- Home
- Premium Memberships
- Lottery Results
- Forums
- Predictions
- Lottery Post Videos
- News
- Search Drawings
- Search Lottery Post
- Lottery Systems
- Lottery Charts
- Lottery Wheels
- Worldwide Jackpots
- Quick Picks
- On This Day in History
- Blogs
- Online Games
- Premium Features
- Contact Us
- Whitelist Lottery Post
- Rules
- Lottery Book Store
- Lottery Post Gift Shop
The time is now 10:12 am
You last visited
May 19, 2024, 10:11 am
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)
Digit string projection for P2,P3,P4,P5 Games.Prev TopicNext Topic
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 25, 2023
Also yes but then I consider like you said...
Time frame should be less or equal to target prize , so $6 for 20 draws is still less than the prize.
this is true but what happens when you determine your set timeframe is 20 draws and your sets to play don't hit straight within 20 draws let's say 4/5 times you play in total?
ex.
6$ x 20 draws = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
6$ x 20 = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
6$ x 20 = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
6$ x 20 = 120 expense - didn't get straight hit
so far we are negative $480
5th time we get the straight hit on let's say 16th draw we finally hit it exactly with correct permutation..
6$ x 18 = $108 expense , hit the straight $500 - 108$ expense = 392 profit on that 5th cycle HOWEVER
$392 profit on that 5th cycle of playing
- $480 on all other cycles
= - $88 overall
so what I'm trying to do is optimize to avoid that scenario by increasing chances for straight hit (correct permutation-pattern is hitting but not optimally) over same timeframe, or optimize to avoid this scenario and still profit..
you tell me if the idea/where I'm going with this makes sense when I post my example and what my brain is seeing in my work..
Your math is off> your time frame is 20 , not 100 draws
6 x 20 draws is $ 120 or unless you're waging 20 times each draw.
20 times each draw will be $120
20th draw will amount to 120 x20> is that your angle?
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 25, 2023
Your math is off> your time frame is 20 , not 100 draws
6 x 20 draws is $ 120 or unless you're waging 20 times each draw.
20 times each draw will be $120
20th draw will amount to 120 x20> is that your angle?
ya I think it was a bad example of what I was trying to get at, especially because you'd likely get a couple boxed hits...
What I ment was like..
if you played your 2-4 sets and they didnt hit in your timeframe (6 sets at 6$ x 20 draws) = $120..
then following that you do it all over again with new data + sets and the same thing occurs (or the pattern may hit but it doesnt hit your combination, or your permutation for straight)..
and that happens 4/5 times you attempt to play for a timeframe of 20 draws..
thats basically what I was showing in the example.
Because it doesnt always hit within 20 draws (your exact combo, but it usually will atleast couple boxed hits over that many timeframes) and definitely doesn't always hit as straight.
It was more like "bad scenario" in which you could lose money playing over a timeframe of 20 draws x 5 attempts so yes 120 draws...but 1 of the 5 times you do have the correct permutation and hit the straight, thats what the example showed
Was just trying to show an example where you could be losing money and why to optimize permutation for the straight hit.
I will post an example soon to show some interesting things im finding like I shared soon.
-
Ok lets try and show what I was mentioning about interesting trends I am finding in my data and also additional ideas about permutation…
First lets start with this..
Evening Jan 1-9th
Digit Version
R2
92218
R4
22981
R6
81922
R8
19822
So I used from draw Jan 1- Jan 9th to get to this 4 digit string, and I mentioned how I noticed with some of my strings in my data that ended with 4 digits (instead of down to 3) I was getting more of those quality hits within the string, which is basically what you were filtering for in your examples
I also mentioned doing the additional filtering down to the most prevalent 3 digit combo in the pattern progression and using that (I will go into that even deeper ahead)..
So we look at the below example…
Evening Jan 1-9th
Digit Version
R2
92218
R4
22981
R6
81922
R8
19822
A variation of 198 is most prevalent 3 digit combo in pattern progression, then I go looking for my top pair…
R2
92218
R4
22981
R6
81922
R8
19822
My top pairs are 22 and 81, in fact 22 is more prevalent then 81 but 22 isn’t in our extracted most prevalent 3 digit combo 189 so we take 18 which is associated to our top combo.
