Quantum Physics

Reply #38

NewClub — Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:31:54 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by stoopendaal on February 13, 2005Hi Sedertree,You might find this link interesting :http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=126649Thanks Sedertree for starting this link and thank stoopendaal for this info.

Reply #37

RJOh — Sun, 13 Mar 2005 00:58:52 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Rip Snorter on March 12, 2005I wouldn't be reading, posting, studying the numbers if I din't believe that's true. Probably, you, also. I just happen to harbor more doubts that it can be done than you probably do. I'm not all that righteous.JackI think those of us who study the numbers, see patterns and pick our own numbers are trying to accomplished in 10-50 lines what is accomplished in thousands of lines with quickpicks and that is impossible. I've noticed in th... [ More ]

Reply #36

Rip Snorter — Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:53:53 GMT

Maybe we aren't righteous enough in this righteous universe to pick the righteous lottery numbers. We are going to have to study the numbers more righteously.RJOhI wouldn't be reading, posting, studying the numbers if I din't believe that's true. Probably, you, also. I just happen to harbor more doubts that it can be done than you probably do. I'm not all that righteous.Jack

Reply #35

RJOh — Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:56:36 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Rip Snorter on March 12, 2005I don't discount the obvious fact that a lot more QPs are sold, but those of us who study those numbers and see the patterns ought to be winning better than we do in a more righteous universe.JackMaybe we aren't righteous enough in this righteous universe to pick the righteous lottery numbers. We are going to have to study the numbers more righteously.RJOh

Reply #34

Rip Snorter — Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:15:19 GMT

We need some quantum physics implemented in the predictions software. In addition we probably need PC hardware(working together with the prediction software) which is able to peek into the future. The only problem I can see with that is that the balls in lottery drawings appear to perform somewhat to electrons described in a theorem known as Bell's Inequality. Einstein's fixed universe, full of rules and patterns everything has to obey at every level from sub-atomic upward, was conclusively di... [ More ]

Reply #33

Sedertree — Tue, 08 Mar 2005 02:38:18 GMT

Thanks SirMetro,I know this is it this time. I will never smoke again.BTW, I gave my brother Matthew a ride to see his son yesterday. OMG, I about gagged at the smell of cigarette smoke on him when he got in.I actually had to crack the window, sunroof and turn on the vent.That was probably me not too long ago.

Reply #32

SirMetro — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:15:30 GMT

Sedertree....Congrats on the smokefree.Am smokefree here for 4 years now. Wished the program my wife sells was available back when I quit smoking. Take a shot and smoke no more. She says they have an average of 83% success rate (even higher when the females are removed from the count). And if it's any consolation, since it's been 2 weeks, your body is free of the nicotine. Now all you have to do is stop the emotional reaching into your shirt pocket behavior. Believe me, even after 4 years, I t... [ More ]

Reply #31

Sedertree — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:35:40 GMT

Thanks Hyper,Still smoke free... I came close to giving in a couple of times.This has been cold-turkey all the way.Today is two weeks without a cigarette. Cravings have just about subsided.

Reply #30

hypersoniq — Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:21:58 GMT

Congrats on that Sedertree

Reply #29

Sedertree — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:44:15 GMT

On Saturday, 02/19/2005;Me, Myself and I; ad infitem quit smoking for good.We are mostly happy with our decision to quit. Some of us have to be reminded, from time to time, that this was a joint decision.

Reply #28

ineed9million — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:18:42 GMT

sedertreenice avatar.

Reply #27

stoopendaal — Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:09:00 GMT

Hi Sedertree,You might find this link interesting :http://www.rednova.com/news/display/?id=126649

Reply #26

Sedertree — Wed, 09 Feb 2005 16:55:50 GMT

I wonder when quantum computers come of age, if that would be possible. Haven't done any research into this area though. Just heard they were on the horizon.I wonder how much the 64bit processors/systems are going for

Reply #25

MillionsWanted — Mon, 07 Feb 2005 00:17:44 GMT

I've said it somewhere else and I'll say it again. We need some quantum physics implemented in the predictions software. In addition we probably need PC hardware(working together with the prediction software) which is able to peek into the future.

