? Did they ever find those weapons of mass destruction in Baghdad? Why isn't anyone praising Bush for all his accomplishments if he did such a good job? This man was in office for (8) years, and NO ONE EVEN CARED TO HAVE HIM SPEAK AT THE REPUBLICAN CONVENTION. 

                  He wasn't even via satellite. He wasn't EVEN THERE. Rather, he had a smallish clip made. HIS DAD wasn't even there and they served as presidents back to back of each other. Help me to under all this because I know you have all the answers.

                   

                  L.L.

                  OK, Mr. Loser, I see you're cut from the same cloth as your lying weasel hero. How do I know? Cuz you're a lying, sniveling, weasel-like loser just like him.

                  Which means all you ever talk about is how everything bad that ever happens is Bush's fault and everything good that ever happens is Obama's success.

                  You don't have the character or self-respect to tell the truth about the man cuz you're a sniveling little slimy puke just like him. A real Texas Dandy. Loser is a good name for ya, I see why you chose it, it fits.

                  I don't need to hear all your whining and sniveling about WMD's and "Bush lied, people died" for the 6 millionth friggin' time. Put a lid on that garbage, junior.

                  Listen real close now, numbnuts: BUSH AIN'T RUNNIN' FOR OFFICE, YOU INSUFFERABLE MORON PUKE!!! 

                  Wake the f*** up, stupid!


                                                               
                                       
                                                           

                   

                   

                   

                   

                                                                                                                     

                  "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                              --Edmund Burke

                   

                   

                    sully16's avatar - sharan
                    Listens to the wind

                    United States
                    Member #81740
                    October 28, 2009
                    19278 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:19 pm - IP Logged

                    "HIS DAD wasn't even there and they served as presidents back to back of each other. Help me to under all this because I know you have all the answers."

                    Here's an answer for ya just for starters, son.

                    You better do your homework if I have to school ya boy, cuz I'll take ya out to the woodshed, son. Copy?

                    Blee dat.

                     

                     

                    Ronald Reagan (1981-1989)George Bush (1981-1989)
                    George Bush (1989-1993)Dan Quayle (1989-1993)
                    Bill Clinton (1993-2001)Al Gore (1993-2001)
                    George W. Bush (2001-2009)Dick Cheney (2001-2009)
                    Barack Obama (2009-present)Joe Biden (2009-present)

                    hehehehe, yep, you had the answer, wonder if it will sink in though.,

                    There's only one US Flag

                      rdgrnr's avatar - walt
                      -Ridge Runner- Oracle of the Appalachians
                      Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
                      United States
                      Member #73904
                      April 28, 2009
                      14903 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:26 pm - IP Logged

                      hehehehe, yep, you had the answer, wonder if it will sink in though.,

                      LOL, not a chance.

                      Mr. Loser is brainwashed to the bone.

                      If Saturday Night Live or Jon Stewart or Bill Maher tell him that the Bush's served back to back -- it's Gospel.

                      Loser was more entertaining when he used to talk about the hookers he got all the time and he even invited me to join him once or twice (I graciously declined).

                      Must be a real handsome guy.


                                                                   
                                           
                                                               

                       

                       

                       

                       

                                                                                                                         

                      "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                                  --Edmund Burke

                       

                       

                        sully16's avatar - sharan
                        Listens to the wind

                        United States
                        Member #81740
                        October 28, 2009
                        19278 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:39 pm - IP Logged

                        LOL, not a chance.

                        Mr. Loser is brainwashed to the bone.

                        If Saturday Night Live or Jon Stewart or Bill Maher tell him that the Bush's served back to back -- it's Gospel.

                        Loser was more entertaining when he used to talk about the hookers he got all the time and he even invited me to join him once or twice (I graciously declined).

                        Must be a real handsome guy.

                        Got a girl at work, hates Romney cause he's so corporate, she wants all the tax loop holes closed, I asked her, so, no more deducting the interest on your mortgage? no more deducting your kids, no child care credit?, I asked her if she had a 401k, yep, her and hubby, my next question, do you know what a 401k is? answer..., yep, the company saves her money and gives her interest. she is clueless.

