<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Always on the lookout for new ideas, here is one such idea...</title>
		<link>/blogentry/193902</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/193902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>hypersoniq's Blog: Always on the lookout for new ideas, here is one such idea...</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>/blogentry/193902#c279948</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/193902#c279948</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 18:44:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>There is also the possibility to run the Cash 4 Life data through a &#x22;one off&#x22; next draw system such as the Follower script previously used on the PA Match 6... one draw is cheaper than 26, only $8 to brute force the cash balls...</p>]]></description>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Always on the lookout for new ideas, here is one such idea...</title>
			<link>/blogentry/193902</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/193902</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>hypersoniq</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In the Cash 4 Life classifier, I have been using 1.5 standard deviations as an upper and lower cutoff for hot and cold.<br /><br />As an alternative, I could apply an IQR (inter quartile range) where anything above or below the range given by Q3-Q1 would be the new outliers.<br /><br />In the pick 3, one standard deviation above and below the expectancy does the trick. In the non replacement draw of the C4L, which has a moving expectancy and a wider range, the standard deviation may be too wild of a setpoint, where the IQR can provide a more consistent range.<br /><br />I may have to plot out a comparison to visualize the difference. The problem is too many neutrals, this solution may be better than the current one. I need to get this part right before the long process of back testing.<br /><br />3 draws remain on the initial Cash 4 Life 26 draw test... 3 of the numbers have appeared individually for a total of 6 matches. I did bad on the pick part of the neutrals... my phase 2 basically does not work.<br /><br />In 6 weeks of pick 3 testing, there has only been 1 hit. I have 3 weeks remaining of house money for the pick 3 @$14/wk. That will be a 9 week run on the idea with a net zero out of pocket, including 2 shots at the pick 5 and the C4L experiment.<br /><br />Though I have tested much worse systems, I need to do better than 1 hit in 6 weeks on that pick 3 to ever have another shot at the pick 5 and C4L... it is looking like those last 3 free weeks will be using the all neutral QP generator, as I have yet to identify any progress on a different phase 2 strategy.<br /><br />Visualization did NOT help as much as I hoped it would. 3 more weeks of trying and then I am again faced with decision time... keep going or pull the plug and work on a different phase 2 process. I did get to keep a bit of profit as well, so if I stop in 3 weeks, I would end up ahead...... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/193902">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>hypersoniq</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/193902</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

