Search

compressed string $028137465$ for digit games(P3,P4 ,P5)
I have noticed that, if you're too much into systems, you loose your betting strategy ( I prefer a hit ratio of 0.20 with higher prize ratio of 0.80 !). The above string is a deduction of my previous system and is very simple to use if you are in to win, it takes diligence and focus. Take any draw and reduce the string to miimum digits ( 3 for P3, 5 for P4). Let's use florida data for illustration: Data Florida Sun, Dec 23, 2012 946 506 3723 8890 Sat, Dec 22, 2012 718 995 7980 179
Dec 23, 2012, 11:35 pm - adobea78 - Lottery Systems Forum

Gail Howard Lottery Knowledge.Reply
I voted NO. After logging hundreds of lottery combinations for 5 games, and observing hundreds of actual drawings (Texas) I'm convinced that trying to accurately predict the next winning combination is a waste of time, and money. GH and others peddling prediction systems are making tons of money by convincing gullible players that their so-called systems are capable of knowing in advance what the winning numbers will be - Bullshi.... A lot of 'Brooklyn bridges' are being sold ever
Oct 22, 2012, 12:29 pm - bobby623 - Lottery Discussion Forum

Fla. man wins $35M lottery jackpot with computer softwareReply
Big ego?!!! Haw-haw! You cannot measure the performance of luck, unless you consider how much bad luck performs. He took action and did what he knew best. There is no problem of him getting the jackpot numbers in his selection before and this documents that systematic play does work. Notice he is not buying reams of Quick-picks and he self picked for $2. There is no system to follow for luck, unless you want to go down some goat trail of superstition and even then the perfor
Jul 21, 2011, 6:09 pm - Delta Draw - Lottery News

What is a lottery system? What distinguishes a lottery system from guesses, dreams and quick picks?Reply
jimmy Care to explain your smug remark below. However, when someone claims that the reason the percentage of self pick (SP) winners is 30% is because the percentage of SP ticket purchases is 30%, you have a problem. I don't remember saying that it is because they are SP just that 30% are won with SP'S Can you tell me how many of the SP are developed system plays and how many are not. Show me the proof that says all lower prizes are evenly spread accross the board. Your
Apr 5, 2011, 5:11 pm - RL-RANDOMLOGIC - Lottery Discussion Forum

New York: 3/1 - 3/31/2011Reply
No disrepect to ANYONE in this room, but I need to address some things that have/are going on behind the scenes. I've always said, the System I use is NOT MY OWN!!!! I've been on Lottery Post Under Another Moniker since 2005 sometimes being a platinum user and most times being a standard member. As long as I've been coming on LP, It's always been a lot of NICE folks in the Forums that have helped and then there have always been a handful that were being a hinderance, which I learned to ignore. L
Mar 14, 2011, 9:35 pm - newgranny718 - Pick 3 Forum

MATH 5/39: Stack47, Garyo1954, RL-RANDOMLOGIC VS Jimmy4164Reply
It's amazing how you concluded my calculations were based on a one time bet of $360. You missed where I said Don't bother telling us your imaginary 360 QPs would get the same results if you played them when RL made his bets because we already knew that . And I could have added 360 $1 bets or any possible combination of bets equaling $360 and the results would be exactly the same. Apparently I was wrong when I thought you knew 72% of 360 always equals 259.2 no matter how you divide the 360 b
Mar 2, 2011, 10:07 pm - Stack47 - Mathematics Forum

The best software for predicting Lotto #s in the current marketReply
I've been playing lotteries for a long time. I have bought several commercial lottery systems, but, none have produced winning combinations on a regular basis. Fact is, several of the systems have NEVER given me a winning combination. I've even bought a couple of Steve Players expensive workouts. Shame on me! So, after years of frustration, I decided to develope my own system I call it 'Gap Strategy.' Assuming there were/are many regular lottery players dealing with the same
Jan 3, 2011, 5:44 pm - bobby623 - Lottery Systems Forum

Maryland Pick 4 for December!Reply
Evening number was 4051 closer than i thought I'd get .... I can't rap my head around these purple balls in the mix with the regular balls they screw with the way i use power trails. Frankly there isn't much i can do about it by the time ten draws are on the books the purple balls have migrated throughout the disbursement of history that there's no way to separate them completely. What i am saying is power trails are done on here without the use of the purple ball drawings but you need t
Dec 8, 2010, 10:11 pm - four4me - Pick 4 Forum

Fooled by RandomnessReply
Hello Jimmy4164, Great thread. I enjoy and agree with many of Mr. Taleb ideas. But nowhere does he give an example of random occurrences The examples he gives just prove that oftentimes the herd may get it wrong, but there is always a handful that see perturbations, or patterns no one else sees or sees as well. Mr. Taleb was able to see it, and so were a few others. There are always patterns Jimmy. When you look at the natural universe, Nature - the Patternmaster(term borrowe
Sep 30, 2010, 11:29 am - Kola - Lottery Systems Forum

If All 80,000 Members of LP Dedicated to Systems for PB and Pick6 We will Win it EverydayReply
IF you 2 are done, How do we win this and is it even possible to put egos on hold long enough to get some work done? Step 1, best way to organize a co-opreative venture. This is the groundwork to ensure smooth operations and has NOTHING to do with systems, number selection or therories. Identify possible points of contention and neutralize with creative/common sense solutions. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. This is a basic outline I came up with for a wor
Aug 21, 2010, 12:20 pm - wheeltowin - Lottery Discussion Forum