Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
The time is now 6:52 am
You last visited August 27, 2014, 6:50 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

Do some number combinations have better odds?

Topic closed. 5280 replies. Last post 1 year ago by rdgrnr.

Page 162 of 353
4.820
PrintE-mailLink
Boney526's avatar - NjlpLogo
New Jersey
United States
Member #99034
October 18, 2010
1439 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 30, 2012, 1:03 pm - IP Logged

Your the one who said humans have "selective memory" .......... 

All I'm saying is chosen numbers have BETTER ODDS over RNG and you already helped prove that. I'm sorry that you cant run that through you logic machine and get a logical reason........ 

Some things are learned through practical application and ultimately CHANGE what is taught in the sacred  class room where your reality comes from.

What proof?

 

One RNG didn't hold up?

 

Well lemme tell you.  If you selected 1000 RNGed sets you'd probably find that on average, they performed just as well as you'd expect them to.  On average.

 

It's your SELECTIVE MEMORY which is causing you to think you gained an advantage.  I am 100% certain that if you repreated the experiment thousands of times, your self picked numbers would perform exactly the same as RNG numbers.

 

Good luck, again changing the basis of probability theory.  Which you won't.  Some things change.  But 1+1 will always be 2, no matter how hard you try to make it 3 or more.

    Avatar
    Kentucky
    United States
    Member #32652
    February 14, 2006
    5399 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 30, 2012, 2:45 pm - IP Logged

    I think for some people the only reality they need is what they learn in a class room.....

    Probability is just the probable outcome based on whatever we know of what we're choosing from, but over time random outcomes create other probabilities. The probability here is any group of 28 numbers should have a five number match every 39 drawings. We found one group of 28 numbers that didn't match probability, but we can say if it has 2 five number matches in the next 39 drawings it will still average once in every 39 or the expected probability. But by adding more time or more drawings, we now must expect that group to exceed the one in 39 probability in the next 39 drawings.

    I found a group of 28 numbers that had a five number match in 8 consecutive drawings and for that group to match probability, it can't have another five number match in the next 273 drawings. But that doesn't change the probability it should get a five number match in the next 39 drawings and six more in the 234 drawings after that. 

    The last 28 numbers drawn should almost always have 6 five numbers matches in the last six drawings because of repeats so that should prove there are groups of numbers with better odds of beating probability.

    There is reality with math; we must learn to use it correctly.

      helpmewin's avatar - dandy
      u$a
      United States
      Member #106669
      February 22, 2011
      16991 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 30, 2012, 3:59 pm - IP Logged

      hey ronnie, look@ this

       

      indiana Hoosier lottery numbers i put in Oct 31st (1-8-11-36-37-38)

       

      Cold/Hot (20 Numbers) 15-39-32-37-42-35-50-51-01-38-03-36-06-14-13-53-52-40-16-34

       

      the next draw Nov 3rd was (32-35-38-39-40-44)

      now how would one know what to playWhat?

                       


        United States
        Member #116272
        September 7, 2011
        20244 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 30, 2012, 8:44 pm - IP Logged

        What proof?

         

        One RNG didn't hold up?

         

        Well lemme tell you.  If you selected 1000 RNGed sets you'd probably find that on average, they performed just as well as you'd expect them to.  On average.

         

        It's your SELECTIVE MEMORY which is causing you to think you gained an advantage.  I am 100% certain that if you repreated the experiment thousands of times, your self picked numbers would perform exactly the same as RNG numbers.

         

        Good luck, again changing the basis of probability theory.  Which you won't.  Some things change.  But 1+1 will always be 2, no matter how hard you try to make it 3 or more.

        Ok B, your not the first naysayer to show up with heaps of negativity and Im sure you wont be the last.


          United States
          Member #116272
          September 7, 2011
          20244 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: November 30, 2012, 8:47 pm - IP Logged

          I wonder how quick you would have said "its just a quirk" when the Wright brothers got a plane off the ground the very first time for 18 seconds?????????


            United States
            Member #116272
            September 7, 2011
            20244 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: November 30, 2012, 8:51 pm - IP Logged

            What proof?