                        There's only one US Flag

                          rdgrnr's avatar - walt
                          -Ridge Runner- Oracle of the Appalachians
                          Way back up in them dadgum hills, son!
                          United States
                          Member #73904
                          April 28, 2009
                          14903 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:48 pm - IP Logged

                          Got a girl at work, hates Romney cause he's so corporate, she wants all the tax loop holes closed, I asked her, so, no more deducting the interest on your mortgage? no more deducting your kids, no child care credit?, I asked her if she had a 401k, yep, her and hubby, my next question, do you know what a 401k is? answer..., yep, the company saves her money and gives her interest. she is clueless.

                          Hates him cuz he's so corporate, lol, good one.

                          Space -- The Final Frontier.


                                                                       
                                               
                                                                   

                           

                           

                           

                           

                                                                                                                             

                          "The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

                                                                                                                      --Edmund Burke

                           

                           


                            United States
                            Member #124498
                            March 14, 2012
                            7024 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:50 pm - IP Logged

                            I've never hidden my political proclivities, everybody knows very well where I stand and I don't have to discredit the President because he does a great job of that all by himself. I can understand though, the embarrassment you must feel in supporting an abject failure like him. But if you really like those easy to get food stamps with no requirements, well, there's no getting around it, he's your man. And I hear those Hot Pockets are really good! None for me though, thanks, I'm watching my salt.

                            And I'm not saying Obama hasn't accomplished anything in my book, he's accomplished plenty. He just hasn't accomplished anything that's good for the country. Everything he's accomplished has been bad for the country. And that's exactly the way he wanted it to be.

                            Anybody who claims to love this country but votes for Obama is an insufferable moron because Obama is out to destroy this country.

                            And thank God there are people who will put their own selfish personal interests aside for the good of the country and vote him out.

                            Thank God for real American Patriots.

                             And that's exactly the way he wanted it to be.

                            You know ridge this is a very naive statement.  I thought you had more wisdom than that.

                            Do you think the President really has any power any more?  Do you really think Obama makes policy? The last president that actually was showing some power  and creating some of his own policies was JFK and look what happened to him.  All presidents since JFK, more or less kowtow to the military industrial complex.  The real power real lies with the lobbyists and the bankers and corporations they represent.  War is good money!  You can bomb in the name of democracy.  Take the money, gold, and resources, and create a whole lot of resentment and new terrorists at the same time to continue the war on terror.  A never ending cycle.

                            You think Romney is any different?   The first thing on Romneys agenda will be to have pre-emptive attack on Iran.  Not because Romney wants to, but because of those pulling the strings.  You think the same masterminds of the 9-11 attacks are not still plotting?  You think they still dont lurk within the government? (And ridge you still never explainted WTC number 7).  Romney is already bought.  He wont live up to his claims as no president ever does.  They all run on the model of bait and switch.

                            And let me tell you the Iranians will not be afraid of Romney like Reagan.( like your farfetched claims), because romney never played a cowboy in hollywood, and Reagan was a bad ass scary ass cowboy.  I mean if i had hostages i would give them up too.  One look from the gipper and I would be like "Allah save us!"

                            All I can say is that Obama is a wolf in sheeps clothing.  And Romney will simply be the wolf.

                            Anybody who claims to love this country but votes for Obama is an insufferable moron because Obama is out to destroy this country.

                            Again, naivety.  Romney will be an even bigger puppet then Obama. And more dangerous for the security of the world, less alone the U.S., because Romney has already sold out.  Just look at his major contributors.  But you already know all this oh wise oracle.

                              sully16's avatar - sharan
                              Listens to the wind

                              United States
                              Member #81740
                              October 28, 2009
                              19278 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: October 10, 2012, 11:53 pm - IP Logged

                              Hates him cuz he's so corporate, lol, good one.

                              Space -- The Final Frontier.

                              LOL, They'll screw that up so bad, the aliens will give us the boot and put a force field around the planet, so we can't escape.

                              There's only one US Flag

                                 
                                Page 4 of 13