Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
The time is now 1:42 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

How do you combine two unique setsPrevious TopicNext Topic

Topic closed. 8 replies. Last post 3 years ago by Editgap.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
Avatar

United States
Member #24782
October 22, 2005
551 Posts
Offline
Posted: May 22, 2009, 6:59 am - IP Logged

I seem to recall in probabilty class that you can combine 2-uniqe sets -{A, B, C, D, E} with {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j}

to form a pair. It is either a summation or some other function. Anyone know how.

    WIN  D's avatar - e255740
    Stone Mountain*Georgia
    United States
    Member #837
    November 2, 2002
    9089 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: May 22, 2009, 8:58 am - IP Logged

     Hello Editgap.....

    Are you talking about something like a data merge ......weighted by llikelihood of weight....with weight ? 

    .... you might estimate some number of quantiles for each set of replicates ...and then  
    average the quantile points...... then compare the results to a similar set
    of quantiles generated from your simulation data. 

    Fit an a priori distribution to each set of replicates within each distribution parameter...... average across sets, then you could compare
    to the parameters obtained from fitting the simulation data.

    Amazing Photos: The Little Things in Life       "It's just as important to show how you missed the number ......as how you hit it." 

      Avatar

      United States
      Member #24782
      October 22, 2005
      551 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: May 22, 2009, 9:30 pm - IP Logged

      Can you elaborate on what you mean?

      I was thinking to pair two unidentical sets, you find an interger the two sets have in common and pair up the numbers.

      An easy way to find common interger is to multiple the sum of set one with set two. That way you would get an even pair.

      The problem is I don't know if this is the goal or is it effective.

      IE instead of using the multiple of two sets, you can use the smallest digit that results in an even pair.

      Example for 2 unique sets of 5 instead of 5 * 5 or 25, you use 5. IE each number pairs precisely with one other number in the other set.

      Example II for 2 unique sets of 5 and 6 set, you will require 5 * 6 or 30 to get an even pair. Instead of a simple pair as in 5 by 5 in previous example, you get 30 instead of 5.

      Anyone recall this in probaility course.

        sherita's avatar - yesnurse
        Georgia
        United States
        Member #3685
        February 6, 2004
        2487 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: May 22, 2009, 9:41 pm - IP Logged

        I seem to recall in probabilty class that you can combine 2-uniqe sets -{A, B, C, D, E} with {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j}

        to form a pair. It is either a summation or some other function. Anyone know how.

        Simple..on paper that is..

        Aa Ba Ca Da Ea

        Ab Bb Cb Db Eb

        Ac Bc Cc Dc Ec

        Ad Bd Cd Dd Ed

        Ae Be Ce De Ee

        Af Bf Cf Df Ef

        Ag Bg Cg Dg Eg

        Ah Bh Ch Dh Eh

        Ai Bi Ci Di Ei

        Aj Bj Cj Dj Ej

        LurkingWe are all in it to win in GA!!

          sherita's avatar - yesnurse
          Georgia
          United States
          Member #3685
          February 6, 2004
          2487 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: May 22, 2009, 9:43 pm - IP Logged

          I seem to recall in probabilty class that you can combine 2-uniqe sets -{A, B, C, D, E} with {a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j}

          to form a pair. It is either a summation or some other function. Anyone know how.

          But each letter must have an assigned number

          LurkingWe are all in it to win in GA!!

            Avatar

            United States
            Member #24782
            October 22, 2005
            551 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: May 22, 2009, 9:56 pm - IP Logged

            Sherita,

            That seems like a combination of all sets.

            I am thinking of a simple combination that will give you simple pairing.

            I am not sure how to discribe it because I don't know what the purpose is.

            Try to see if anyone remembers.

              sherita's avatar - yesnurse
              Georgia
              United States
              Member #3685
              February 6, 2004
              2487 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: May 22, 2009, 10:02 pm - IP Logged

              Sherita,

              That seems like a combination of all sets.

              I am thinking of a simple combination that will give you simple pairing.

              I am not sure how to discribe it because I don't know what the purpose is.

              Try to see if anyone remembers.

              True it is a combo of all sets. Example, if ABCDE =12345, then abcde =67890, see what I mean ..then all the combos would be different

              LurkingWe are all in it to win in GA!!

                Avatar

                United States
                Member #24782
                October 22, 2005
                551 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: May 24, 2009, 1:33 pm - IP Logged

                Simple..on paper that is..

                Aa Ba Ca Da Ea

                Ab Bb Cb Db Eb

                Ac Bc Cc Dc Ec

                Ad Bd Cd Dd Ed

                Ae Be Ce De Ee

                Af Bf Cf Df Ef

                Ag Bg Cg Dg Eg

                Ah Bh Ch Dh Eh

                Ai Bi Ci Di Ei

                Aj Bj Cj Dj Ej

                Sherita here is a challenge.

                How do you combine those numbers that if I chose a single digit from either set like B, g, j, D. That one of each pair contains the number using a minimum of a possible combinations.

                  Avatar

                  United States
                  Member #24782
                  October 22, 2005
                  551 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: May 24, 2009, 1:46 pm - IP Logged

                  So you can see that any group that cointains all the possible pairs of A ie Aa Ab Ac Ad Ae Af Ag Ah Ai Aj would not be a sufficient answer because of the rule that you are combining one from set one and one from set 2 with B?, C?, D?, E? remaining.

                  In other words, you need a least combination from set 1 to set 2 which in this case is 2:1