You last visited August 30, 2008, 12:11 am
|
Please rate the site's download speed
How fast are Lottery Post's pages loading to completion in your web browser?
PA United States Member #27243 November 23, 2005 1402 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 12:43 am - IP Logged |
|
Here is how long it took for me:
This page was generated in 0.0739 seconds
I am using Windows Vista Home Premium with IE7
Pages are loading at double speed for me, than before
|
|
|
Miss Kitty georgia United States Member #14 November 9, 2001 18684 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 1:01 am - IP Logged |
|
0.98833 seconds love to nibble those micey feet.
|
|
|
Sunny SW Florida United States Member #25708 November 5, 2005 4068 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 1:34 am - IP Logged |
|
Not really sure. Sorry.
Edit: A little faster using Firefox
|
|
|
Chief Bottle Washer New Jersey United States Member #1 May 31, 2000 14937 Posts Online |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 1:52 am - IP Logged |
|
Just to be clear: please ignore the generated time you see, for the purposes of this topic. (The generated number being something like "0.09725".)
I'm reasonably sure the server is rocking now, and generating pages tremendously quickly.
The main thing that I have implemented enhancements on is the download time, which is completely different than the "generated time" shown on the bottom of the screen.
In other words, how does the page download time FEEL. Does it FEEL like it is coming up quicker, does it FEEL like it is finishing loading quicker.
If you don't know, that's fine. If you get a sense that things are happening quicker, they probably are. Does it feel snappier? Then that would indicate "faster", so check the "faster" box.
I really appreciate everyone's input on this.
|
|
|
MD United States Member #1735 June 18, 2003 5032 Posts Online |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 2:10 am - IP Logged |
|
In other words, how does the page download time FEEL.
Faster
Does it FEEL like it is coming up quicker,
Yes
does it FEEL like it is finishing loading quicker.
Yes
|
|
|
somewhere Canada Member #40343 May 24, 2006 111 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 5:09 am - IP Logged |
|
Hi Todd>>
Using Firefox 3.0.1 with Windows XP PRO SP3-2G's mem and 512 video...very fast, but nothing notable during the past 2 weeks.
Loaded most of the LINKS at left and from the drop-down for a check and honestly saw no change to note. I am fine with the situation as presented. Hope this helps. I will be adding more mem and another tandem SLI videocard in the next few weeks. Now that may cause a surprise!!
yt
dx123
|
|
|
Northeastern, Ohio United States Member #20 December 20, 2000 39737 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 6:38 am - IP Logged |
|
Pages loading, and posting threads much faster - I see a big difference !!
|
|
|
Kunming China Member #58390 January 23, 2008 987 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 6:53 am - IP Logged |
|
Pages loading, and posting threads much faster - I see a big difference !! Todd, it is faster especially when you are "replying". It use to be a lot slower. Good job!!! You are defintely THE MAN!!!! Thanks!
 
"WE WANT NOTHING LESS THAN A JACKPOT"
|
|
|
New Jersey United States Member #27411 November 26, 2005 9598 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 8:12 am - IP Logged |
|
Most definitely faster than 2 weeks ago....! I'm also no longer getting that nasty error message every time I try to reply... :)
Thanks Todd!
|
|
|
south houston, TX United States Member #46810 September 8, 2006 863 Posts Offline |
| Posted: August 6, 2008, 8:35 am - IP Logged |
|
For those of us who know how to turn on the computer and somehow stumble thru ( I know I can't be the only one out here) It seems faster to me. Thanks Todd!
|
|
|
|
