<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Odds and probability are two different things...</title>
		<link>/blogentry/46071</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/46071" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>WIN  D's Blog: Odds and probability are two different things...</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: Odds and probability are two different things...</title>
			<link>/blogentry/46071</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/46071</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 12:40:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>WIN  D</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>1) There are around 387 unique combinations in the last 500 draws, at any given moment in a lottery history. 387/500 = 77.4%.<br /><br />2) There are around 494 unique combinations in the last 692 draws. 494/692 = 71.4%.<br /><br />3) There are around629 unique combinations in the last 1000 draws. 629/1000 = 62.9%.<br /><br />4) There are around 772 unique combinations in the last 1500 draws. 772/1500 = 51.5%.<br /><br />5) There are around 850 unique combinations in the last 2000 draws. 850/2000 = 42.5%. (The sweet spot , or the most bang for the buck . Play 85% of the outcomes, for a success frequency of around &#x27;9 out of 10&#x27;. Increase, you said? You mean, the bet after losses or too few wins? You make the call. My call may be expensive for you )<br /><br />6) There are around 950 unique combinations in the last 3000 draws. 950/3000 = 31.7%.<br /><br />The random combinations strongly follow the tendency imposed by FFG.<br /><br />Getting every possible combination in N trials is impossible for all intents and purposes in lottery games.<br /><br />It is possible .....as they say but improbable. Such a probability is lower than the probability of the Earth reversing itself and spinning in the other direction. LOL<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/46071">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>WIN  D</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/46071</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

