Even a better lottosync 1.8 ??

Reply #48

paul762 — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:23:54 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by spock on March 1, 2005 The fact that Guru has to work so hard with his business should tell us how successful his lotto pro-gramme is? 1.6 and 1.7 are waste of time i only hope 1.8. lives up to the hype..I think you hit the nail right on the head.

Reply #47

reddog — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:19:32 GMT

You have to remember, Guru said 1.8 would be a gift to us waiting on our decent upgrade.

Reply #46

reddog — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:12:23 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by vick on March 1, 2005Ya, so March 2005 has arrived and we've come full circle with 1 year since the last 1.7 version was released. Hopefully Guru can get 1.8 out sometime this month.YOU THINK

Reply #45

spock — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:00:30 GMT

The fact that Guru has to work so hard with his business should tell us how successful his lotto pro-gramme is? 1.6 and 1.7 are waste of time i only hope 1.8. lives up to the hype..

Reply #44

vick — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:50:12 GMT

Ya, so March 2005 has arrived and we've come full circle with 1 year since the last 1.7 version was released. Hopefully Guru can get 1.8 out sometime this month.

Reply #43

Slok88 — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:16:17 GMT

While we are waiting, my LS1.7 hit 3 numbers tonight Guru: From past posts, you said the prediction engine for LS 1.8 is ready, could you not release that first then further improve the software ?.Oh I believe there is a animation exhibition in Belgium, probably why Guru hasn't replied.

Reply #42

paul762 — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:26:13 GMT

Looks like more waiting time then

Reply #41

paul762 — Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:43:38 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 17, 2005Hi all,After a long wait, I finally found some hours to further develop lottosync 1.8While analysing some test results, I stumbled upon something new that might make lottosync even better. If my feelings are correct about this, it may even bring us to a point of accuracy that is scary.I would like to stress the words might and may because it isn't tested in the actual engine yet. It's only in my head at the moment, but I have a feeling this... [ More ]

Reply #40

reddog — Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:46:33 GMT

Reply #39

paul762 — Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:22:53 GMT

sorry ! a little childish ? well maybe, but im sick of people sticking their nose in when they havent even purchased the software and dont understand the situation. sprouting on about how we are whining on, it is over a year we have been waiting for something useful you know

Reply #38

BobP — Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:37:00 GMT

Was there ever a time when the hot numbers won? With any lottery software you delete a year's worth of draw history and play the software against the draw history to see what would have happened if you'd bought it a year ago. Doing this I've found the rare occasional win and more often watched as the software walked around the winning numbers it was approaching predicting as if the programmer was on to something that faded away as he got close.Sometime I try and make the software predict a past... [ More ]

Reply #37

LANTERN — Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:06:52 GMT

Guru, Todd and everybody.As time goes by, things are bound to DEGENERATE into worse than these, maybe?I am surprised that they haven't yet.Solution

Reply #36

paul762 — Wed, 23 Feb 2005 14:59:47 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by fbird on February 22, 2005Well,Gonna tell you a story..and it ain't about a man name Jed..lol. I can laugh, it was my money. Ok, ok to the point. One day, about 7 years ago, I played a number 18 times str. ..3 digit and won a good chunk of change. So I thought I would buy some systems from some of the so called experts. After some reading about different experts , I settled on Steve Players system. I will not go into the money I spent, but it was a decent amount...... [ More ]

Reply #35

MillionsWanted — Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:01:48 GMT

I hope it will do well when the next version is comes out.If version 1.8 is capable of showing consistently good results you might have a future customer.