             

            One RNG didn't hold up?

             

            Well lemme tell you.  If you selected 1000 RNGed sets you'd probably find that on average, they performed just as well as you'd expect them to.  On average.

             

            It's your SELECTIVE MEMORY which is causing you to think you gained an advantage.  I am 100% certain that if you repreated the experiment thousands of times, your self picked numbers would perform exactly the same as RNG numbers.

             

            Good luck, again changing the basis of probability theory.  Which you won't.  Some things change.  But 1+1 will always be 2, no matter how hard you try to make it 3 or more.

            Another thing B, you keep speaking for me and saying that Im "gaining an advantage" or "getting an edge over the lottery" and I have never said those things........ 

            The thread is about getting BETTER ODDS, no matter how slight.............


              United States
              Member #116272
              September 7, 2011
              20244 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: November 30, 2012, 8:52 pm - IP Logged

              hey ronnie, look@ this

               

              indiana Hoosier lottery numbers i put in Oct 31st (1-8-11-36-37-38)

               

              Cold/Hot (20 Numbers) 15-39-32-37-42-35-50-51-01-38-03-36-06-14-13-53-52-40-16-34

               

              the next draw Nov 3rd was (32-35-38-39-40-44)

              now how would one know what to playWhat?

              Nice call   helpmewin ............... Im sure it was just aquirk......


                United States
                Member #116272
                September 7, 2011
                20244 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: November 30, 2012, 8:57 pm - IP Logged

                What proof?

                 

                One RNG didn't hold up?

                 

                Well lemme tell you.  If you selected 1000 RNGed sets you'd probably find that on average, they performed just as well as you'd expect them to.  On average.

                 

                It's your SELECTIVE MEMORY which is causing you to think you gained an advantage.  I am 100% certain that if you repreated the experiment thousands of times, your self picked numbers would perform exactly the same as RNG numbers.

                 

                Good luck, again changing the basis of probability theory.  Which you won't.  Some things change.  But 1+1 will always be 2, no matter how hard you try to make it 3 or more.

                I don't need a 1000 attempts to prove that you post losing numbers while everyone else posts winning numbers......  Your not the first person to quit posting numbers because you stunk the place up when you did post numbers. People who are filled with negativity cant improve their odds even slightly.


                  United States
                  Member #116272
                  September 7, 2011
                  20244 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: November 30, 2012, 9:04 pm - IP Logged

                  Set of 11 for live play MM. Fri. Nov. 30, 2012.

                  05 08 13 22 24 26 37 38 42 44 47

                  bonus ball 10

                  05 08 13 22 24 26 37 38 42 44 47 48

                  bonus ball 10

                    helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                    u$a
                    United States
                    Member #106669
                    February 22, 2011
                    16991 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: November 30, 2012, 9:28 pm - IP Logged

                    Nice call   helpmewin ............... Im sure it was just aquirk......

                    we'll seeYes Nod just back testing for now, then i'm gonna try them for real Smiley Santa

                                     


                      United States
                      Member #116272
                      September 7, 2011
                      20244 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: November 30, 2012, 9:33 pm - IP Logged

                      Good call...... BETTER ODDS are a sure thing for anyone with a positive attitude......  Dance


                        United States
                        Member #116272
                        September 7, 2011
                        20244 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: November 30, 2012, 9:34 pm - IP Logged

                        I didnt have time to fill out my play slips today for live play..... What are the odds......What?


                          United States
                          Member #116272
                          September 7, 2011
                          20244 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: November 30, 2012, 9:35 pm - IP Logged

                          I didnt have time to fill out my play slips today for live play..... What are the odds......What?

                          I stopped at the station and got this lowly ticket on the way home....

                            helpmewin's avatar - dandy
                            u$a
                            United States
                            Member #106669
                            February 22, 2011
                            16991 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: November 30, 2012, 9:38 pm - IP Logged

                            I stopped at the station and got this lowly ticket on the way home....

                                             


                              United States
                              Member #116272
                              September 7, 2011
                              20244 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: November 30, 2012, 9:40 pm - IP Logged

                                     Yes Nod

                                 
                                Page 162 of 353