Then I said play that top pair as a front pair both ways 189-819… were now filtered down to only 2 combinations and also permutated the combo.
HIT the next draw 189 January 10th and I hit the straight with correct permutation.
Now that is only an idea!
And the reason I was going there is because I am trying to perform permutation on the lowest amount of sets possible…
AND ITS FOR A REASON
Remember I told you I was testing both Digit version and Set version simultaneously?…
I will show you how I am doing this with a different example..
I’ve been testing both digit + set versions week to week just to see how they perform…
For this next example I was at the week where I used draws Feb 2nd – Feb 8th to get down to my 4 digit string for the DIGIT VERSION
Now how I do the SET VERSION is I go backwards from the end of the digit version so draw of feb 8th until my string goes down to 3-4 digits, its usually 4 draws because we know the set version is quicker as it eliminates all digits instead of one at a time..in this example it was draws (feb 8-feb 5th)
So you will see below I get both set and digit versions for the week and test simultaneously side to side (this is what ive been doing with my backtesting to test both simultaneously for same timeframe)…
Evening draws week of Feb 2nd - feb 8th
Digit version (draws feb 2nd-feb 8th) Set version (feb 5- 8)
5418
559911
5841
559911
8154
115599
1854
119955
Now what im finding as I test both at the same time is that sometimes the hit within the string will come within both!
Or more importantly, the hit will come in one but not the other!
This example: HIT feb 19th – 154 and HIT – 159 feb 22nd
So my brain got thinking how can I perhaps take advantage of both and still limit my sets and make this affordable/fit into wagering? That’s where my tinkering with the idea in my first example of filtering down to most prevalent combo in pattern progression, then top pair, for only 2 sets comes from..the data is leading me there!
Now I am wondering I am onto something? Am I possibly increasing my odds at all by doing this?
Like I said its just that I keep seeing many examples where it hits in both or only 1 of the 2 methods!
That was my point about “taking advantage of multiple due patterns for same timeframe” instead of just one!
You know much more about the math, odds, intricacies of draws so I’m wondering what you may think of this?
We saw from your example essentially taking the top pair from R2-R8, playing it front pair with the digits of the string for 3 combos… (targeting that specific pattern within the final string)
Is what im showing not targeting 2 strings for the same timeframe with almost the same amount of sets? (4 sets)
Am I possibly creating an additional advantage by extracting sets from both versions in the same timeframe?
Or despite what I’m seeing am I better off odds wise to just only focus on choosing just digit or set versions? (I think digit tests with better timeframe on its own, more measured+data as you advised and were correct)
I thought you might find this really interesting if not kind of cool haha
Like I have over emphasized its just what I’m seeing happen in the testing of both!
ADDED: I also again wanted to emphasize how the 4 digit strings instead of 3 seem to bring about more hits within the string in my data because of the additional key digit, could this also be an advantage I’m creating as long as your still filtering down? (I was testing 3 vs 4 digit final strings and many hits filtered out with the 3 digit string only)
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 26, 2023
Ok lets try and show what I was mentioning about interesting trends I am finding in my data and also additional ideas about permutation…
First lets start with this..
Evening Jan 1-9th
Digit Version
R2
92218
R4
22981
R6
81922
R8
19822
So I used from draw Jan 1- Jan 9th to get to this 4 digit string, and I mentioned how I noticed with some of my strings in my data that ended with 4 digits (instead of down to 3) I was getting more of those quality hits within the string, which is basically what you were filtering for in your examples
I also mentioned doing the additional filtering down to the most prevalent 3 digit combo in the pattern progression and using that (I will go into that even deeper ahead)..
So we look at the below example…
Evening Jan 1-9th
Digit Version
R2
92218
R4
22981
R6
81922
R8
19822
A variation of 198 is most prevalent 3 digit combo in pattern progression, then I go looking for my top pair…
R2
92218
R4
22981
R6
81922
R8
19822
My top pairs are 22 and 81, in fact 22 is more prevalent then 81 but 22 isn’t in our extracted most prevalent 3 digit combo 189 so we take 18 which is associated to our top combo.
