Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 9, 2016, 12:16 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

guru, lottosync-a personal opinion

Topic closed. 4 replies. Last post 12 years ago by Guru.

Page 1 of 1
PrintE-mailLink
paul762's avatar - lion

United Kingdom
Member #3002
December 11, 2003
477 Posts
Offline
Posted: November 30, 2004, 6:38 am - IP Logged

I dont think you should bother with filters or wheels for V1.8 or other versions, I think you should try and improve accuracy, 3 from 6 40% of the time is plenty accurate enough for now without adding wheels and filters, if people want to use more numbers then thats upto them and there is plenty of free stuff out there to help, but I think its the accuracy of prediction that should be encouraged more, because it is the prediction accuracy aspect and not wheels or filters that is supposed to make lottosync different from other software. just a personal opinion.

   


    Belgium
    Member #2220
    September 2, 2003
    553 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: November 30, 2004, 8:54 am - IP Logged

    and a correct one.

      RJOh's avatar - chipmunk
      mid-Ohio
      United States
      Member #9
      March 24, 2001
      19830 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: November 30, 2004, 10:51 am - IP Logged
      Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on November 30, 2004



      ......I think you should try and improve accuracy, 3 from 6 40% of the time is plenty accurate enough for now...............just a personal opinion.

         







      How are you measuring the accuracy of a prediction of a random dvent?

      RJOh

       * you don't need to buy more tickets, just buy a winning ticket * 
         
                   Evil Looking       

        paul762's avatar - lion

        United Kingdom
        Member #3002
        December 11, 2003
        477 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: November 30, 2004, 12:38 pm - IP Logged
        Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on November 30, 2004



        Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on November 30, 2004



        ......I think you should try and improve accuracy, 3 from 6 40% of the time is plenty accurate enough for now...............just a personal opinion.

           






        How are you measuring the accuracy of a prediction of a random dvent?

        RJOh





        RJOH, this is based on guru's previous post about his success in the belgian 42 number lotto.

        paul.


          Belgium
          Member #2220
          September 2, 2003
          553 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: December 1, 2004, 4:09 am - IP Logged

          Rjoh:

          accuracy is measured be doing many trial runs of the software on past data.

          The better it performs in the past, the more likely it's going to perform equally well in the future.

           

          Note that this way of testing accuracy does not apply well to any fixed number picking method. Suppose you picked your numbers on fuzzy rules like

          numbers with certain skip rates or hot or cold numbers...etc

          Chances are you may accidentally discover some "rule for picking numbers" in your lottery that may have led to multiple 4 or 5 hits in the recent past. But you'll have no reason to believe this "rule" will lead to wins in the future.