Is anyone having any success with lottery number generators?Previous TopicNext Topic

I have tried lottery number generators, including here, but no success so far.. Is anyone having a good time playing their numbers?

regards

I use LP's RNG to play on paper just to see how close it comes to winning. I'll typically run 10-20 lines on MM, Tx Lotto, and Tx 2 Step. No winners yet.

Actually, using the numbers generator has helped me increase my winnings, it takes time.  If you look at the heavy hitters on this site, I believe that they are using the generator too.

I've gotten a couple box wins off LP's RNG on the P3 but I seldom play P3 or P4 anymore so I occasionally use it for jackpot games just to try to shake things up a little in one of my dry spells.

I also like to add a line from there when I get into one of my mini-streaks of luck which usually run for a week, sometimes two.

Good luck to ya!

I use the LP RNG to check my personal RNG which allows me to enter parameters and other data to pick a customized set of combinations to play and it does as well if not better than it but I still use my RNG.

I use it sometimes, when I need a few lines for Powerball. However, I really haven't kept track, of how much I have won or lost with it.

Try JADE's Lottery Selector. It has been good at coming up with small prizes now and then. But don't expect it to perform miracles.

What is the point of using a Random Number Generator in the first place ??? Anyone can choose their own numbers at random.  What advantage does a RNG provide ???

Does the LP RNG have a built in database of past PB or MM numbers such that it is randomly selecting numbers with some methodology that makes some sense, based on previous draws ??? 

Otherwise, it seems like playing these results could be a waste of money, that anyone could figure out themselves, by selecting your own random numbers, or doing a Lottery Terminal Quick Pick. 

So, what is the real advantage of using a RNG ???

The point is that is is no right way or wrong way to pick numbers. I play Maddog's MM and PB challenges every week, and I do better on PB just picking numbers from the top of my head than playing my regular numbers for MM. But I have had some hits playing numbers from the files I keep. An RNG is just another way to pick numbers. To each his own.

The concept of playing lottery and expecting success, or a win, is a bit off.

In the Pick 5, Pick 6, and 5 + 1 games, no matter how you choose your numbers, or let a RNG choose your numbers, you are most often going to hit whatever doesn't pay.

Using Pick 6 as an example, you will hit 0, 1, or 2 numbers, which do not pay a thing.

This is the way the games are designed.

So, what is the real advantage of using a RNG ???

It removes the dreary of thinking from the process of picking lottery numbers to play and gives us the advantage of seeing those randomly picked numbers before we commit to them.   The LP RNG doesn't have a built in database of past drawings but there are RNGs that allow us to load up  databases of any games and pick combinations using parameters we set.

Can this improve our odds of winning?  I don't know, the answer can only be gotten by those who are willing to spent the time to investigate while the rest of have only the randomness of luck to depend on.

Whatever you use, if a game has too many possible combinations, it is hard to win.

People win jackpots by chance more or less, but most who do won't again win, those who win small prizes by a good prediction method, should win more often than those who buy the same amount of quick picks, so in general prediction methods might work best for games that have fewer combinations, if a person gets 40 quick picks for the pick 3 game 2 times a day and another who has a more or less good prediction method comes out with also 40 numbers per draw, there is a higher chance that he or she who uses the prediction method might do better if such prediction method is based on statistics, but many "prediction" methods are no better than quick picks, because they are not based on stuff that works.

And it is always the fact that the lotteries run their own draws and that no matter if they make 1 Billion $ a year they always want more, they never have enough.

I have proven, at least to myself that good prediction methods are much better than quick picks.

If you ask the lotteries they will say that no matter how you get your numbers they are only as good as quick picks, of course they will say that, that does not mean that it is the truth, the truth is that many or most prediction methods used by people might be no better than quick picks, prediction is not an easy thing, not impossible, just not easy.

Many things can only be done witrh the use of software, if there is no such good software, then there might not also be good prediction, but the software has to be based on proven prediction methods as most software might be junk.

If a person does not know how to predict then he or she also can't make a program that will predict winning numbers.

He or she who has a fair understanding of random and of prediction might find a way to win a little more often than he or she would by the use of quick picks, this does not mean that a profit will be made, just that it will be better than if quick picks were bought, but maybe some do make a profit.

LANTERN,

"I have proven, at least to myself that good prediction methods are much better than quick picks."

Using the Illinois Little Loto as an example, since it is drawn everyday, thus far in 2009, this is the jackpot breakdown:

132 Jackpots

111 QP

71 PS

This includes shared jackpots.

Quick Picks won 84.09% of the time.

Player's picks won 53.7% of the time.

So evidently no matter how good "prediction methods" people may think they have they aren't hitting with them or aren't playing them.

I'd like to see anyopne who touts picking numbers over quick picks pick a game and track it day by day for a year and see what they find out.

Thus far, having tracked this game day by day for two years all I know is that a lot of people who don't like quick picks inisist that they don't hit that often. Til they pick a game and track it, all they are doing is displaying opinion over fact.

There sure are a lot of lotto players who went to Maven University, whose motto is

OPINION OVER KNOWLEDGE.

Maybe it would be quite interesting if we could get people here to pick a game and track it and see the actual results.

You didn't understand my post.

Of course, since most people who buy numbers, buy quick picks, most people who win also will win by quick picks, after all, the possible number of combinations on those games is too great for people to win by technique, that is easily understood.

But of those who win small prizes, if there were 2 groups of 1 000 000 each and 1 group buys quick picks and the people on the other group have good statistical knowledge of the game and use it to make up their numbers with and they both buy the same amount of numbers for the same period of time, those who made their own numbers using good  statistical prediction rules will win more money.

I am not talking about those who buy dream numbers and or birthday numbers, Etc, few of those who make their own numbers know anything about the right way to predict.

-------------------

Those who don't understand lottery prediction, of course don't know any better.