Reply #34

Guru — Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:58:32 GMT

The problem with lottery systems is that although mathematics are involved, it is not an exact science.If you buy a calculator, then you expect the calculator to produce the correct outcome always... That's exact science...One day we may all get cancer, we may be able to afford the best and most expensive possible treatment to cure the cancer, but unfortunately the result of the cure is uncertain. Some people will die, while others heal.However, this does not mean that cancer treatment does not... [ More ]

Reply #33

fbird — Wed, 23 Feb 2005 02:31:24 GMT

Well,Gonna tell you a story..and it ain't about a man name Jed..lol. I can laugh, it was my money. Ok, ok to the point. One day, about 7 years ago, I played a number 18 times str. ..3 digit and won a good chunk of change. So I thought I would buy some systems from some of the so called experts. After some reading about different experts , I settled on Steve Players system. I will not go into the money I spent, but it was a decent amount...a lot more than you people are WHINING about. One of t... [ More ]

Reply #32

paul762 — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:54:34 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 21, 2005Now let me set something straight here:Not a single customer bought Version 1.8 and did not get it !! because we still only sell version 1.6 together with 1.7 !!!!!1.8 Will be a FREE UPGRADE when it is ready !!!. (If I was after the money, I Would make you pay for the upgrades !!!)GOOD POINT !If someone feels uncomfortable with the price tag of the software, then you simply should not buy it !! (You don't buy a Ferrari too if you can't afford... [ More ]

Reply #31

vick — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:58:49 GMT

I've won money with all the programs i've bought, lotto pro, Gail howard, and lottosynch. Lotto pro is pretty good at pick 3 and sometimes keno, Gail Howard is the BEST at stats for any lotto including keno, the BEST., and lottosynch has an uncanny knack for sometimes picking an unusally HIGH amount of winners in a SMALL set, that's the key lots of winners in a small set!Let's just let Guru finish the current version he's working on because basically we don't have any choice and i'd prefer a bet... [ More ]

Reply #30

psykomo — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:20:47 GMT

THANK yo reddog:FOR your question, but I don t DRAANK like yousu.........mus.......tttttttttttttt???////////??.......DOOOOO.....DO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!A..........DOOO............................(sorry, just .....asume you contribute ....SOOMUCH.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!assummmmmingggggggggggg!!!!!)NO........INVITE ........IF>>>>>>>> I ever WINNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN....EL LOTTOI spend money on real estate courses........and .......have lost... my assets ..on two... [ More ]

Reply #29

RJOh — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 02:00:27 GMT

Reddog,Live and learn and learning cost. I bought Lotto Pro and Lotto Buster a few years back, but I still prefer the program I wrote myself using GWBasic. I still use Lotto Pro because it has an update feature that I like which allows me to update all my lottery files without all the typing. Its files are in a format that I can transfer to my own program easily. I know how my program works, so I can add the features that I like. The only drawback is GWBasic was design when computer had less... [ More ]

Reply #28

reddog — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:25:29 GMT

RJOH, you are right. After a year,, I am seeing things alot more clearly.

Reply #27

RJOh — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:17:13 GMT

Psykomo,As far as I know Guru has only sold a few copies of his software to LP members and he charges what he thinks his time and effort are worth. If any player can't afford to lose a couple hundred dollars then he/she shouldn't play any lottery on a regular basis. The gambling odds in lotteries are designed such that there are a few big winners and lots of big losers and no software is going to change that. Guru has set the record straight about his software and now buyer should be more rea... [ More ]

Reply #26

reddog — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:58:25 GMT

And psykomo, what have you been drinking

Reply #25

reddog — Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:55:21 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 21, 2005 Now let me set something straight here:1.8 Will be a FREE UPGRADE when it is ready !!!. Nowhere on my website I claim that you WILL win........ If you want something that can turn odds of 1 against a Billion into 1 against 2 then you are dreaming.If I promise you a free upgrade ......, than that's a gift from me to you. 1.7 had bugs in it, remember???? It didn't predict past the number 34. All this hype that was I was caught into last year w... [ More ]

Reply #24

psykomo — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 23:58:27 GMT

WAY.....AH.....AAA.......to ........GO RJOH:We..... donot have time to research this site LP, from A to Z (100 percent), but, LATELY, I get the impression that GURU, has RIPPED -OFF thousands of LP viewers of this lottery systems discussion ...................................!!!! group??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????when I turn to this site for news, general information or simply to touch base with other people with a general interest in lottey or lotto subjects.As... [ More ]

