Search

Lawsuit over $315 million lottery jackpot goes to trialReply
The meaning of such an agreement seems crystal clear. If the group had an agreement that everyone would be included whenever they (which means the whole group, and not just the part of the group that is present at any given time) bought tickets then everyone who was part of the group is included. Collecting the ticket money from somebody who isn't there when the rest of the group chips in for the tickets is just one of many details that don't invalidate the rest of the agreement. Whether or
Jun 7, 2006, 4:49 pm - KY Floyd - Lottery News

B.C. Lottery faces lawsuit from second problem gamblerReply
It sounds like you have no idea what the agreement was. They'll throw you out if they know you're there, but they have no obligation to waste their time looking for the people who voluntarily promise not to show up, so they held up their end of it. The only one who broke the agreement is the guy who thinks other people are responsible for his personal shortcomings. He agreed not to show up and gamble, and he agreed that if he did show up he couldn't win anything. That's two ways that he broke th
Jul 26, 2010, 1:15 pm - KY Floyd - Lottery News

Lawsuit over $315 million lottery jackpot goes to trialReply
Quote: Originally posted by KY Floyd on June 7, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by win_nie on June 6, 2006 the group had an oral agreement that everyone would be included whenever they pooled money to buy tickets. so he was not there to pooled his money so therefore I don't see why there is a court case, The meaning of such an agreement seems crystal clear. If the group had an agreement that everyone would be included whenever they (which means the whole group, and not just the part of
Jun 7, 2006, 7:57 pm - konane - Lottery News

Wisconsin man, 24, claims $768.4M Powerball lottery jackpotReply
He better remember to create a Prenuptual agreement with her or anyone else.
Apr 23, 2019, 11:16 pm - music* - Lottery News

N.C. Powerball winner target of $10M lawsuit by local pastorReply
What a leech, going after 10M now after the supposed agreement was for 1.5M.
Feb 15, 2016, 7:49 pm - ArizonaDream - Lottery News

Jury: Lottery winner must pay ex-boyfriend part of winningsReply
So...they had a verbal agreement to split any proceeds from a lottery win. Probably they did, when the romance was young. But, now that they split up, do they have to have an end of verbal agreement? You know like....Remember we had that agreement to split any lottery or other wins....well now that we're splitting up, that agreement is over too!
Feb 5, 2016, 3:40 pm - TheMeatman2005 - Lottery News

$75,000 California Lottery winner leaves with only $75Reply
Yep, I'm in agreement.
May 6, 2015, 5:07 pm - Suzy-Dittlenose - Lottery News

Florida couple, nearly penniless, claim half of $414M lottery jackpotReply
..arbitration agreement...
May 3, 2014, 8:22 am - Artist77 - Lottery News

Lottery winner sues advisors for poor policiesReply
What I read Ogawa did not buy the ticket one of the friends did he bought 3 tickets and distributed one to each member. Also after he won he had the friends sign a purported release agreement. The agreement states there was an agreement to share the Lottery jackpot, but only provides that the friends will receive $1 million(which one of the friends claims he has not received).
Sep 27, 2013, 3:44 pm - dallascowboyfan - Lottery News

Lottery winner stays grounded after $220 million jackpotReply
I agree to your agreement.
Aug 13, 2013, 10:58 am - noise-gate - Lottery News