- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 10:52 am
You last visited
June 1, 2024, 10:52 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Search
Search the Lottery Post forums for the keyword(s) you specify
Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems
Thanks for your thoughtful post bobby623.
Don't you guys think it's time for you to put aside your personal animosities
and get back to the question at hand? Personally, I'd appreciate some constructive comments regarding the role of 'substitution' as it applies to lottery strategies.
If you start at the top of this thread that I initiated in an effort to conduct a discussion of backtesting and simulations, I think you will see that the problems are the result of interference from those
Apr 11, 2011, 8:12 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum
Artificial Intelligence
jimmy
What I don't understand is how you can invest $6.00 for your entertainment and then turn around
and and accuse me of propagating ignorance . Did you never consider that I do this because I love
the chase. The quick picks that you buy come from a system. This system has been designed to pick
a random set of numbers. Consider this, How much bias is used to make your QP's random. You
cannot have any bias and not call it a system. What If I wrote a program that picked random set
Jul 21, 2010, 7:11 pm - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum
Backtesting and Simulating Lottery Systems
(All those reading here for entertainment, with no interest or backbone to post your opinions, take note: I'm about done writing to entertain you with no recompense. Some of those posting, shills, clowns, and their hairdressers, may be rewarded in some way, but unless some of the silent readers give me a reason to continue, these Mathematics and System Threads will soon be left to those with a vested interest in your continuing ignorance!)
-----------------garyo1954--says--------------------
Apr 9, 2011, 6:07 pm - jimmy4164 - Mathematics Forum
Does Mathematical Innumeracy foster superstitions and support the belief in them?
Jimmy
Many of my post take me an hour or more to write. I have with instruction learned to conceal what I consider
my biggest weakness which in my eyes places me just above illiteracy. I was found to be dyslexic upon entry
into the airforce where I received help. I went from c's and d's in HS math and english to making the Deans List
my first semester in college. Most of the writting skills found here will fall around the 8th to 9th grade level.
Some may just be being lazy and not
May 25, 2011, 5:15 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum
Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbers
Jimmy
I stand behind what I wrote, Now and In my post. I Still think that the Digit system will win more then
any other system of play. What you want is for me to spill my best stuff because you don't seem to
be able to get past the stats. I win more then anyone I know who plays the lottery and on a regular
basis. You are the one that does not want to admit that you could be wrong. You don't see the error
of your own ways. I am beginning to think your broken record like repetition
Jan 26, 2011, 4:50 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum
Pick-3 Box or Straight ??
If I may offer an opinion, I think placing too much emphasis on ROI can take the fun out playing the lottery.
In my way of thinking, the only people who will win more than they lose are folks who win a couple of thousand playing a game like Texas Two-Step where the jackpot begins at $200,000 and rolls until won.
I've been trying to win that jackpot for a long time, with less than spectacular results. I will, of course, keep trying.
Some would say I should give it up because of the poor
Apr 10, 2017, 1:30 pm - bobby623 - Mathematics Forum
Statistics around the balance of even/odd and small/big numbers
Jimmy
I just seen the light, you seem to think I have some sort of following here at LP and have
become a guru of sorts. I would say that 99% of people that read these threads are just
looking for some entertainment. I don't have a following and I have to shake my head.
Your thought process is not to add but to tear down. You have never added anything to what
I have posted except to keep repeating what I have known since Jr high.
It looks to me like you are comparing pat
Jan 21, 2011, 8:19 am - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Mathematics Forum