Then I said play that top pair as a front pair both ways 189-819… were now filtered down to only 2 combinations and also permutated the combo.
HIT the next draw 189 January 10th and I hit the straight with correct permutation.
Now that is only an idea!
And the reason I was going there is because I am trying to perform permutation on the lowest amount of sets possible…
AND ITS FOR A REASON
Remember I told you I was testing both Digit version and Set version simultaneously?…
I will show you how I am doing this with a different example..
I’ve been testing both digit + set versions week to week just to see how they perform…
For this next example I was at the week where I used draws Feb 2nd – Feb 8th to get down to my 4 digit string for the DIGIT VERSION
Now how I do the SET VERSION is I go backwards from the end of the digit version so draw of feb 8th until my string goes down to 3-4 digits, its usually 4 draws because we know the set version is quicker as it eliminates all digits instead of one at a time..in this example it was draws (feb 8-feb 5th)
So you will see below I get both set and digit versions for the week and test simultaneously side to side (this is what ive been doing with my backtesting to test both simultaneously for same timeframe)…
Evening draws week of Feb 2nd - feb 8th
Digit version (draws feb 2nd-feb 8th) Set version (feb 5- 8)
5418
559911
5841
559911
8154
115599
1854
119955
Now what im finding as I test both at the same time is that sometimes the hit within the string will come within both!
Or more importantly, the hit will come in one but not the other!
This example: HIT feb 19th – 154 and HIT – 159 feb 22nd
So my brain got thinking how can I perhaps take advantage of both and still limit my sets and make this affordable/fit into wagering? That’s where my tinkering with the idea in my first example of filtering down to most prevalent combo in pattern progression, then top pair, for only 2 sets comes from..the data is leading me there!
Now I am wondering I am onto something? Am I possibly increasing my odds at all by doing this?
Like I said its just that I keep seeing many examples where it hits in both or only 1 of the 2 methods!
That was my point about “taking advantage of multiple due patterns for same timeframe” instead of just one!
You know much more about the math, odds, intricacies of draws so I’m wondering what you may think of this?
We saw from your example essentially taking the top pair from R2-R8, playing it front pair with the digits of the string for 3 combos… (targeting that specific pattern within the final string)
Is what im showing not targeting 2 strings for the same timeframe with almost the same amount of sets? (4 sets)
Am I possibly creating an additional advantage by extracting sets from both versions in the same timeframe?
Or despite what I’m seeing am I better off odds wise to just only focus on choosing just digit or set versions? (I think digit tests with better timeframe on its own, more measured+data as you advised and were correct)
I thought you might find this really interesting if not kind of cool haha
Like I have over emphasized its just what I’m seeing happen in the testing of both!
ADDED: I also again wanted to emphasize how the 4 digit strings instead of 3 seem to bring about more hits within the string in my data because of the additional key digit, could this also be an advantage I’m creating as long as your still filtering down? (I was testing 3 vs 4 digit final strings and many hits filtered out with the 3 digit string only)
Well said, the string size is flexible. Shorter strings (you may lose a data) has clear observable front pairs.
I kept it 3(P3) as a base , wondering off much leads to unnecessary additional data. The idea is focus as a laser.
Anyway, waging a combo 123 in anyway is 6 sets> your spending a dollar each for str8 hit> you spend $6 a draw>20 draws> 120.
Workout for you: Do progression for ONTARIO DAY draws from dates oct 1 to oct 6
just use a set filter to ease explanation.
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 26, 2023
Well said, the string size is flexible. Shorter strings (you may lose a data) has clear observable front pairs.
I kept it 3(P3) as a base , wondering off much leads to unnecessary additional data. The idea is focus as a laser.
Anyway, waging a combo 123 in anyway is 6 sets> your spending a dollar each for str8 hit> you spend $6 a draw>20 draws> 120.
Workout for you: Do progression for ONTARIO DAY draws from dates oct 1 to oct 6
just use a set filter to ease explanation.
