Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )

Quick Links

USA Mega Lottery Results Gadget for Windows Vista

NetConnect

Internet Domains, simple and cheap

Find a domain name:

  Home

Petition for True Lottery DrawingsMegaplier Petition
You last visited July 6, 2009, 12:47 am

Man wins share of ex's lotto prize

Aug. 20, 2004, 7:00 a.m.

Insider Buzz Insider Buzz: Man wins share of ex's lotto prize
  • E-mail to a friend
  • Printer-friendly
  • Link to this story
  • Bookmark and Share

A Newfoundland man has won a legal battle with his former live-in lover for half of what's left of a $700,000 lottery prize.

A Newfoundland judge ruled this week that Susan Devereaux, who bought the winning ticket when she was engaged to James Everard in 1999, owes him half the remaining money.

"There was clear evidence of a common intention to share the funds," Justice Alphonsus Faour said in his ruling.

Lawyer Owen Myers, who represented Everard, said Faour's ruling is what they had hoped for.

"He's very happy it's turned out this way. He's been through 2 1/2 years of this kind of torture," Myers said.

In his decision, the judge noted the couple's relationship continued to grow, and the following year they moved in together. But the good fortune didn't last. Within two years, the relationship ended and they had spent a significant portion of the money.

The amount left from the $700,000 prize wasn't revealed.

Lottery Post Staff

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

2 comments. Last comment 5 years ago by Michael E. Port.
Page 1 of 1
Benjamin'04's avatar - dude
Standard Member
Regular
Michigan
United States
Member #6016
July 27, 2004
266 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 20, 2004, 9:40 am - IP Logged

lol

Michael E. Port's avatar - walt
Standard Member
Rookie
Dallas, Texas
United States
Member #3335
January 7, 2004
25 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 20, 2004, 9:53 pm - IP Logged

"There was clear evidence of a common intention to share the funds," Justice Alphonsus Faour said in his ruling.

I would like to know what evidence was.  They were NOT even married and now she has to share her winnings?