computerized drawings...a finding

Reply #40

Justin — Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:09:55 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Justin on December 7, 2004im looking for a possible 076 box to fall in the CA eve draw this week12/8 brings 0262=7

Reply #39

Justin — Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:07:55 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by CASH Only on December 7, 2004Remember when 9s were not programmed into the AZ computers?What game. the pick 3? wow..........what happened. how the $#$# did AZ give back to everyone who lost

Reply #38

Konformthismfs — Thu, 09 Dec 2004 08:38:53 GMT

Hey Cash i remember that! It was a few years back. Can you imagine all the players in AZ chasing that number that wasn't even in the program?And Pegleg your right NY isn't computerized, my mistake!KonformthisMFS

Reply #37

Justin — Wed, 08 Dec 2004 07:30:09 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Justin on December 6, 2004Quote: Originally posted by Justin on December 6, 2004Proof on CA this is how i winwatch how the pairs that hit twice almost always hit a third time right away, look at the hits with ONLY a 10 day span (wins in red)eveSun, Dec 5, 20042-4-3Sat, Dec 4, 20047-3-6Fri, Dec 3, 20042-4-4Thu, Dec 2, 20040-0-9Wed, Dec 1, 20046-6-6Tue, Nov 30, 20043-1-9Mon, Nov 29, 20044-7-6Sun, Nov 28, 20041-7-3Sat, Nov 27, 20046-5-6Fri, Nov 26, 20041-3-8my guess is 7... [ More ]

Reply #36

Saleo Paleo — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:54:59 GMT

Cal pulled a fast one on today's mdday 333,but the dble 3's were there,181,818,788,877,988,899,look good for the future. .

Reply #35

CASH Only — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:53:02 GMT

Remember when 9s were not programmed into the AZ computers

Reply #34

four4me — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:34:16 GMT

12/06/2004 4 2 7 eve12/06/2004 8 8 0 mid12/05/2004 2 4 3 eve12/05/2004 7 4 2 mid12/04/2004 7 0 6 mid12/04/2004 7 3 6 eve12/03/2004 4 7 0 mid12/03/2004 2 4 4 eve no 1's 5's or 9,s time to add one of these to Cal. next draws

Reply #33

Justin — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:16:14 GMT

im looking for a possible 076 box to fall in the CA eve draw this week

Reply #32

LOTTOMIKE — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:13:35 GMT

thanks guys for the proof.......

Reply #31

Saleo Paleo — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:52:11 GMT

Ca. 12-6-04 ev stx12-4 e 736 12-6 e 42712-5 m 742 extra proof it can be won.12-5 e 24312-6 m 880

Reply #30

Justin — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 06:35:40 GMT

427 hit in ca again todayWOW MORE PROOF

Reply #29

Justin — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 06:31:17 GMT

Reply #28

Saleo Paleo — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:19:27 GMT

Justin you had it down also 790 in your stx.

Reply #27

Saleo Paleo — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 21:17:06 GMT

4 four me that works very good I use it quite often myself.

Reply #26

Saleo Paleo — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:59:50 GMT

Indiana stx today, mday p3 was 79012-3e 79412-4m 978 (0,3,5,6 out)12-4 e 41212-5 e 148Easy to pick from the Dominate #'s in the stx 97, 44, 88,11 the 41 and 97 was the most prevaling #'s , I would play them like this 482,414,404,419,790,792,793,974,975,976, $.25 per #, $2.50 I would have played if I was playing in Indiania's p3.

Reply #25

four4me — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:16:37 GMT

Try compairing computerized states with balls states side by side. You'll see very similar number patterns.Also when working with the history charts combine midday with evening draws in your stack. 2 or 3 numbers might pop up from draw to draw. about 2 times a week. Almost every state carries a pair from one draw to another. Several times a week. Work with the hot numbers and add a cold number to your selections. Or longest number out.Luke warm numbers or numbers that fall in between hot and col... [ More ]

Reply #24

Saleo Paleo — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:58:14 GMT

Justins method is very good it works like my stacking system,and I get many wins from it,wheather it is computerized or not, But I still think the computerized system is rigged and I do not play very many #'s from a state with that system.