Anytime you find yourself picking many sets, stop and re adjust .
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 26, 2023
Well said, the string size is flexible. Shorter strings (you may lose a data) has clear observable front pairs.
I kept it 3(P3) as a base , wondering off much leads to unnecessary additional data. The idea is focus as a laser.
Anyway, waging a combo 123 in anyway is 6 sets> your spending a dollar each for str8 hit> you spend $6 a draw>20 draws> 120.
Workout for you: Do progression for ONTARIO DAY draws from dates oct 1 to oct 6
just use a set filter to ease explanation.
ok thanks!
Ya I am still evaluating the data and may determine maybe it still hits enough to stick with the 3 digit string (laser down), only play one version (digit), and play all 6 ways to ensure the straight for sure! (maybe not ideal but you hit it for sure and do you get it enough it's worth it?)
maybe I'm getting greedy? I am just noticing it hit quite often with the 4 digit, and even way more often considering both versions, was trying to figure out if theres a reasonable way to leverage all that...
or even just stick to the inital filtering you showed with the top pair played as a front pair with remaining digits of the string making up your sets..does this hit straight often enough? I think I will try to determine these things it just takes alot of time.
I think what makes it so interesting is to see the hits with a system that produces such low quantity sets so it makes me want to learn how to take advantage of those data points I outlined. I kind of wish I understand combinations, wheeling, and permutation better but thought I was atleast onto something decent?
Eventually I'd like to move onto Pick 4 and master that but im not as familiar, I think that's my ultimate goal at some point and when this could get really interesting
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 26, 2023
Well said, the string size is flexible. Shorter strings (you may lose a data) has clear observable front pairs.
I kept it 3(P3) as a base , wondering off much leads to unnecessary additional data. The idea is focus as a laser.
Anyway, waging a combo 123 in anyway is 6 sets> your spending a dollar each for str8 hit> you spend $6 a draw>20 draws> 120.
Workout for you: Do progression for ONTARIO DAY draws from dates oct 1 to oct 6
just use a set filter to ease explanation.
"Workout for you: Do progression for ONTARIO DAY draws from dates oct 1 to oct 6
just use a set filter to ease explanation"
ok starting Oct 1 midday - 708 to Oct 6 - 496
21133
'23311
'11332
'11332
113-311-113-113 /133-331-133-133/ 233-332-332 / 211
top pairs- tier 1 -11, 33, 13 / tier 2- 32
see in the way you do it by taking the most prevalent top pair... I wanted to ask in the case like in this example where 11,33,13 are all tied does 11 take prevalence at all as top front pair as it appears the most "front" within strings?
if so (pair 11 played with digits in string) : 112, 113 sets to play
if not (all top pairs played with digits in string): 112,113, 331, 332, 131, 132, 133 set to play
interesting this one turned out to be mainly doubles
how does that look?
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 26, 2023
"Workout for you: Do progression for ONTARIO DAY draws from dates oct 1 to oct 6
just use a set filter to ease explanation"
ok starting Oct 1 midday - 708 to Oct 6 - 496
21133
'23311
'11332
'11332
113-311-113-113 /133-331-133-133/ 233-332-332 / 211
top pairs- tier 1 -11, 33, 13 / tier 2- 32
see in the way you do it by taking the most prevalent top pair... I wanted to ask in the case like in this example where 11,33,13 are all tied does 11 take prevalence at all as top front pair as it appears the most "front" within strings?
if so (pair 11 played with digits in string) : 112, 113 sets to play
if not (all top pairs played with digits in string): 112,113, 331, 332, 131, 132, 133 set to play
interesting this one turned out to be mainly doubles
how does that look?
this brings up something I noticed in my data..
though this system is good for finding the "doubles pair" the 3rd digit when its a doubles hit is very often not in the string..
unlike with the 3 digit hits which are often all within the string..
Is there a good way to come up with the optimal 3rd digit to match with the double pair that hits (via string) if I'm noticing this?
