Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )

Quick Links

USA Mega

NetConnect

Internet Domains, simple and cheap

Find a domain name:

Home

Lottery Results GadgetPetition for True Lottery Drawings
The time is now 6:05 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Man wins share of ex's lotto prize

Aug 20, 2004, 7:00 am

Insider BuzzInsider Buzz: Man wins share of ex's lotto prize

A Newfoundland man has won a legal battle with his former live-in lover for half of what's left of a $700,000 lottery prize.

A Newfoundland judge ruled this week that Susan Devereaux, who bought the winning ticket when she was engaged to James Everard in 1999, owes him half the remaining money.

"There was clear evidence of a common intention to share the funds," Justice Alphonsus Faour said in his ruling.

Lawyer Owen Myers, who represented Everard, said Faour's ruling is what they had hoped for.

"He's very happy it's turned out this way. He's been through 2 1/2 years of this kind of torture," Myers said.

In his decision, the judge noted the couple's relationship continued to grow, and the following year they moved in together. But the good fortune didn't last. Within two years, the relationship ended and they had spent a significant portion of the money.

The amount left from the $700,000 prize wasn't revealed.

Lottery Post Staff

We'd love to see your comments here!  Register for a FREE membership — it takes just a few moments — and you'll be able to post comments here and on any of our forums. If you're already a member, you can Log In to post a comment.

2 comments. Last comment 7 years ago by Michael E. Port.
Page 1 of 1
Benjamin'04's avatar - dude
Michigan
United States
Member #6016
July 27, 2004
266 Posts
Offline
Posted: August 20, 2004, 9:40 am - IP Logged

lol

    Michael E. Port's avatar - walt
    Dallas, Texas
    United States
    Member #3335
    January 7, 2004
    25 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: August 20, 2004, 9:53 pm - IP Logged

    "There was clear evidence of a common intention to share the funds," Justice Alphonsus Faour said in his ruling.

    I would like to know what evidence was.  They were NOT even married and now she has to share her winnings?