Reply #23

Justin — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:53:31 GMT

yup

Reply #22

LOTTOMIKE — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 09:20:30 GMT

thanks......california is computerized right

Reply #21

Justin — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 09:16:01 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Justin on December 6, 2004Proof on CA this is how i winwatch how the pairs that hit twice almost always hit a third time right away, look at the hits with ONLY a 10 day span (wins in red)eveSun, Dec 5, 20042-4-3Sat, Dec 4, 20047-3-6Fri, Dec 3, 20042-4-4Thu, Dec 2, 20040-0-9Wed, Dec 1, 20046-6-6Tue, Nov 30, 20043-1-9Mon, Nov 29, 20044-7-6Sun, Nov 28, 20041-7-3Sat, Nov 27, 20046-5-6Fri, Nov 26, 20041-3-8my guess is 76 or 73 hit in the last 7 days or will in the next cou... [ More ]

Reply #20

Justin — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 09:08:04 GMT

Proof on CA this is how i winwatch how the pairs that hit twice almost always hit a third time right away, look at the hits with ONLY a 10 day span (wins in red)eveSun, Dec 5, 20042-4-3Sat, Dec 4, 20047-3-6Fri, Dec 3, 20042-4-4Thu, Dec 2, 20040-0-9Wed, Dec 1, 20046-6-6Tue, Nov 30, 20043-1-9Mon, Nov 29, 20044-7-6Sun, Nov 28, 20041-7-3Sat, Nov 27, 20046-5-6Fri, Nov 26, 20041-3-8my guess is 76 or 73 hit in the last 7 days or will in the next couple in eve drawmiddayCalifornia Midday 3 Previous Lott... [ More ]

Reply #19

LOTTOMIKE — Sun, 05 Dec 2004 22:32:29 GMT

so what your saying is with ball drawings all these numbers seem to come in at certain times but if they switched to computers the numbers would not come in at certain times or not at all when compared with ball drawings

Reply #18

Justin — Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:08:26 GMT

What is truly amazing is if any of you have P3/4 lotto you can look at your states stats over like 10 yearsI looked at mine, and all the percents were almost DEAD ON, on an average of ten years, triples averaged almost exactly waht they were supposed to, so did doubles, evens, odds, highs, lowsI think this is what they want computers for, no matter how hard they try, ball drawings to seem to involve math

Reply #17

pegleg — Sun, 05 Dec 2004 21:04:38 GMT

KonformthisMFS: With the possible exception of Quick Draw, New York games are not computerized,(YET)pegleg

Reply #16

thrashingkorn — Sun, 05 Dec 2004 10:55:14 GMT

really!i think computerized drawings will cause more people to win.besides, isnt this what we are alll here for? how exactly does one believe there may be mischief lurking behind the computer drawings?this i fail to recognize as a whole. you guys are paranoid. excuse me if im being disrespectful.

Reply #15

JAP69 — Sun, 05 Dec 2004 02:03:51 GMT

I track certain groups of numbers in all states and my selections hit in rng drawings as well as ball drawings.When they hit it is just a matter of I do not know where.

Reply #14

Badger — Sun, 05 Dec 2004 01:42:30 GMT

Especially to Lottomike -You originally mentioned how the RNG games are repeating combos...In Wi (which went to RNG on 11/3/04) tonight 594 dropped. That means we have had the 45 pair hitting the last 3 drawings in a row.Could it be, as Justin mentioned earlier, that we now need to chase hot numbers in computerized states? In the past, it appeared that with machines, if you broke the digits down into Hot, Warm and Cold, seldom would you want to combine 3 Hot digits in a combination; as the dra... [ More ]

Reply #13

JAZZY JASPER — Sat, 04 Dec 2004 08:43:09 GMT

Reply #12

Justin — Sat, 04 Dec 2004 08:31:40 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Konformthismfs on December 4, 2004Computerized drawings are here to stay and spreading like a virus! My opinion is they have only one purpose and that's to increase the Lotteries bottom line (and Gtech's). They could care less about who wins, loses or someone's system. It's set up to play the numbers with the least payout and maximum profit. So the days of bettin $20 on 1 line and winning are pretty much over with. Unless you play online were the numbers you play are... [ More ]

