What prize is Lottosync aimed at?

Reply #45

paul762 — Wed, 09 Mar 2005 09:25:25 GMT

perhaps he's waiting for the chargeback time to expire so he wont have to deliver anything and people wont/cant get a refund, not really bothered anymore to tell you the truth.

Reply #44

reddog — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:21:07 GMT

When it first came out it was around $114.00 US dollars.

Reply #43

bd2lucky — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:01:00 GMT

How much does lottosync cost in U.S. dollars

Reply #42

LANTERN — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 20:57:14 GMT

Good Idea, but i have a very slow Pc, so can't do testing.

Reply #41

RJOh — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:20:55 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LANTERN on March 7, 2005Maybe LottoSync 1.8 (if we ever get it, it looks like we never will) might do better.The previous versions seem to do just a little better (but not much) than random chance maybe, just my opinion, but what do I know? Has anyone tested it's output with 10 random numbers within the same parameters over time. It's not that hard to do if you're using the program, simple pick 10 random numbers each time you use LottoSync and trace the winners in bo... [ More ]

Reply #40

LANTERN — Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:01:54 GMT

Maybe LottoSync 1.8 (if we ever get it, it looks like we never will) might do better.The previous versions seem to do just a little better (but not much) than random chance maybe, just my opinion, but what do I know?Lottosync 1.5 to 1.7 is not of any use to me as it does not support any of Texas' lottery games, if it could work on games like the TX2Step, Txcash5, TxLotto and MegaMilions then I could maybe use it.I know that Guru is a very busy person and has very little time nowdays for programm... [ More ]

Reply #39

hypersoniq — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:11:51 GMT

If you have 2 or more people looking at the same drawing with the same data and getting different results... then that is in the coding... where the random generation is getting it's seed from.I experimented with the synch concept (not software, just the idea from back in the initial posts) exhaustively... I used VB6 to create a seed miner that would scan the past draw history to discover which seed(s) would allow such a pick. These were stored to a text file and then compared for some sort of... [ More ]

Reply #38

MillionsWanted — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:06:17 GMT

Let's just let Guru finish version 1.8. Then we will see what it's good for.

Reply #37

lottosyncman — Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:24:35 GMT

canada 6/49 prediction at 20,000 samples for march 5 1,2,7,13,28,30,34,36,47,48 good luck

Reply #36

stoopendaal — Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:20:19 GMT

Hi,Result for the Duth lotto tonight (5 March): 5,9,10,27,31,43 + Bonus = 16predicted (see previous post) : 1-5-6-9-14-18-19-20-25-43.....Match 5,9 and 43...so again 3 right!..........HmmmmmSo the results for the last 4 Draws are : (3),(0) ,( 3+b),( 3) right.....chance,illusion or.....Dutch Lotto

Reply #35

stoopendaal — Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:14:21 GMT

Hi,Prediction Lostosync. 1.7 (12000 samples) for the Dutch Lotto :1-5-6-9-14-18-19-20-25-43

Reply #34

lottoshlep — Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:14:32 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by foxy on March 3, 2005I apologize for posting off topic. This post has enough information to win using Saliu's tools: https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107614.htmThat is if one is interested in learning how to use them.Hi Foxy,no apologies needed here. Somehow I missed that thread, but now I have some more reading to do. Thanks for pointing out.Cheers

Reply #33

foxy — Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:09:00 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by lottoshlep on March 3, 2005 PS if you can win some decent cash with Saliu's systems more power to ya, and please show us how, we'll be waiting with baited breath ... and it's a given that we'll expect it all for free!I apologize for posting off topic. This post has enough information to win using Saliu's tools: https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/107614.htmThat is if one is interested in learning how to use them.

Reply #32

lottoshlep — Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:17:49 GMT

Hey Xavier,all I see are more faulty assumptions on your part but who cares ...Btw, you know nothing about me and what I know, and even less about Lottosynch. Comparing your system to Marco's program is like the proverbial apples and oranges thinghy. And I would be surprised if he even bothers replying to your simplistic approach. Whether or not he tries to refute your claims proves absolutely nothing.But hey, it's your prerogative to placate or delude yourself into believing you're right .... [ More ]

Reply #31

xavier102772 — Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:41:52 GMT

Suffice it to say again.....Do you see Guru refuting my claims......nope.....because I am right.lottoshlep, you have no clue do you? The strategy I outlined is there for anyone to use and test to determine if it is any good. So is Guru's. I have already calculated most of the odds to my strategy almost entirely for you and have shown how much better it is than random. Guru has shown you jack and likely never will! Anyway, if any of you really want to get some real help/ideas/strategies/knowl... [ More ]

Reply #30

lottoshlep — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 23:53:45 GMT

Well, here's a kettle calling us black as far as being objective goes ... re-read some posts and then discuss objectivity.OK Xavier, if your strategy is so powerful why don't you take some of your own medicine and go make a pile of $$ instead of disecting a program you know very little about? Or better yet, post some preds for the 6/49 and let us decide if it holds any merit?Until you can show us you can do better I reserve the right to think your ideas can only fill a hot air baloon.Now go ahea... [ More ]

