Welcome Guest
( Log In | Register )
The time is now 11:11 pm
You last visited October 22, 2017, 10:31 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

A possiblle new "Followers" EXCLUDE prediction technique.


Last Edited: September 22, 2007, 5:05 pm

L is for the way you look at me
O is for the only one I see
V is very, very extraordinary
E is even more than anyone that you adore can

Love is all that I can give to you
Love is more than just a game for two
Two in love can make it
Take my heart and please dont break it
Love was made for me and you


It is time to begin to explore a "Followers" EXCLUDE kind of prediction technique.

A few people here seem to have their own version of this.

Mine if developed to some degree, at all, will be based on filters' patterns.

This would make such a thing even more complicated as there are very many patterns, I would need to study a great very many past draws countless times over and over and over, this is due to working such thing by hand, the very hard way.

There appears to be no other way to do this, without proper software, that is, there is software for looking at the patterns, but not for the "Followers" part of the method or system.

Might as well do things the hard way, at least in this way, I will be the only one who will be able to do this, people who make programs and or spreadsheets want to either sell them or give them away, I would like to keep this private, besides it might be too complicated for others to understand anyway, I only have the beginning ideas at this point so I am not sure yet exactly how this will be developed for prediction, there are some many things to look at and try.

It needs so very many past draws and I would have to very slowly go over them over and over and over so very many times, the thing is to learn the "Random Rules" for working with each one of the filters patterns in this "Followers" way, the general random rules of followers for each single patterns, it would be a lot of hard work, I would have to work with 1 pattern of a filter at a time, for example the LDR filter has 10 patterns, so I would have to study 1 of the ten patterns first and then another and then another until all of the 10 are done, then move to another filters and start with it all over again.

That is the basic technique and advanced technique if ever done would be a cross reference technique between patterns and or filters, way too complicated to do without proper software.

The basic technique first, it will be follower patterns and their skips.

This will go very slowly as it is almost impossible work by hand.

Entry #158


bobby623Comment by bobby623 - September 22, 2007, 11:10 pm
If you are open to a suggestion, why not just quit trying to reverse engineer the lottery computer or ball machines. Instead, why not develope a substitute system. I have a system I call - gap strategy. Very easy to set up and maintain. I don't try to second guess the lottery machines. I use my own system to generate combinations that I play. I don't win everytime, but no one does. I'm having more success with Pick 3. I've won $40 four times in the past month. I think finding patterns with just the winning numbers will require a lot of your time, but not give you what you are looking for. Just thought.
LANTERNComment by LANTERN - September 23, 2007, 4:10 am

I have a much easier technique, but I am looking for something more for sure, more secure, something that might fail less often, As I have only taken a very quick look at this, I don't know yet how I will use what I have seen and what I might yet find, I only took a very quick look at 2 or 3 patterns of the LDR filter and only followed them for 1 to 2 months of past draws, I didn't know what I was going to find, I found good and bad stuff, but mostly good, it is too soon to know anything for sure, this was done for the Tx Midday pick 3 game, since I have to start somewhere and the LDR filter is one of the best of them and has 10 "Equal" patterns, I will start with it, a lot more testing will be needed, as hard as this is, is not so hard, since I will be looking at LDR patterns generated from the draws by a program, otherwise I would not be able to do this, as without the program I would have to make the patterns myself by hand and I just could not do that, not for the needed number of draws.
I am looking for a more failsafe way of predicting numbers with filters,
As I said, I don't yet know in which way or ways I will use the data that I will find, I don't know yet either if I will be able to develop a more stable or solid way of predicting with filters, my very quick look at following 2 or 3 LDR patterns across 1 to 2 months of draws showed good and bad data, but mostly good, not all filters might be of use in this way, but I don't know yet, I didn't take a look at the skips of this thing yet and I only took a quick look at the first follower, for the LDR filter I should look at maybe 3 to 8 followers to see what I might find of use there if anything.
Maybe unlike others who use followers I am not looking so much for INCLUDE patterns, but more for useful EXCLUDE patterns, while I don't know much about Tenaj's prediction technique I did get this idea from reading one of two of her posts and also a few of hypersoniq's, but this is not the same thing as they are doing, just a similar spin or a spin-off.
You want to know what this is all about? It is a thing of What follows what? And in Which way such data can be used for INCLUDE and or EXCLUDE prediction? Simple enough!
Thanks for your post and also thanks a lot for the advice.
Good luck.
hypersoniqComment by hypersoniq - September 23, 2007, 1:20 pm
when you look for following patterns, the MOST frequent and the LEAST frequent represent a small fraction of the possibilities, the MaGiC is in the "middle". I'm still looking for a way to capitalize on this...
The system I used when I became aware of this was the "vertical pair" system, I noticed that it wasn't the hottest or coldest number that came out, but one of the ones in the middle.
We are in a race to find the MOST or LEAST of something, while the numbers are trying to average themselves out.
My LRS version 1 was a skip-based system
PRO-file was a follower based system
I combined them in LRSv2 and still it couldn't beat the history of the games in PA... wasn't until I introduced yet another component into the mix that I ended up with LRSv3 that can beat ANY p3/p4game's history, BUT the hits have gaps that are too far apart. sometimes the hits are almost 2 years apart, sometimes twice in 1 month...
it IS slow work, took me 5 years to get to where I'm at now... still not ahead of the game...
We gotta figure out something for the MIDDLE, for in there are the majority of next draws.
Remember, I have extra self-imposed restrictions of having to generate ONLY one STRAIGHT pick for any game.

Bottom line, look to the middle for the hits, because they don't come from the high or low frequencies enough to make a system of them.

good luck!
LANTERNComment by LANTERN - September 23, 2007, 6:32 pm

Thanks, it is too soon for me to tell how things will workout and in which way they will.
But you are or was dealing either with single digits by position (10) and or pairs by position (100) and or whole pick 3 numbers by position (1000) and also with only 1 predicted pick 3 number, so things are harder in that way.
With the LDR I will be dealing with only 10 patterns for whole pick 3 numbers, with Roots with only 9 or 10 patterns, it will or might be harder when working with filters whose patterns don't each "Hold" the same numbers of combos.
Such as Sums, Widths and others, the Straight High-Low and the Straight Even-Odd do hold equal number of combos per each pattern, so do the Boxed Mostly High-Low and Mostly Even-Odd patterns.
I don't know, but perhaps you was working only with "First Followers", I will also look at 25 to 50 % of the followers for each pattern.
First Followers, later I will look at the Skips, it would be harder if I was trying to make whole pick 3 numbers out of Followers of digits by position or of pairs by position, but I am not trying to make predicted numbers in that way, I will only be working with either Exclude or Include filters patterns, as that has always been my prediction technique.
So for the LDR filter I will be dealing with 10 patterns, the LDR 0, LDR 1 etc up to LDR 9, with straight High-Low this would be: 8 Patterns:
Not as hard perhaps as what you are doing, that is if you only doing a few patterns, but it gets hard and complicated the more filters' patterns that are done.
Anyhow this is a long term project.
I will work with only 1 filter at a time.
These all are for use with a filters program such as the FreeWheeler as for the patterns, LotSoft or some other such program that makes patterns out of draws can be used.
These of course does not explain exactly what I will do, but at this point I don't even know myself, it all depends on what I find.

You must be a Lottery Post member to post comments to a Blog.

Register for a FREE membership, or if you're already a member please Log In.