Reply #11

Konformthismfs — Sat, 04 Dec 2004 07:12:15 GMT

Computerized drawings are here to stay and spreading like a virus! My opinion is they have only one purpose and that's to increase the Lotteries bottom line (and Gtech's). They could care less about who wins, loses or someone's system. It's set up to play the numbers with the least payout and maximum profit. So the days of bettin $20 on 1 line and winning are pretty much over with. Unless you play online were the numbers you play are never entered into the computer. When it comes to patterns, if... [ More ]

Reply #10

Jumikee — Sat, 04 Dec 2004 04:39:08 GMT

Yes I agree 100% Maverick! The players are the ones spending the money. This is OUR game! Why does the lottery think it has the right to switch to computerized drawings without even polling the public? The lottery does not even have the courtesy of asking their players what they want. They should have people vote on this. We have to do more than sign the petition. We should contact the higher ups (Governors,Congressmen,Senate,etc) I suppose most of these idiots will think they have more

Reply #9

Maverick — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 22:15:05 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Jumikee on December 3, 2004But I still believe the officials are switching to Computerized drawings to make sure nobody can win TOO often. BINGO! They advertise that this is a game . They should let the PEOPLE make the choice between computerized/balls.

Reply #8

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 19:09:49 GMT

i agree...

Reply #7

Badger — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:15:41 GMT

Lottomike,If the RNG states are producing a biased output, then maybe there is a yet-to-be-discovered method/methods for those? The idea would be to take a game that produces the same combos and digits repeatedly and consider that as a possible pattern. It is, in fact, a pattern of sorts.How knows...but wouldn't it be fun to thwart the states that have gone to RNG...sort of like hoisting them on their own pitards

Reply #6

Jumikee — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 13:02:16 GMT

On the other hand it may be easier for some systems to hit. Some systems that rely on a certain factor to come into play in order for the system to hit. Like when all odd or all even digit combos are due. They usually hit a certain amount of times a month. But sometimes the unexpected happens and they can go a month or more without hitting. If we could eliminate these surprises it would make it more easy to hit. Maybe computers will make it easier to hit because it makes the draws more ran... [ More ]

Reply #5

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 12:23:21 GMT

yep its kinda like when all the states are computerized we will look back on the days when there were ball drawings and say........remember the good 'ol days when we won sometimes.....

Reply #4

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 12:20:36 GMT

all of what you just said is exactly what i'm thinking too,you said that perfectly...they want to go computerized because they know that unlike the ball drawing its hard to detect patterns and the numbers are erratic from one drawing to the next and you might as well throw a system out the window with computerized drawings. with ball drawings you can have a system and detect patterns and make some hits.......

Reply #3

Jumikee — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 12:07:09 GMT

This is Exactly what I was afraid of too! I think this is the MAIN reason that the lottery wants to change to using Computerized drawings. They are not stupid. They know that lots of people win ONLY because of the systems they use. They will never admit this in public, they want people to believe that systems dont really work (and 95% probably do not work very good) And if they make the drawings really erradic, they will screw up people's systems and make them lose money. I use to thin... [ More ]

Reply #2

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:34:16 GMT

i like quick picks but i also like playing my own numbers and i'll play the same ones until they hit,we've had a pick 5 game in tennessee here only a couple months and sticking with the same numbers i've hit four outta five a few times and also played a pick three number every day ten times a day till i hit....have patience and it'll happen

Reply #1

ayenowitall — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 09:38:29 GMT

Fight fire with fire. Play Quick Picks.Good luck,aye

computerized drawings...a finding

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 03 Dec 2004 03:26:14 GMT

i went to several states websites tonight that had computerized drawings and then went to the states who do ball drawings....what i found shocked me.....i noticed that ball drawings had more variety of numbers hitting as each day passed and you could detect a pattern of sorts .with computers there was no detectable pattern and in one computerized state i saw where 004 hit three out of nine days then 008 hit then 992,in like ten days the number 5,6,8,4 or 3 never even hit anywhere in the pick thr... [ More ]