Once again we have to rely on foreign media...

Comment #6

rdgrnr — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 23:33:27 GMT

And they should be dealt with accordingly. They drew first blood. Unfortunately, we have a President with no backbone, who doesn't like to attend his daily security briefings or take heed of warnings about possible attacks on our embassies. He can read speeches off teleprompters real good though. In case that might help.<br

Comment #5

Todd — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 22:22:01 GMT

During this whole thing, Romney was the only one to make sense, and was the only one who responded like our president should. His press conference felt like he was already president, because he actually stood up for this country rather than try to apologize for it, and I look forward to January, 2013 when he can officially give such press conferences.

Comment #4

sully16 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:50:10 GMT

Good questions, hope we get real answers

Comment #3

Piaceri — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 17:14:07 GMT

Cajun - I read about that yesterday. Both are amazing facts coming out about our 'most transparent Administration in the history of the US'.

Comment #2

CajunWin4 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:39:05 GMT

Busted!â€¦ State Department Scrubs ing Memo From Website Following Deadly 9-11 Consulate Attacks Posted by Jim Hoft on Saturday, September 15, 2012, 3:46 PM On Wednesday September 12, 2012 blogger Speak With Authority discovered that five days before 9-11, the US State Department sent out a memo announcing no credible security threats against the United States on the anniversary of 9-11. The Overseas Security Advisor... [ More ]

Comment #1

JAP69 — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 16:09:52 GMT

If there is a congressional investigation to take place that will not likely happen right away. No questions until investigation is complete. Good luck on obtaining internal documents. Obviously no answers until after election.

Original Blog Entry: Once again we have to rely on foreign media...

Piaceri — Sun, 16 Sep 2012 15:48:40 GMT

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2202979/Benghazi-attack-U-S-consulate-pictured-Libyan-attack-revealed-officials-knew-attack-plans-48-HOURS-before.html#ixzz26RflCvYe

Because the US media is in the tank for Obama and would not dare tell the truth about what happened in Libya. This malpractice of the media would not have happened if Bush had been in office.

What the media should be asking is:

1. Was there, or was there not, warning ahead of time that there would be violence against U.S. Embassies?

2. Who was given the warning? What did he or she do with the information? How far up the chain did it go?

3. Was the Ambassador sodomized during the time he was supposedly being taken to the hospital?

4. Is ritual sodomization of defeated victims a tenet of Islamic victory practices?

5. Were the Embassy Guards given live ammunition with which to defend the Embassy?

6. If the guards were not given ammunition, who gave that order?

7. Who was responsible for securing classified information, like the Libyans Helping U.S. List?

8. Was there any heightened alert status at the Embassies in light of the date (9/11)? If not, why not?

9. How do you explain any discrepancy between the video posting date and the outbreak of outrage on 9/11?

But as Joe Scarborough says, the media was prevented from asking these questions because Romney chose to speak up. Seriously? How are we to believe that when reporters like CNN's Peter Hamby tweet the hyperlink to Obama's fundraising page from their official news accounts? How are we to believe that when Politico bloggers are allowed to use Politico blogs to repost Obama fundraising letters including hyperlinks to Obama's fundraising page? News for the newsmedia: the American people want answers, not continuous attacks on Romney by the supposedly nonpartisan 'news' reporters.

... [ More ]