Search

Straight in WC 2Reply
Getting real workable for progressive betting I will give list another 10 days 27 combos left 127, 235, 489, 237, 067, 157, 247, 256, 346, 059, 356, 789, 023, 159, 249, 258, 348, 123, 169, 367, 025, 034, 359, 368, 017, 035, 189,468,018, 027,126, 379, 568
May 9, 2013, 8:07 am - Amazing Grace - Pick 3 Forum

Tennessee: 2/1 - 2/28/2013Reply
Hate to be bearer off bad news. But there is no1 who can tell you what number will come tomorrow the next day or the next day..... If they can make sure they msg me with that info.......picking 1 exact number out of 1000, for pick 3 or 10000 out of pick is extremely challenging. It's tons of folks who can look at results and say well if u add 123 to a number from 18 weeks ago you will get the winning number. Some folks even buy books from gas station with hundreds of numbers in them. You bound
Feb 6, 2013, 8:58 pm - Pick4ologist - Pick 4 Forum

Reduce your odds 72% and double your payouts System.Reply
Exactly! This is why I do not like playing small sets of numbers. Broad strokes are much better than fine lines in the lottery. When you play these small sets you set yourself up for getting burnt by an anomaly. This is why I like playing several hundred combinations at a time. I don't think there is a viable way to consistently narrow the field more than that. This is why its better to play all the straight numbers in a progressive betting strategy after seeing 4 doubles in a row. This would
Oct 8, 2011, 11:46 pm - mayhem - Lottery Systems Forum

Heads or TailsReply
Would you be wrong to not have a cut off point? If you are progressive betting than increasing 1 unit after every lost would give you a profit as soon as tails shows up....Atleast that's the way i'm seeing it. Can we have some more opinions please? Anybody else..........
Jan 19, 2011, 10:24 am - Teamprofit - Mathematics Forum

Line ReductionReply
time*treat........at the moment the reduction method seems to be taking care of pairs and triplets depending on the setting, but I will have to do some more work to see how accurate it is. RJOH......with the strategy I am using at the moment I use two sets of 36 numbers that cover all 49, and am hoping to see how well progressive betting will work up to a maximum of 100 lines. The first draw I played 34 lines and got 2x3 in the lotto and 1x3 in the lottoplus, the second draw I played 74 li
Dec 3, 2010, 4:10 am - Ramijami - Lottery Systems Forum

Nov. 30: NJ's Missing DigitReply
After a week of not appearing, it is Progressive Betting Time (PBT). Pull out your bankroll, spare change, put the piggy bank on alert, etc. Play the singles or the doubles. Put something progressively on each. Each draw that does not produce the digit 1..., BOOM !put more money on it for the next draw. Look at the history look for the time of longest out to get a gage. Yes it can be scary...but when you emerge victoriously... OH WHAT A FEELING!
Dec 2, 2010, 4:38 pm - LAVERNE MALONEY - Pick 3 Forum

Nov. 30: FL's Missing DigitReply
After a week of not appearing, it is Progressive Betting Time (PBT). Pull out your bankroll, spare change, put the piggy bank on alert, etc. Play the singles or the doubles. Put something progressively on each. Each draw that does not produce the digit 1..., BOOM !put more money on it for the next draw. Look at the history look for the time of longest out to get a gage. Yes it can be scary...but when you emerge victoriously... OH WHAT A FEELING!
Dec 1, 2010, 3:08 pm - LAVERNE MALONEY - Pick 3 Forum

The numbers. You have learned them, you playe them, Love them. But will you ever?Reply
I think this applies if a person was say winning Pick3 consistently with only around $50 on a straight or $20 boxed. This would produce lots of profit and then be multiplied by how many players this method would then be available to along with progressive betting ($1, $2, and so on per number). The state would lose because it would most definitely spread...and fast!!! They'd have to adjust the game then. However, with the current number of straight and boxed hits recorded in comparison to the
Apr 30, 2010, 10:28 am - Lucky Loser - Lottery Discussion Forum

Would you play 90 to winReply
By the way, I'd highly recommend progressive betting in this case and simply start with .50/number str8. This would only cost $125 since the payout is $250. This hit would allow you to immediately recover your $125, with the $125 in profit and, go for the $500 on the next play. Why? It costs $250 to play for the $1 str8, which you have now,and will produce double the profit with the same system being implemented properly. It's all about managing your money in the most efficient way possible w
Apr 8, 2010, 1:11 pm - Lucky Loser - Lottery Discussion Forum

New York: 7/1 - 7/31/2009Reply
Wow, this is the 7th hit from the list. I thought a repeat could show. Need to study this outcome and probabilities of these pairs. I really like the 97 pair and previously listed combos. Also need to check out progressive betting. Who knows, I hope I am on to something but we all know this is NY!! Sticking with the 97 pair and combos. Good Luck Everyone, Sunkist
Jul 18, 2009, 7:58 pm - sunkist - Pick 3 Forum