Quote: Originally posted by visiondude on Aug 17, 2010
sure humans can influence outcome, by good or "bad" choices based both in knowledge OR even accidental ignorance.
if you read my preambles about what i believe about "systems" - it's that i don't.
i "don't", ONLY because i have never actually seen proof demonstrated, and if lottery manipulation IS possible, it can EASILY be demonstrated - and like i consistently contend, "repeated".
never actually seen it, and this does not fall under the mystical "unseen" definition of something like quantum theory, because quantum theory IS a theory, and is not specifically observable, and therefore the lottery issue falls outside the "interpretative" excuses clause
the excuse that lottery systems are akin to something like 'quantum theory' lends itself to a wide open UNECESSARY "interpretation", instead of what should be an easily observable event.
people in here swear it works, but when asked to show that it actually does, they grow dead silent (or, they call you names...)
you have to ask yourself why that is, in comparison to it "supposedly" being a slam dunk.
if "they" can supposedly do it themselves, they can easily replicate it for proof purposes in here.
especially to silence someone like me. given "me" vs the no physical proof ought to REALLY tell you something
they don't, because it's not true.
i can see someone hiding their "secret" if it really DID work, but measuring the "no proof yet" deal in 8 observable years at LP, vs actual "demonstraters"...........no.
do i believe that outcomes in life are (or "can be") manipulated by man......OF COURSE.
everyday i wake up i have personal responsibility to do whatever i can to make sure (choice wise) that my life matches my known goals, and often times it's up to me to do something, whereas the responsibility is not particularly on God at that moment.
after i do what i am responsible for, including "improvements" or "upgrades" toward a better future, i walk away from that, and the rest of that equation falls upon Gods responsibility.
that's exactly why i buy 1QP and walk away from it after that. i did what i was responsible for (FOR ME), and i walk away and wait to see if i was right about this.
do i believe that the lottery "can be" manipulated by man? no. but ONLY because i have not observed what is "supposedly" an observable event.
i don't believe, not because i don't WANT to believe. i don't believe because it's never been demonstrated AS truth.
that's the difference.
demonstrate that it works, and i will be pro system
for me, the 1QP is what i am supposed to do. it's my "marching orders"
let's say systems worked, i STILL wouldn't employ them, because they are outside the design behind my life (for me).
if they really worked, i would not be opposed if anyone else employed them as their "methodology".
in my life views, there are certain things that ARE black and white and attributable straight across the board to each individual.
but in no way am i to think that someone else "could" be blessed using a "different methodology" than the one behind my design.
i fully recognize the value that someone else could be blessed who chose their numbers.
i just part ways with an individual who pretends to think they "made it happen" per se, because i have yet to see where that is remotely impossible.
that's why i was miffed when the integrity ain'ts in here would PURPOSEFULLY lie about me, that i was "QP only, and anti-system"
reading this last post you would think i have almost "softened" my position, but i haven't. this is my collective reasoning on this issue, and i have held fast to this position for 8 years at LP in unwavering fashion.
did that satisfy your question?