Or if you weren't going to use a digit from the string as the 3rd digit which could you use?
or maybe this is something I am seeing temporarily?
it makes me want to somewhat stay away from playing doubles because the timeframe is longer and hits more inconsistent
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 27, 2023
this brings up something I noticed in my data..
though this system is good for finding the "doubles pair" the 3rd digit when its a doubles hit is very often not in the string..
unlike with the 3 digit hits which are often all within the string..
Is there a good way to come up with the optimal 3rd digit to match with the double pair that hits (via string) if I'm noticing this?
Or if you weren't going to use a digit from the string as the 3rd digit which could you use?
or maybe this is something I am seeing temporarily?
it makes me want to somewhat stay away from playing doubles because the timeframe is longer and hits more inconsistent
to follow up again why i think doubles are a waste, here in Ontario the odds are like this..
Two of the three digits are identical and the remaining one digit is unique and different (e.g. 010, 223, 455, etc.) 3 x Box Play prize Prize Pool / Number of Box Play winning shares + (3 x number of Straight Play winning shares) 1 in 333 Three digits of the winning number are unique and different (e.g. 123, 246, 978 etc) 6 x Box Play prize Prize Pool / Number of Box Play winning shares + (6 x number of Straight Play winning shares) 1 in 167 so even though a double will pay more boxed like over $200 for a straight hit its that prize amount x 3 = $600
and on average the 6 way boxed will pay $80-90 and x6 that ammount = $500
so yes its abit less money, but only by $100, for double better odds overall, and way more occurrence and therefore better timeframe
unless you determine playing for boxed doubles is good value?
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 27, 2023
to follow up again why i think doubles are a waste, here in Ontario the odds are like this..
Two of the three digits are identical and the remaining one digit is unique and different (e.g. 010, 223, 455, etc.) 3 x Box Play prize Prize Pool / Number of Box Play winning shares + (3 x number of Straight Play winning shares) 1 in 333 Three digits of the winning number are unique and different (e.g. 123, 246, 978 etc) 6 x Box Play prize Prize Pool / Number of Box Play winning shares + (6 x number of Straight Play winning shares) 1 in 167 so even though a double will pay more boxed like over $200 for a straight hit its that prize amount x 3 = $600
and on average the 6 way boxed will pay $80-90 and x6 that ammount = $500
so yes its abit less money, but only by $100, for double better odds overall, and way more occurrence and therefore better timeframe
unless you determine playing for boxed doubles is good value?
You should focus more on pattern projections to get the parameters (pairs, doubles etc) right . On the average doubles and distinct draws occurs in similar rate ( normal distribution). Trying to win every draw is not going to happen, all you need is a good hit. Remember , the odds is stack against you, pattern projection is a narrow opening to capitalize.
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 27, 2023
You should focus more on pattern projections to get the parameters (pairs, doubles etc) right . On the average doubles and distinct draws occurs in similar rate ( normal distribution). Trying to win every draw is not going to happen, all you need is a good hit. Remember , the odds is stack against you, pattern projection is a narrow opening to capitalize.
yeah i think this is what i need to get a feel for more I'm practicing.
I did the workout you suggested, did you want to build more of it or to proceed with it further?...
ok starting Oct 1 midday - 708 to Oct 6 - 496
21133
'23311
'11332
'11332
113-311-113-113 /133-331-133-133/ 233-332-332 / 211
top pairs- tier 1 -11, 33, 13 / tier 2- 32
see in the way you do it by taking the most prevalent top pair... I wanted to ask in the case like in this example where 11,33,13 are all tied does 11 take prevalence at all as top front pair as it appears the most "front" within strings?
if so (pair 11 played with digits in string) : 112, 113 sets to play
if not (all top pairs played with digits in string): 112,113, 331, 332, 131, 132, 133 set to play
interesting this one turned out to be mainly doubles
how does that look?
-
Quote: Originally posted by adobea78 on Nov 27, 2023
You should focus more on pattern projections to get the parameters (pairs, doubles etc) right . On the average doubles and distinct draws occurs in similar rate ( normal distribution). Trying to win every draw is not going to happen, all you need is a good hit. Remember , the odds is stack against you, pattern projection is a narrow opening to capitalize.
