Search

Maybells wheelReply
I thought the Program was distributed as Freeware:Usually Freeware Programs can be distributed to others unless the License Agreement states otherwise.
Nov 23, 2005, 9:11 am - Raven62 - Mathematics Forum

Ideas for Bayesian Networks & predictionReply
system shop with its skilled programmers to develop his ideas into a working program : i have access to analyst, programmer, modeler, etc. Do not hesitate to privately contact me and we can workout something if you have a new/great model that can be validated on historical drawing data. Signed confidentiality agreement, shared percentage profit, fixed cost, and many options available.
Apr 25, 2010, 9:03 pm - mikemerkury - Mathematics Forum

Consecutive numbers in the Pick 6 lottery have surprisingly high probability but still < 50%Reply
My numbers are in exact agreement with johnph77's total. He gave the total number of combinations that had at least one consecutive number, I broke them down into 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, and 5s. Can't say the info will provide everyone with a winning strategy, because not everyone will make the same choices.
Apr 14, 2009, 10:24 pm - time*treat - Mathematics Forum

Determining a Coincidence or Possible TrendReply
guesser, We are in agreement that tracking every number will not let you predict with 100% accuracy. We are also talking about two entirely different things. Since I am not focusing on a specific number or machine (especially since some states don't use machines to pick their numbers) this set number machine number business does not apply to what I have said.
Sep 17, 2006, 3:07 pm - time*treat - Mathematics Forum

you will never win the jackpot with mathematical equationsReply
It must be the Latter. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX5eqs7nu1A The Lyrics of this song are spot on. I am still very interested in the Topic I hope your agreement is with the Topic and not my response.
Jul 12, 2022, 5:46 pm - AllenB - Mathematics Forum

What Does It Take To Win (Mathematically Speaking?)Reply
Jimmie: No, I'm not pointing to anything to demonstrate the efficacy of systems, no matter what color swans they might be. I'm pointing out that the two members on the top predictors list whom I've mentioned in my recent posts represent a body of evidence arguing there is a fly in the ointment worth unbiased examination as to what it implies. My readings of your posts here gave me the impression your feet are set in the concrete of what you already believe you know and that your entire appro
Mar 22, 2011, 9:46 am - JosephusMinimus - Mathematics Forum

Consecutive numbers in the Pick 6 lottery have surprisingly high probability but still < 50%Reply
Speaking of consecutives:) New Jersey Cash 5 winning numbers Today (Friday , April 03, 2009 ) were: 09-19-31-37-38 jackpot rolled to $290,000. so... we have almost perfect agreement between theoretical paper and practice (every second draw) (almost perfect as of 4/1 draw had 2 pairs of consecutives not 1) 04/03/2009 09 19 31 37 38 04/01/2009 11 12 13 25 33
Apr 3, 2009, 8:45 pm - edge - Mathematics Forum

Back to Basics (Dice)Reply
First of all, I never claimed to be able to predict numbers, let alone the exact outcome of the next roll of your die. The mathematics of combinatorics does play a huge role in lotteries as well as dice throwing. While it is impossible to consistently predict the next number to be drawn, their are many things that probabilty will tell you besides the odds . Even in I wanted to try to predict dice rolls, I would still want a much larger history than your 12 throws. If I was forced to choo
Mar 16, 2006, 8:16 pm - Thoth - Mathematics Forum

chaosReply
Pacattack05, though I am having a little bit of a difficult time understanding your posts, once I get the meaning I have to say that I am mostly in agreement. Or at least what I understand. My husband has a theory about my number picking. I have been searching for the perfect system for the pick 3 for a while now. I have found some work better than others but they all fall short in the fact (at least in my experience) that I end up with more combinations than would be fiscally possible to actu
Jun 27, 2005, 11:40 pm - atlasshrugged - Mathematics Forum

Still interested in the Digit System?Reply
Jim, Although I agree you have a valid question, I suppose the ultimate answer lies with the individual. From my perspective I've tried to relate the idea of digital systems from a basic statistical approach. I don't agree that the first and last digits are the hardest to predict. In theory, the first, second, fourth, and fifth back digits are MORE predictable than the third. After charting the first and second, first and fifth and last two back digits in 11(?) games, there is no surprise
May 7, 2011, 7:56 pm - garyo1954 - Mathematics Forum