Reply #23

RJOh — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:30:56 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 21, 2005Now let me set something straight here:1.8 Will be a FREE UPGRADE when it is ready !!!. Nowhere on my website I claim that you WILL win........ If you want something that can turn odds of 1 against a Billion into 1 against 2 then you are dreaming.If I promise you a free upgrade ......, than that's a gift from me to you. I think there is a lesson here for all lottery players. Don't buy lottery tickets or software unless you can afford to lose... [ More ]

Reply #22

Guru — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:45:41 GMT

Now let me set something straight here:Not a single customer bought Version 1.8 and did not get it !! because we still only sell version 1.6 together with 1.7 !!!!!1.8 Will be a FREE UPGRADE when it is ready !!!. (If I was after the money, I Would make you pay for the upgrades !!!)If someone feels uncomfortable with the price tag of the software, then you simply should not buy it !! (You don't buy a Ferrari too if you can't afford it)+ Nowhere on my website I claim that you WILL win. I only clai... [ More ]

Reply #21

paul762 — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:19:04 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by reddog on February 20, 2005 I'm sorry fbird!!!!! Did you cough up $100 like the rest of us whiners ?? Because if you had, you would be restless also. But I don't beleive you did. What if you had left your car in the shop for a fricking year to get it fixed and it still isn't fixed. What would you do? If Guru wasn't going to be able to finish what he had started at a respectable time frame then he shouldn't had put such a high price tag on the product to begin wi... [ More ]

Reply #20

RJOh — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:57:45 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by fbird on February 19, 2005I don't see any of you offering up a program, nor do any of you realize what goes into it. If you do then post it.I have a program that I started writing years ago in GWBasic. I learned a little Quick Basic, enough to compile it using a Q-Basic compiler. I bought Visual Basic, but I'm getting too old to learn new tricks so I decided that since the program was just for me, I would continue to update it using GWBasic, compile it and just run i... [ More ]

Reply #19

BobP — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:28:52 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by fbird on February 20, 2005Oops... Didn't know that there was money placed before a finished product was done. But then again, I never pay my car mechanic..before the work is done....do you remember what Barnum and Bailey use to say???It's a rare day I get my car back and the problems are fixed correctly the first time. The funny thing is, if Guru can find the time to get the program working, he won't have to worry about working after that because he'll be too busy co... [ More ]

Reply #18

fbird — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:53:16 GMT

Oops... Didn't know that there was money placed before a finished product was done. But then again, I never pay my car mechanic..before the work is done....do you remember what Barnum and Bailey use to say

Reply #17

reddog — Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:46:03 GMT

I'm sorry fbird!!!!! Did you cough up $100 like the rest of us whiners ?? Because if you had, you would be restless also. But I don't beleive you did. What if you had left your car in the shop for a fricking year to get it fixed and it still isn't fixed. What would you do? If Guru wasn't going to be able to finish what he had started at a respectable time frame then he shouldn't had put such a high price tag on the product to begin with.Now I have said my whining peace of mind.... [ More ]

Reply #16

fbird — Sun, 20 Feb 2005 02:38:26 GMT

You know, I look in on this thread from time to time and see all the bickering and whining.Some of us have JOBS that we have to tend to every single day, WE do have a boss to answer too. Guru is offering up a program and apparently has Way over shot his promise date . I work 11 to 12 hours a day and know that I am just completely wiped out and other than showering and eating, I sometimes am to drained to do anything.So maybe, just maybe Guru has over extended ones self and made a promise that

Reply #15

RJOh — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 04:52:02 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Guru on February 17, 2005After a long wait, I finally found some hours to further develop lottosync 1.8While analysing some test results, I stumbled upon something new that might make lottosync even better. Will this mean that lottosync 1.8 users will be able to get similar results and spend less?RJOh

Reply #14

LANTERN — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 03:11:56 GMT

Get it on time, you say?On time for Christmas you mean?Guru has a company to run, he is a very busy person.We would be lucky to get 1.8 by the end of the year.We get it when we do.

