<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>guru, lottosync-a personal opinion</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/101636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: guru, lottosync-a personal opinion</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/293290</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/293290</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2004 09:09:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Guru</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Rjoh:accuracy is measured be doing many trial runs of the software on past data.The better it performs in the past, the more likely it&#x27;s going to perform equally well in the future. Note that this way of testing accuracy does not apply well to any fixed number picking method. Suppose you picked your numbers on fuzzy rules likenumbers with certain skip rates or hot or cold numbers...etcChances are you may accidentally discover some  rule for picking numbers  in your lottery that may have led to m... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/293290">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Guru</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/292856</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/292856</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on November 30, 2004Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on November 30, 2004......I think you should try and improve accuracy, 3 from 6 40% of the time is plenty accurate enough for now...............just a personal opinion.    How are you measuring the accuracy of a prediction of a random dvent?RJOhRJOH, this is based on guru&#x27;s previous post about his success in the belgian 42 number lotto.paul.</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/292802</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/292802</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:51:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>RJOh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on November 30, 2004......I think you should try and improve accuracy, 3 from 6 40% of the time is plenty accurate enough for now...............just a personal opinion.    How are you measuring the accuracy of a prediction of a random dvent?RJOh</p>]]></description>
			<category>RJOh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/292732</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636/292732</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 13:54:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Guru</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>and a correct one.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Guru</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>guru, lottosync-a personal opinion</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2004 11:38:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I dont think you should bother with filters or wheels for V1.8 or other versions, I think you should try and improve accuracy, 3 from 6 40% of the time is plenty accurate enough for now without adding wheels and filters, if people want to use more numbers then thats upto them and there is plenty of free stuff out there to help, but I think its the accuracy of prediction that should be encouraged more, because it is the prediction accuracy aspect and not wheels or filters that is supposed to make... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/101636">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

