The winning combination for the May 2 Texas Pick 3 Night Drawing is '820'
In my substitution workout, the Alpha Signature is 'CAR'
My analysis of appropriate trend lines in several tracking charts, and additional processing, suggested I use Alpha Signature 'ACR' to guide my lottery digit selections.
Other tracking charts, and processing, suggested the best lottery digits to play were '380'
I had two hits and missed the third by one.
Had I been generating combinations for actual play, I would have no doubt played 180, 280 and 380, giving a Box win.
Why did I choose '2'??
In my workout, I have three trend lines that aid the selection of best lottery digits.
In this instance, the Star Chart had too many possibilities.
The primary Follower trend line wasn't very strong for either digit.
So, I went to the third choice - another Follower trend line, that clearly indicated '3' was the best choice.
That's the way it goes with guesswork - sometimes you hit, sometime you miss!!
Here is my third challenge choice for May 4 Texas Pick 3 Morning drawing;
Combination - '397/ACC'
Because the last Alpha Signature was a 'Single', there is no change in the Alpha Double trend lines.
Therefore, I'll stick with my previous analysis indicating the double will be a Double C.
Referring to what I call 'Rap Sheets', there are 10 possible Alpha Signatures with an Alpha C, including 'CCC'
A trend line associated with the chart suggests that the second letter in the Alpha Signature could be 'A', which presented 4 possibilities.
I evaluated the Star Chart for these possibilities and decided that 'ACC' would be best choice for a Straight win.
Other comments.
I don't view the challenge as a 'trick' question because I'm choosing 2 out of 3, or 2 out of 4, digits every time I use my workout to play a pick 3/4 game.
It's routine stuff for me.
Finding the correct answer to multiple What's Next questions is by no means an easy chore.
I have created numerous tracking charts to guide my selections.
Andmy confidence that I can make the right choices grows every time I use the workout, although I'm not winning as often as I would like.
I'm flying solo here.
I wish I had a few contributors but I've more or less given up on the thought that others are willing to try something original, new and different.
I decided that trying to manage 10 digits at once just wasn't worthwhile, as 25 or more years of failed lottery workout history clearly shows.
Instead, I break the game into 3 major parts, with each part having multiple tracking trend lines contributing to the total selection package.
Therefore, all the odds, percentages and other factors being stressed here and elsewhere pertaining to traditional workouts have no meaning to my way of generating combinations for play.
I don't believe there is a mathematical solution, as many so-called experts stress.
I rely on my interpretive abilities, pure and simple.
The odds of this or that happening doesn't apply.
Question: Am I the only one willing to step up and demonstrate a technique that can give good answers to the challenge question??