Search

Computerized drawings are nice ...Reply
I think one of the main problems here is that you are all over the place. Try sticking to one topic, and then if you have some other different thoughts, start a different topic. You started this topic by saying computerized drawings are easier to win , and that you like computerized drawings. Check your own subject title -- Computerized drawings are nice... So when I replied to you, I was replying to your topic of computerized drawings being easier to win . If you want to talk abo
Oct 27, 2007, 3:21 pm - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Info On RNG'SReply
Mike, That's a harsh way of putting it, but essentially that's the reason. You don't go to computerized drawings because it's more random or any nonsense like that. The randomness of the drawings has nothing to do with any of these decisions. Frankly, the random arguments are the smokescreen for computerized drawings. Manufacturers of the devices try to bring the discussion into a debate over randomness. That's not the most important issue. They bring the discussion there beca
Sep 15, 2007, 8:22 am - Todd - Lottery Discussion Forum

Getting new ballsReply
Ballset switching is most common in Pick3 or Pick4 games but virtually every Lottery does this (what's worse, computerized drawings?) In PA I read they have a senior citizen randomly pick a ballset for the Evening drawing (Midday is computerized) and on games like Powerball or Mega they not only switch entire ballsets every few months but each drawing one of the current sets is picked using some kind of <cringe> RNG or secret drawing. Not only balls get switched but machines also! I still
Dec 28, 2007, 10:36 pm - LckyLary - Lottery Discussion Forum

TENN Lottery Drawings Read this:
Why CAN'T Tennessee get with the program? There is no reason why we can't have computerized drawings like EVERYONE ELSE does. If they had LISTENED to their engineers when told there are problems to begin BEFORE THEY WENT LIVE WITH THE FIRST COMPUTER DRAWING&MISTAKES WOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED!& PLEASE JUST WORK OUT THE BUGS DON'T GIVE UP AND KEEP IT COMPUTERIZED.& IF THE TENNESSEE GOV'T WOULD TRY HALF AS HARD AT A LOT OF THINGS AS THEY DO IN TENNESSEE FOOTBALL WE'D HAVE A GREAT STATE TO LIVE IN!!
Oct 10, 2007, 6:48 am - truthjustice - Lottery Discussion Forum

TENNESSEE LOTTERY-e mail response to computerized drawingsReply
Computerized drawings are what they are going after. The diehards quite frankly really don't care. They'll play whatever they can. Try going to a computerized state and telling the people that are buying a dozen numbers at once about the computerized drawings and they'll tell you, well, usually something not so nice. Unfortunately, the only way to actually get them to stop it is to get all the diehard players to stop buying tickets, which will impact their sales significantly. Unfortuately, I
Jul 26, 2007, 10:58 am - rdc137 - Lottery Discussion Forum

will you play a lottery with computerized drawings?Reply
I've never played a lottery game with computerized drawings because Ohio has never had one and I've only played BigGame and PowerBall out of state. Ohio will have a computerized drawing for Ten-OH a Keno style game starting next month and I probably won't play it because I'm not a fan of Keno style games, I didn't like Lot'O Play either. I prefer live drawings with balls but I'm sure most players don't care either way because scratch-offs are even worse than computerized drawings and mos
Jul 19, 2007, 8:26 pm - RJOh - Lottery Discussion Forum

States with computerized drawings
Does anybody knows the states that are using computerized drawings? could you tell me which ones? I do not trust in artificial randomness . Thanks
Jan 6, 2007, 6:10 pm - LEON - Lottery Discussion Forum

My Lastest reply from the Hoosier lottery
Subj: Re: Prize PayoutsDate: 3/21/05 4:53:56 PM Central Standard TimeFrom: PlayerSupport@HoosierLottery.com I am in receipt of your recent e-mail to the Hoosier Lottery. The Lottery made the important decision to use computerized draws forseveral reasons. As you know, the odds of 4 distinct numbers beingdrawn in any order are approximately 1:416.67. Depending on the year(leap year, etc.), there are approximately 679 drawings for Daily 4throughout the year. Therefore, one could argue that the
Mar 22, 2005, 10:14 am - mark - Lottery Discussion Forum

Are Lotteries RiggedReply
Jim695 I'm no genius, but I know that if something is computerized, it uses a PROM chip or an EPROM chip, which means that it can be programmed. Consider this: If the Hoosier Lottery has their little computerized electronic random number generator tied into their central computer, which tracks players' selections and wager amounts, they can easily minimize payouts on their daily games and, at the same time, build their Lotto jackpot at will (bigger jackpots = more ticket sales), and who w
Dec 28, 2003, 9:54 pm - konane - Lottery Discussion Forum

POLL 1 of 3: Computerized drawings vs. ball drawingsReply
sfillippo wrote: Okay, don't flog me here, but I chose Computerized drawings because that would open up possibilities that maybe it would be possible to create a system that could get hits more often than trying to guess the machine ball outcome. I often thought about this for keno the 3 minute games some states have, if you could record every game say via a camera hookup and some computer software you could figure out how their RNG chip processed the numbers and write a program to make mo
Aug 29, 2007, 10:57 am - four4me - Lottery Discussion Forum