Reply #24

LuckyFoxTerrier — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 15:04:56 GMT

Some of you, based on this thread of conversation, might be interested in reading The Nature of Personal Reality by Jane Roberts, and also some of her other books, which are known as Seth books. Seth was a channeled entity who spoke about how we create our own realities. --through our thoughts and beliefs, and not through dumb luck. Is he right? I don't know. When I see what sure looks like random numbers and winners in the lottery, I doubt it. Yet at other times, it sure SEEMS like... [ More ]

Reply #23

Rick G — Thu, 06 Jan 2005 18:38:00 GMT

I agree with Phokas in the sense that if I'm playing a lottery game with 135 million combinations, a quick pick (or any random number) is the way to go. Not because it is a better way of picking numbers but because there are too many variables to consider to make a logical decision and randomness is too tough to beat in these circumstances. However, if I'm playing the pick 3 game with only 1000 possible outcomes, you can bet I'm playing MY numbers, not theirs. 135,000 times easier to win.... [ More ]

Reply #22

hypersoniq — Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:50:05 GMT

Sedertree, I believe there are streaming video recorders available on the net if you look hard enough for them

Reply #21

RJOh — Sun, 02 Jan 2005 01:15:38 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Phokas on January 1, 2005If there were people who won big or consecutively then of course other people would be asking if they had a system that helped them pick the correct numbers. And I seriously doubt people would share with others their so-called methods that they thought gave them an edge - if they ever had such a thing; which is very doubtful. You assume a player with a winning system would win big often, I don't. For a pick three or a pick four game, it migh... [ More ]

Reply #20

hypersoniq — Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:23:00 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Sedertree on December 31, 2004Hyper,I don't know if you've seen the special;3 Part Series SpecialI had to install realplayer to watch it... well worth it. I've got to get this on DVD.Thanks! I'll check it out.

Reply #19

Phokas — Sat, 01 Jan 2005 12:39:07 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on December 31, 2004If you won a big jackpot and really believed that you knew something that gave you an edge, would you share it with the whole world before you had a chance to try and win big again?RJOhAs for me, no, I couldn't share a winning strategy with others only because I personally don't believe that one exists. I always play quick picks.If there were people who won big or consecutively then of course other people would be asking if they had a system t... [ More ]

Reply #18

Badger — Sat, 01 Jan 2005 04:08:34 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Sedertree on December 31, 2004The problem with human free will is The Will of God Omnipotent and OmniscientIn theology you are pawns in Gods Plan so how can you have free will at all. It is impossible to have your cake and eat it too.As we speak, particle accelerators like FermiLab and CERN are/will be on the hunt for Gravitons and Sparticles. Discovering these will prove that the equations of quantum mechanics, including parallel universes, are correct without a s... [ More ]

Reply #17

Teufellj — Sat, 01 Jan 2005 02:08:19 GMT

Hello Sedertree,From the speculations that I have read lately, I take it that few if any have heard that time is a river---suppose that there are three log side by side in this river---also suppose that these logs are titled Past, Present and Future ---It would be a good speculation that an entity could bridge any one of the titled logs and note what did happen; what will happen; the Log titled Present is the go between because so to say, it's half- Past and half- Future. I would seriously... [ More ]

Reply #16

RJOh — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:30:56 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Phokas on December 31, 2004It's interesting how people who win frequently or win really big never give any impression that they read tea leaves, use quantum equations or have the help and wisdom of gods and spirits to figure out their numbers to play. If you won a big jackpot and really believed that you knew something that gave you an edge, would you share it with the whole world before you had a chance to try and win big again?RJOh

Reply #15

Phokas — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 21:11:43 GMT

It's interesting how people who win frequently or win really big never give any impression that they read tea leaves, use quantum equations or have the help and wisdom of gods and spirits to figure out their numbers to play. All winning cases I hear about are either the quick pick variety or the odd person who always played the same numbers (usually sentimental numbers like birthdays) for decades and finally had luck with them. Even the profiles of most winners, like Whittaker and the recent cas... [ More ]

Reply #14

Hyperdimension — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 20:24:06 GMT

Hi, Sedertree, thank you for the link to the Elegant Universe and the M theory, I have 2 interesting books related to the parallel universe phenomena, the 10th dimension and the elegant universe, but I haven't finish to read them yet.. How many doubles do we have

