<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mega Millions After-thoughts</title>
		<link>/blogentry/27750</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/27750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>LottoVantage's Blog: Mega Millions After-thoughts</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Mega Millions After-thoughts</title>
			<link>/blogentry/27750</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/27750</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:23:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LottoVantage</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed - all four numbers from the upper tier group are found in the first (11) strings of numbers. The exception range of 141 was only (10) elements away from the actual sum of 131, pretty good considering the total sum range of 15 to 270 for Mega Millions.<br /><br />Then consider there was (1) repeat number 28, (2) super hot numbers 01-27, and (2) hot numbers 35-40. This mix seems rather unusual, excluding any due or cold numbers.<br /><br />Now then, lets consider something else here. First off, filtering any group of numbers down to a single (sum total) is as extreme as it gets using sum filtering. Cost is the deciding factor here. If a sum range of 131 - 141 had been applied, would the cost/profit factor have improved? Probably not. Why? Because the amount of number strings to wager would most probably have out weighed any prize amount possible. Four numbers minus the gold ball pays $150.00. Three numbers minus the gold ball pays $7.00. In the first place, we are applying a 4if5of28 wheel here for our results. It is fairly unlikely that a (4) match could have been achieved with only four numbers appearing in the mix, although that is possible of happening, and has happened in our experience. If (5) numbers had appeared in the mix, it would have been possible to experience a (5) match, and possibly even a (4) match and several (3) matches.<br /><br />In order to stay in the game, have some fun, and possibly get lucky and win something substantual, the extreme filtering process is the way to go. For the remainder of those with unlimited assets, if you have a new ink cartridge in your printer, most deffinately go the opposite extreme route and hope for the best.<br /><br />In closing this up, let me just express that I find utilizing extreme measures of accomplishing my goals much more enjoyable, and habit forming, than traveling the easy paved route.<br /><br />Tuesday 02/24/2009<br /><br />01-27-28-35-40 06<br /><br />Total Sum - 131<br /><br />There were four numbers from the upper tier group<br /><br />of numbers, and one number from the lower tier<br /><br />group of numbers. The total sum gravitated from 190<br /><br />to 131 for this drawing. The estimated total sum of<br /><br />141 was excessively distanced from the actual total<br /><br />sum to bring any worthwhile prize.<br /><br />There are four (2) match s from the upper tier group<br /><br />of numbers, zero matches from the lower tier group<br /><br />of numbers.<br /><br />There is no active Target Sum Range to<br /><br />assist in selecting a viable sum range for<br /><br />this evenings drawing. An exception is<br /><br />being utilized, and, included here, is the<br /><br />way the exception was accomplished<br /><br />We took the Mid Sum Range of 142.5,<br /><br />added the Avg Sum Range of 139.8 and<br /><br />divided by (2) giving us the sum of 141.<br /><br />This exception will give us a reasonable<br /><br />target to shoot at in tonight s drawing.<br /><br />This is best described as just another<br /><br />way to legitimately stay in the game<br /><br />and have a little fun when the statistics<br /><br />are in a dormant stage and of no help.<br /><br />Another thing to consider is the fact that<br /><br />if the 38 hits, the winnings will be double<br /><br />all the money wagered.<br /><br />Mega Millions<br /><br />For Tuesday 02-24-2009<br /><br />(Upper Tier Group) Number Strings - 21<br /><br />Sum Range 141<br /><br />01-11-28-46-55 38<br /><br />01-23-28-41-48 38<br /><br />01-23-28-43-46 38<br /><br />01-25-28-41-46 38<br /><br />02-11-25-51-52 38<br /><br />02-16-22-46-55 38<br /><br />09-12-33-35-52 38<br /><br />09-13-33-35-51 38<br /><br />09-16-21-43-52 38<br /><br />09-19-23-39-51 38<br /><br />10-16-27-33-55 38<br /><br />10-16-35-39-41 38<br /><br />11-21-23-35-51 38<br /><br />11-22-27-29-52 38<br /><br />11-23-33-35-39 38<br /><br />12-21-22-35-51 38<br /><br />15-16-22-33-55 38<br /><br />16-21-22-39-43 38<br /><br />19-21-22-27-52 38<br /><br />19-21-22-28-51 38<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/27750">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>LottoVantage</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/27750</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