Honestly I'm starting to notice my timeframe is abit all over the place and I'm struggle with permutation so feeling abit more lost and how to use this the best way...
It looked really good at first..
when testing for October as I test each week roughly...
there was 4 times there was a hit within the string...
3 of the 4 the hit came a month later...
1 of the times the hit came after 8 draws?
like am I suppose to play the sets for a full month hoping the hit comes? that seems really long and like I said theres a good chance I wont hit the correct permutation..that was a discouraging month of testing
the permutation is vital if the hit isn't going to come for a full month
Could you share any further tips from your experience on timeframe? or how to resolve this?
now I feel abit stuck :(
when I focus on just the top pairs they come in a shorter timeframe but not with digits within the string..
if you could share anything would be appreciated, feel alittle bit stuck and would like to keep working
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 28, 2023
Honestly I'm starting to notice my timeframe is abit all over the place and I'm struggle with permutation so feeling abit more lost and how to use this the best way...
It looked really good at first..
when testing for October as I test each week roughly...
there was 4 times there was a hit within the string...
3 of the 4 the hit came a month later...
1 of the times the hit came after 8 draws?
like am I suppose to play the sets for a full month hoping the hit comes? that seems really long and like I said theres a good chance I wont hit the correct permutation..that was a discouraging month of testing
the permutation is vital if the hit isn't going to come for a full month
Could you share any further tips from your experience on timeframe? or how to resolve this?
now I feel abit stuck :(
when I focus on just the top pairs they come in a shorter timeframe but not with digits within the string..
if you could share anything would be appreciated, feel alittle bit stuck and would like to keep working
let me show example I did and example for whole month of October Ontario Midday..
Oct 1-6th
21133 '23311 '11332 '11332 HIT - Nov 6th 321
oct 7 - 12th
44886 '68844 '68844 '88644 HIT - Nov 12 846
Oct 13- 19th
5990033 '5990033 '0059933 '0099335 HIT but only with 4 digit string - 503 Nov 10
Oct 20 - 26th
9467 '9647 '6794 '7964
HIT but only 4 digit string - Nov 4 697
Oct 27th - nov 2nd
22338 '22833 '83322 '83322 NO HIT
so you see its a variation of:
- Often times timeframe over a month
-Half the time hit 3 digit string / half the time 4 digit string - which one to use? inconsistent
- Sometimes no hit at all
-Most times not hitting as a straight
I am trying to understand how to mitigate or optimize for all these variations? hit straights where its still fits into wagering while not playing too many sets? what if you are playing the times it doesn't hit?
Any input or suggestions would be appreciated thank you!
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Nov 29, 2023
let me show example I did and example for whole month of October Ontario Midday..
Oct 1-6th
21133 '23311 '11332 '11332 HIT - Nov 6th 321
oct 7 - 12th
44886 '68844 '68844 '88644 HIT - Nov 12 846
Oct 13- 19th
5990033 '5990033 '0059933 '0099335 HIT but only with 4 digit string - 503 Nov 10
Oct 20 - 26th
9467 '9647 '6794 '7964
HIT but only 4 digit string - Nov 4 697
Oct 27th - nov 2nd
22338 '22833 '83322 '83322 NO HIT
so you see its a variation of:
- Often times timeframe over a month
-Half the time hit 3 digit string / half the time 4 digit string - which one to use? inconsistent
- Sometimes no hit at all
-Most times not hitting as a straight
I am trying to understand how to mitigate or optimize for all these variations? hit straights where its still fits into wagering while not playing too many sets? what if you are playing the times it doesn't hit?
Any input or suggestions would be appreciated thank you!
here's the results for evening draw month of October, I even tried something new...
Looking for patterns within the strings along the 7 day period as the strings are reduced and picking out 3 digit patterns I am seeing...
