<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>A possiblle new &#x22;Followers&#x22; EXCLUDE prediction technique.</title>
		<link>/blogentry/19002</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/19002" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>LANTERN's Blog: A possiblle new &#x22;Followers&#x22; EXCLUDE prediction technique.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #4</title>
			<link>/blogentry/19002#c18233</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/19002#c18233</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:32:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Thanks, it is too soon for me to tell how things will workout and in which way they will.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;But you are or was dealing either with single digits by position (10) and or pairs by position (100) and or whole pick 3 numbers by position (1000) and also with only 1 predicted pick 3 number, so things are harder in that way.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;With the LDR I will be dealing with only 10 patterns for whole pick 3 numbers, with Roots with only 9 or 10 patterns, it will or might be harder when working with fil... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/19002#c18233">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #3</title>
			<link>/blogentry/19002#c18221</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/19002#c18221</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The system I used when I became aware of this was the &#x22;vertical pair&#x22; system, I noticed that it wasn&#x27;t the hottest or coldest number that came out, but one of the ones in the middle.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;We are in a race to find the MOST or LEAST of something, while the numbers are trying to average themselves out.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;My LRS version 1 was a skip-based system&#x3c;br /&#x3e;PRO-file was a follower based system&#x3c;br /&#x3e;I combined them in LRSv2 and still it couldn&#x27;t beat the history of the games in PA... wasn&#x27;t until I intro... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/19002#c18221">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>/blogentry/19002#c18217</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/19002#c18217</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 08:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;I have a much easier technique, but I am looking for something more for sure, more secure, something that might fail less often, As I have only taken a very quick look at this, I don&#x27;t know yet how I will use what I have seen and what I might yet find, I only took a very quick look at 2 or 3 patterns of the LDR filter and only followed them for 1 to 2 months of past draws, I didn&#x27;t know what I was going to find, I found good and bad stuff, but mostly good, it is too soon to know anything f... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/19002#c18217">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>/blogentry/19002#c18214</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/19002#c18214</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 03:10:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>bobby623</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you are open to a suggestion, why not just quit trying to reverse engineer the lottery computer or ball machines. Instead, why not develope a substitute system. I have a system I call - gap strategy. Very easy to set up and maintain. I don&#x27;t try to second guess the lottery machines. I use my own system to generate combinations that I play. I don&#x27;t win everytime, but no one does. I&#x27;m having more success with Pick 3. I&#x27;ve won $40 four times in the past month. I think finding patterns with just the winning numbers will require a lot of your time, but not give you what you are looking for. Just thought.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/19002#c18214">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>bobby623</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: A possiblle new &#x22;Followers&#x22; EXCLUDE prediction technique.</title>
			<link>/blogentry/19002</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/19002</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:57:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p></p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/19002</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