Reply #13

Rick G — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:27:53 GMT

Quote from Sedertree's original post: Every time that I have won the lottery. Or at least one of those should have, could have, would have experiences. I had a pre-sense that it was the right thing to do at the moment. Of course those feelings don't always come to me. Perhaps the circumstances were not right for the possiblility of success.The closest I can come to describe the feeling. Is a brain-numbing thumping sensation inside my head accompanied by an elated sense of physical well-being. Li... [ More ]

Reply #12

Sedertree — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 17:07:28 GMT

The problem with human free will is The Will of God Omnipotent and OmniscientIn theology you are pawns in Gods Plan so how can you have free will at all. It is impossible to have your cake and eat it too.As we speak, particle accelerators like FermiLab and CERN are/will be on the hunt for Gravitons and Sparticles. Discovering these will prove that the equations of quantum mechanics, including parallel universes, are correct without a shadow of a doubt. Then we will be Omniscient.

Reply #11

straightchaser — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:17:54 GMT

Interesting stuff Sedertree... I've often wondered about this.....A nice piece of information on the existence of other dimensions is the the NOVA piece on knot theory and how it may very well offer a theoretical explanation of the existence of other dimensions in time and space.But, I'm sort of bothered by the idea that there are additional copies of me in these other dimensions. I guess it's a religious thing....Predestination maybe, free will can alter this predestination I think.....but H... [ More ]

Reply #10

Badger — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 12:10:03 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Sedertree on December 29, 2004Hi Friends,I'm in the middle of Brian Greene's latest book; The Fabric of the Cosmos Of particular interest is the fact that past, present and future exist simultaniously. This according to Einsteins equations of the nature of spacetime.Thus being, your life and the decisions that you, or anyone else, make along the way are predetermined. There is nothing you can do to change the future. Seems that fate and destiny are a consequence of r... [ More ]

Reply #9

Sedertree — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 11:12:56 GMT

Hyper,I don't know if you've seen the special;3 Part Series SpecialI had to install realplayer to watch it... well worth it. I've got to get this on DVD.

Reply #8

Fenix — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:54:20 GMT

Hmm...some serious talks about parallel universes and even lottery winning in them...and haven't seen someone provided a tiniest proof about those universes existence so far.BTW in this universe for a guaranteed 3/6 out of 49 is still something like 163 lines

Reply #7

Sedertree — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 08:31:21 GMT

JKing,Try this neat link;Quantum MechanicsThe Elegant Universe was Brian Greene's first book.

Reply #6

Hyperdimension — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 04:30:51 GMT

Very interesting your theory Sedertree, Well, I'll continue buying lotto tickets to make happy millions of doubles in other parallel universes, maybe later I'll have my turn to win in this universe.. Regards

Reply #5

Sedertree — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 03:25:02 GMT

Hyper,Once I'm finished with the book. Maybe I can come up with a useful equation for JKing. Einstein distanced himself from Quantum Mechanics, to bad, so sad..... Just read that his cosmological constant was dventually exonerated despite giving up on it when red shift was discovered.He wanted so bad to believe in a static universe. I'll attribute that to his deep-seated religious beliefs. So Copernican.Anyway....Back to the question of parallel universes. How many are there? More importantly, h... [ More ]

Reply #4

hypersoniq — Fri, 31 Dec 2004 01:27:24 GMT

If all else is equal...Raher than trying to predict... what about trying to Remember the next draw

Reply #3

JKING — Thu, 30 Dec 2004 13:16:44 GMT

Are there any useful equations to support the theory

Reply #2

Sedertree — Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:44:51 GMT

Good point and correct as well....

Reply #1

Hyperdimension — Wed, 29 Dec 2004 21:40:51 GMT

Hi, Sedertree, if you add to your theory the parallel universe theory..Then If I play lotto and If I don't win (in this universe), I don't care because in other universe my double actually won the lottery with the same number I played here...Regards

Quantum Physics

Sedertree — Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:05:48 GMT

Hi Friends,I'm in the middle of Brian Greene's latest book; The Fabric of the Cosmos Of particular interest is the fact that past, present and future exist simultaniously. This according to Einsteins equations of the nature of spacetime.Thus being, your life and the decisions that you, or anyone else, make along the way are predetermined. There is nothing you can do to change the future. Seems that fate and destiny are a consequence of reality.It is further stated that at some level you already... [ More ]