Texas 1/31 Evening...45?

Reply #28

undress — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:50:08 GMT

I hate when that happens

Reply #27

Texasman — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:46:16 GMT

6-2-8 came: Well, the original view I had that a 2 was key was right. Just missed by one on that 246 I suggested. Those other numbers were me second-guessing myself, and they were worse.

Reply #26

viperfour — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 13:51:00 GMT

Hi Fletch,I played 729! You were closer then I was though. :-)Dave

Reply #25

Fletch — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 09:42:58 GMT

I played 728 tonight, and so did txpolo. We were both OFF BY ONE NUMBER TONIGHT! 628 came up. Almost! I think I'm gonna cry

Reply #24

casper — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 06:50:22 GMT

Wow, that 728 was one number off. My 6 came out in the first position though.I had a quick pick that was 827.

Reply #23

timetowin — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:47:16 GMT

one more 456,829

Reply #22

timetowin — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:42:52 GMT

589

Reply #21

Texasman — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 03:28:59 GMT

Wow, the 278 is in a column in my workout that says at least one of those digits will come, but not all three. That's OK, once 568 came in and all three of those were in another column. It's rare, but does happen sometimes.....careful, guys....

Reply #20

MADDOG10 — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 02:05:38 GMT

i'm thinking the 756 is looking better...

Reply #19

txpolo — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:39:35 GMT

Thanks Fletch, will do that.

Reply #18

Fletch — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:14:35 GMT

Txpolo, U might wanna play that 728 boxed, just to be on the safe side. I'm thinking on playing that number, as well.

Reply #17

txpolo — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 01:05:42 GMT

I'am going with 728 tonight.

Reply #16

Badger — Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:57:34 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Texasman on January 31, 2005To Badger,Yes, it's a problem of timing concerning when to play the pair from a previous double. I don't start playing the next day until they come in, because I would be broke by now. Sometimes they DO come the very next day or two or three. It's just a consistent framework on which to attach another method in order to narrow down the window of opportunity . It's a pattern I wondered about when I decided to use the double numbers to fi... [ More ]

Reply #15

Texasman — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:44:00 GMT

To Badger,Yes, it's a problem of timing concerning when to play the pair from a previous double. I don't start playing the next day until they come in, because I would be broke by now. Sometimes they DO come the very next day or two or three. It's just a consistent framework on which to attach another method in order to narrow down the window of opportunity . It's a pattern I wondered about when I decided to use the double numbers to find a unique-single digit combination. Instead of trying... [ More ]

Reply #14

viperfour — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:40:20 GMT

make a new post

Reply #13

undress — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:34:21 GMT

Thanks

Reply #12

Texasman — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:33:38 GMT

Well, 345 box hit at Midday Monday. That kind of diminishes my 245 for tonight. I did some revamping and adjusting on part of my workout and got some other numbers for Monday night 1/31/05.Looks like 7 is the strongest with 0,1, 3, 4. So, It's good to play 017, 037, 047, 137, 147, 347 and (007, just because), along with 245 and 246.The reasoning for the 7 is because it's in a column that shows me the 2, 7 and 8. History tells me that when three or more number are in this particular column t... [ More ]

Reply #11

casper — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:01:58 GMT

Also the 6 in the middle position hasn't been out in around 37 days.

Reply #10

undress — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:18:35 GMT

Thank You

Reply #9

casper — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 15:14:00 GMT

What about looking at this? The last three times 396 came out, a double followed it.I'm wondering if a double might be on tonights draw. what do you think

Reply #8

Justin — Mon, 31 Jan 2005 00:04:59 GMT

you could double your wagers after 15 draws. but i dont use any method that takes consistently more than 8-12 draws.

Reply #7

Badger — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:54:26 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Texasman on January 30, 2005Could be! Coincidentally, I ran into a friend last night I had not seen in about 2 years. He always has to play 5-2-4 in that order because of some family member's birthday. Well' that's a waste of time and money and hogwash. Yeah, he finally won on the Midday 425, but at what cost? So, my point is that it really may be due in the evening based on my workout method, especially after coincidentally running into my friend. I don't care... [ More ]

Reply #6

Texasman — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:38:56 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Justin on January 30, 2005Quote: Originally posted by Texasman on January 30, 2005Could be! Coincidentally, I ran into a friend last night I had not seen in about 2 years. He always has to play 5-2-4 in that order because of some family member's birthday. Well' that's a waste of time and money and hogwash. Yeah, he finally won on the Midday 425, but at what cost? So, my point is that it really may be due in the evening based on my workout method, especially afte... [ More ]

Reply #5

Justin — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:33:32 GMT

Reply #4

Texasman — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:26:59 GMT

Justin and Fletch,Thanks for those observations. It's something that didn't occur to me, but well worth noting for sure. Strange stuff, huh

Reply #3

Texasman — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:22:42 GMT

Could be! Coincidentally, I ran into a friend last night I had not seen in about 2 years. He always has to play 5-2-4 in that order because of some family member's birthday. Well' that's a waste of time and money and hogwash. Yeah, he finally won on the Midday 425, but at what cost? So, my point is that it really may be due in the evening based on my workout method, especially after coincidentally running into my friend. I don't care for that number personally...that doesn't matter. The Pi... [ More ]

Reply #2

Justin — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:22:34 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Fletch on January 30, 2005245 may very well not work for tomorrow because I looked up the draw history that contained those exact numbers and 524 was drawn on 1/31/04 -- a year ago tomorrow. And I'm not sure that a Pick-3 set with the same numbers, boxed or otherwise, had ever recurred a year or so to the very month and day of the last drawing. I haven't looked at 457 yet, but maybe that number has a better chance.actually if you would backtest that, that kind of thin... [ More ]

Reply #1

Fletch — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:13:49 GMT

245 may very well not work for tomorrow because I looked up the draw history that contained those exact numbers and 524 was drawn on 1/31/04 -- a year ago tomorrow. And I'm not sure that a Pick-3 set with the same numbers, boxed or otherwise, had ever recurred a year or so to the very month and day of the last drawing. I haven't looked at 457 yet, but maybe that number has a better chance.

Texas 1/31 Evening...45?

Texasman — Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:38:28 GMT

245 or 246 are best. That's all I can live with tonight.Note: 396 hit Saturday night. Remember when a double is drawn, sometime within the next 21 draws its pair comes again - sometimes the very next night. 633 had come right after 455. And 393 had come in the night before 396. 396 took care of the 633 AND the 393 in one fell swoop.Now, 4-5 is pushing it and has got to show, based on consistent statistics. 245 really looks good because of that fact and because 727 came the other night, and u... [ More ]