Oct 1-8th
4486 '6844 '6844 '8644 so for this 3 digit string there was double 44, there was also 4 in the final Set version for this time frame surrounded by 1, so that could've been a trigger
HIT - Oct 13th - 441
now here are the sets I formed from just observing patterns...digit version -244-186-441 / sets version - 162-624
HIT Oct 13 - 441
HIT Oct 23 - 612
HIT Oct 17 - 246
Oct 9-15th
9938 - 3 digit string '9983 '8993 '9983 99386 - 4 digit string '99683 '68993 '99836 HIT Oct 19- 998*
HIT Nov 4 - 968
99 and 77 were the top doubles in sets version for timeframe (99 also in digit version above - hit 998*) also HIT Nov 8th 747
also as for the 3 digit patterns I picked out from the week...digit version 990-836-901 / sets version 967
HIT Oct 18 - 091
HIT Nov 9 - 910
Oct 16 - 21st
3367 '6337 '6733 '7336 abit less happening on this week...you will see the double 33 trigger and it came out a triple (don't think id ever bet that) HIT Nov 7 - 333
3 digit patterns I picked out from the week.. Digit - 833 - 386 / Set- 536
HIT Nov 16 - 536
Is this more consistent then lasering down to the 3 digit string?! hmmmm interesting
Oct 22- 27th
9467 '9647 '6794 '7964 HIT Nov 28 - 467
see what I mean alot of these come out after over a month timeframe..
3 digit patterns picked out...Set- 936 / Digit 344-634.. no hits this time
Oct 28- Nov 4th
1387 '8371 '8173 '7183 the strings a day prior
138867 '688371 '688173 '718836 88 is triggering as it stuck around for 6 days and also 88 is top pair in the set version...perhaps these are special triggers I can start paying attention to and optimizing on more?..
HIT Nov 5 880
3 digit patterns...Set- 683-688-388 / digit 688-173-138
As a lot of hits have a month or over a month timeframe perhaps give a bit more time for the last one..
Some interesting stuff!
still learning how to best extract all these triggers and hits
-
Quote: Originally posted by carter7 on Dec 1, 2023
here's the results for evening draw month of October, I even tried something new...
Looking for patterns within the strings along the 7 day period as the strings are reduced and picking out 3 digit patterns I am seeing...
Oct 1-8th
4486 '6844 '6844 '8644 so for this 3 digit string there was double 44, there was also 4 in the final Set version for this time frame surrounded by 1, so that could've been a trigger
HIT - Oct 13th - 441
now here are the sets I formed from just observing patterns...digit version -244-186-441 / sets version - 162-624
HIT Oct 13 - 441
HIT Oct 23 - 612
HIT Oct 17 - 246
Oct 9-15th
9938 - 3 digit string '9983 '8993 '9983 99386 - 4 digit string '99683 '68993 '99836 HIT Oct 19- 998*
HIT Nov 4 - 968
99 and 77 were the top doubles in sets version for timeframe (99 also in digit version above - hit 998*) also HIT Nov 8th 747
also as for the 3 digit patterns I picked out from the week...digit version 990-836-901 / sets version 967
HIT Oct 18 - 091
HIT Nov 9 - 910
Oct 16 - 21st
3367 '6337 '6733 '7336 abit less happening on this week...you will see the double 33 trigger and it came out a triple (don't think id ever bet that) HIT Nov 7 - 333
3 digit patterns I picked out from the week.. Digit - 833 - 386 / Set- 536
HIT Nov 16 - 536
Is this more consistent then lasering down to the 3 digit string?! hmmmm interesting
Oct 22- 27th
9467 '9647 '6794 '7964 HIT Nov 28 - 467
see what I mean alot of these come out after over a month timeframe..
3 digit patterns picked out...Set- 936 / Digit 344-634.. no hits this time
Oct 28- Nov 4th
1387 '8371 '8173 '7183 the strings a day prior
138867 '688371 '688173 '718836 88 is triggering as it stuck around for 6 days and also 88 is top pair in the set version...perhaps these are special triggers I can start paying attention to and optimizing on more?..
HIT Nov 5 880
3 digit patterns...Set- 683-688-388 / digit 688-173-138
As a lot of hits have a month or over a month timeframe perhaps give a bit more time for the last one..
Some interesting stuff!
still learning how to best extract all these triggers and hits
Try using LP positional wheel to filter your picks> A parameter from pattern projections will give you 4 picks.