<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Those That Use Lotto Cheatah Version 2</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107318</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/107318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Those That Use Lotto Cheatah Version 2</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Those That Use Lotto Cheatah Version 2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107318</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107318</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 23:43:29 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ahalogod7</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey everyone, for those of you that use Lotto Cheatah Version 2 should read the following paragraphs below.    On some draws it did worse, but on more it did far better.I didn&#x27;t get to test the picker engine as much as I wanted to. I had a majordeployment problem with v2. Resolved now, but it took 5 days to figure itout.I got some 5&#x27;s on pick 6 and 7 and lots of 4&#x27;s on the pick 5&#x27;s the 3 days Itested it. Overall many more 3 or better for v2, but more skunks andnear-skunks too. When your hot, you... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107318">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Ahalogod7</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

