P-3 system formulaPrevious TopicNext Topic

It was worth the try but I see a potential flaw with this system.

Since the algorithm is constant, ex. you -/+ X95, -/+ X48, etc, each combination will yield the same set of numbers.

For example, 3-7-7 will always yield the following numbers indicated below.

362,315,007,547,337,387,227,757,340,394,977,477,373,378,382,339,647,107,317,367,427,997,304,350,777,277,371,and finally... 376.

If I used 3-7-7 as my primary numbers from the 1/1/2011 drawing, it would have given me around 3 consecutive box hits for 1/2/2011,1/3/2011, and 1/4/2011. This is great but it is only coincidence.

So lets say that 3-7-7 turned up again at 1/13/2011 and you decide to use it again as your primary number. By using 3-7-7 again, you are going to be using the same set of numbers that is associated with 3-7-7. If you did use the 3-7-7 from 1/13/2011, then you would have gotten 1 box hit a few days later and no more. There will be numerous occasions where using 3-7-7 (or any given input for that matter) will give you nothing, nada, no wins.

What I'm trying to say is, a system that generates the same set of numbers for a given input, is like saying that the pick 3 lottery (or any lottery) has some sort of uniformity or consistency, which it does not. A good system is a system that doesn't generate consistent (same) sets but instead is adaptive to the situation.

A win is a win if it hits.  That is the name of the game.  I value any download and it hit in NM already. Now, what system do you have that is better???

So you're saying that you don't care about the logic of it all as long as you win eh? As to your question, I'm still testing my own system but the question is, why am I on here? To find some ideas and to give some critiques (which you don't seem to like).

It was worth the try but I see a potential flaw with this system.

Since the algorithm is constant, ex. you -/+ X95, -/+ X48, etc, each combination will yield the same set of numbers.

For example, 3-7-7 will always yield the following numbers indicated below.

362,315,007,547,337,387,227,757,340,394,977,477,373,378,382,339,647,107,317,367,427,997,304,350,777,277,371,and finally... 376.

If I used 3-7-7 as my primary numbers from the 1/1/2011 drawing, it would have given me around 3 consecutive box hits for 1/2/2011,1/3/2011, and 1/4/2011. This is great but it is only coincidence.

So lets say that 3-7-7 turned up again at 1/13/2011 and you decide to use it again as your primary number. By using 3-7-7 again, you are going to be using the same set of numbers that is associated with 3-7-7. If you did use the 3-7-7 from 1/13/2011, then you would have gotten 1 box hit a few days later and no more. There will be numerous occasions where using 3-7-7 (or any given input for that matter) will give you nothing, nada, no wins.

What I'm trying to say is, a system that generates the same set of numbers for a given input, is like saying that the pick 3 lottery (or any lottery) has some sort of uniformity or consistency, which it does not. A good system is a system that doesn't generate consistent (same) sets but instead is adaptive to the situation.

every system has one flaw or another. there will NEVER ever be a system that works all the time. Even if you change the numbers after every draw, number chaos, pretests, ball set rotations, and machine rotations will corrupt the data used to predict successfully.

The interesting thing about any system is not HOW does it work, but DOES it work?

If I were looking at this early today, I would have asked myself: does 0 bring doubles, or does doubles bring 0?

It appears, more often than not at this time in the Texas midday game, doubles and zeros are hitting withing TWO draws of each other.

Good rules of thumb.

So you're saying that you don't care about the logic of it all as long as you win eh? As to your question, I'm still testing my own system but the question is, why am I on here? To find some ideas and to give some critiques (which you don't seem to like).