Reply #13

MillionsWanted — Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:18:40 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by paul762 on February 18, 2005 Quote: Originally posted by MillionsWanted on February 18, 2005 Quote: Originally posted by spock on February 18, 2005 Whats new this is all pie in the sky the only thing you can depend on is that we will have to wait even longer?Perhaps it's best if Guru waited with his new found feature till version 1.9 and released 1.8 on schedule ?But that's his decision of course. I was under the impression that the new feature would be in 1.8 and... [ More ]

Reply #12

dynodyno — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:02:38 GMT

Sounds great Guru!! I may have to start putting my order in for that Rolls-Royce

Reply #11

paul762 — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:43:32 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by MillionsWanted on February 18, 2005Quote: Originally posted by spock on February 18, 2005 Whats new this is all pie in the sky the only thing you can depend on is that we will have to wait even longer?Perhaps it's best if Guru waited with his new found feature till version 1.9 and released 1.8 on schedule ?But that's his decision of course.I was under the impression that the new feature would be in 1.8 and released on schedule , I thought it was just pc processing... [ More ]

Reply #10

MillionsWanted — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 12:56:46 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by spock on February 18, 2005 Whats new this is all pie in the sky the only thing you can depend on is that we will have to wait even longer?Perhaps it's best if Guru waited with his new found feature till version 1.9 and released 1.8 on schedule ?But that's his decision of course.

Reply #9

spock — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 11:12:34 GMT

Whats new this is all pie in the sky the only thing you can depend on is that we will have to wait even longer

Reply #8

paul762 — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:18:57 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by BobP on February 18, 2005The only correct answer is, What ever it takes to win.

Reply #7

BobP — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 07:51:23 GMT

See how it goes, maybe a 1.8 lite starter version (if it predicts correctly to some extent) would allow people to get a feel for the value potential of the super version 2.0. The only correct answer is, What ever it takes to win. Quick and loses is no way to win the lottery. BobP

Reply #6

LANTERN — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 02:44:54 GMT

that would be great......I just don't want to wait forever for it---------------Razielps. don't forget to email all us lottosycnh owners when the 1.8 is ready TksvickNo need to email everybody, just post here at the Lottery Post that it's ready, we will email you!Drawback is that it will add again a significant amount of processing time to the whole process.What's a few more hours if it really works better ?, But I still have more faith in the proper use of filtered wheels or as they say, To se... [ More ]

Reply #5

MillionsWanted — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:53:37 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Raziel on February 17, 2005I really don't mind having my system run all night knowing 1.8 will give me the best chance at winning especially in Keno. Looking forward to the money machine as well. thanks Guru!!!RazielLet's not get too excited, mmmkay?Let's see some results first, mmmkay

Reply #4

Raziel — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:38:04 GMT

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Drawback is that it will add again a significant amount of processing time to the whole process.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I really don't mind having my system run all night knowing 1.8 will give me the best chance at winning especially in Keno.Looking forward to the money machine... [ More ]

Reply #3

vick — Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:37:57 GMT

Reply #2

Raziel — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:48:25 GMT

Sounds good, if you feel it will improve it significantly that would be great......I just don't want to wait forever for it....it would be great if you can find the time and get this to us paying customers as soon as possible.Raziel

Reply #1

MillionsWanted — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 23:24:30 GMT

I hope you're right and look forward to see the test results.

Even a better lottosync 1.8 ??

Guru — Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:54:20 GMT

Hi all,After a long wait, I finally found some hours to further develop lottosync 1.8While analysing some test results, I stumbled upon something new that might make lottosync even better. If my feelings are correct about this, it may even bring us to a point of accuracy that is scary.I would like to stress the words might and may because it isn't tested in the actual engine yet. It's only in my head at the moment, but I have a feeling this may very well be IT.Drawback is that it will add agai... [ More ]