<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>New FireFox 4 Beta 9.</title>
		<link>/blogentry/50746</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/blogcomments/50746" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>LANTERN's Blog: New FireFox 4 Beta 9.</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #2</title>
			<link>/blogentry/50746#c58935</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/50746#c58935</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 03:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>&#x3c;br /&#x3e;With Firefox we have always been able to copy and paste by using:&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;http://www.iuk.edu/~koctla/technology/Tip2.shtml&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Ctrl + C = Copy&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Ctrl + V = Paste&#x3c;br /&#x3e;&#x3c;br /&#x3e;-------&#x3c;br /&#x3e;But somehow now I can just HighLight Rth Click and Lth Click on Copy and then Paste on the regular way, for me &#x3c;br /&#x3e;somehow that old limitation of Firefox has been lifted.&#x3c;br /&#x3e;Now I can Copy and Paste any-way that I want with Firefox.... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/50746#c58935">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Comment #1</title>
			<link>/blogentry/50746#c58916</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/50746#c58916</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>GASMETERGUY</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I use FireFox also.  I have found that in some cases I can not cut and paste.  So I go to IE for that and return promptly to FireFox.  I get fewer viruses with Firefox.  If only they would fix the cut and paste function, I would be completely happy.</p>]]></description>
			<category>GASMETERGUY</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Original Blog Entry: New FireFox 4 Beta 9.</title>
			<link>/blogentry/50746</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">/blogentry/50746</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 05:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LANTERN</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I was just testing that new version of FireFox, it is on a Beta stage, it was freezing as I was trying to use it here at L.P.<br /><br />I don&#x27;t know what the problem is, but either it is not ready yet or L.P. is not ready for it yet.<br /><br />Either way, I just quit using it and deleted it, I was trying the portable version and I find that somehow it changed a little my 3.6.12 version of Firefox, it was not a good idea maybe to have both of them at the same time, even if I was only using 1 of them at a time.<br /><br />I must say that this older Firefox version is also portable, whenever I can I use portable software instead of the ones that have installers, but no matter what, they don&#x27;t seem to be completelly self contained on their own folder, some stuff seems to leak out of it elsewhere.<br /><br />They say that Google&#x27;s browser is the fastest now, but I have not tried it and I might not anyway as I like Firefox, at least so far I do.<br /><br />... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="/blogentry/50746">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blog Entry</category>
			<category>LANTERN</category>
			<wfw:comment>https://www.lotterypost.com/blogentry/50746</wfw:comment>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