Reply #29

xavier102772 — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 23:23:18 GMT

there is no getting through to you people....didn't I say I'd buy it, if it offered a money back guarantee......only a couple of you (RJOH and stoopendaal) seem to actually be reading and understanding what I'm saying about Lottosync's predicting method . If the rest of you read what I wrote, understood it, thought about it for a minute objectively and looked at your own data history, you'd see too. Do you see Guru refuting my claims......nope.....because I am right.Anyway I'm done dicussing... [ More ]

Reply #28

paul762 — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:29:53 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by vick on March 3, 2005 this poor xavier, hey buddy pay for it yourself and test it.

Reply #27

Raziel — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:00:54 GMT

I have to agree with Vick and Lottoshelp.....If you want to test it buy the program yourself like we have...I've tested both 1.6 and 1.7 and both tested better then any program I've previously used.....As of now I am patiently awaiting the arrival of LS 1.8.Raziel

Reply #26

vick — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:46:03 GMT

this poor xavier, hey buddy pay for it yourself and test it.

Reply #25

lottoshlep — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:09:44 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by xavier102772 on March 3, 2005<<snip>> it's my theory, based on the way lottery numbers behave, that his predicting is simply derived from the past 3 draws mainly <<snip>>. I just told you my testing shows otherwise yet you keep pushing your theory . Why don't you just wait like everybody else and then buy the new version if you're that interested in disapproving? I don't think it's a good idea to ask for someone to give you their program ... and good luck getting... [ More ]

Reply #24

xavier102772 — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:47:17 GMT

funny vick.....must have hit a nerve or something.stoopendaal,would you mind running though the test with Lottosync? If you just take your set of data for your drawing of choice, remove the last 100 draws and save them somewhere else, then keep adding draws, running Lottosync once, and repeating the process. This will give the definitive answer. It shouldn't take too long....I know he posted one of his tickets but that is not proof, coming from the designer of the software. I could make a pr... [ More ]

Reply #23

lottoshlep — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:28:59 GMT

To make conclusions about a program without ever testing it and to assume how it picks numbers based on minimal info is very nearsighted to say the least. It almost looks to me like Xavier has a different aim in mind, and that is to engage Guru by provoking a response, at best, or maybe to irritate the users who are already frustrated with the updated sw delay. The intentions are not overly clear so I won't speculate further.Without going into specifics, after lenghty tests with 3 separate lot... [ More ]

Reply #22

stoopendaal — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:21:47 GMT

xavier102772,3 weeks ago I started to test Lottosync. 1.7 for the dutch lotto, here the results :Lottosync. 1.7 , samples 12000 ; predicted 3+b ... for last draw ( only one run)prediction for 2 draws ago : predicted 0 right (samples 12000)prediction for 3 draws ago : predicted 3 right (samples 12000)...Coincidence, chance , illusion or ....? I will post the prediction for the Saturday (05 march) drawing soon....

Reply #21

paul762 — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 11:11:42 GMT

with respect to guru, he did post 1 of his winning tickets using the new prediction engine.

Reply #20

xavier102772 — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 05:30:15 GMT

That's what I was thinking too when all these guys were saying stuff about how long it takes Lotttosync to do it's predicting . From the posts of people on here about Lottosync, the illusion sure has people convinced Lottosync is doing much more than it actually is.

Reply #19

RJOh — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 05:02:05 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by xavier102772 on March 2, 2005PS - foxy, RJOH.....that's exactly what Guru's software is doing, just picking randomly from the reduced sets of numbers(12-18 in the previous 3 draws, and very likely the same in the next previous set of 3 draws). That's why everyone will get a different set of numbers, that is why every time you run it you will get a different set of numbers. Too bad not everyone else sees it. If what you suspect is true then the software must contain... [ More ]

Reply #18

vick — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:36:20 GMT

well, i really don't care what your saying xavier because you've never tried the program, i myself have won money with it ; and have it as 1 of my arsenal of tools in winning the Tax free lotto money. Best of look to you and don't get run over in the calgary Stampede

Reply #17

xavier102772 — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:31:52 GMT

Just wondering is the following link not the Lottosync software I am talking about made by Guru? http://www.lottosync.com/If it is, then yes, the past 3 draws is his main form of predicting numbers. It says so in the top blurb. Just from looking at the screen capture you can see that 6 out of the 10 predicted numbers are from the past 3 draws. The other predicting likely occurs in the next 3 draws, which opens up the probablilities substantially to getting more numbers in the group of 10. Did... [ More ]

Reply #16

foxy — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:04:04 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by RJOh on March 2, 2005 From what I've read, the results are different for everyone using it for the same game. Since there is only one result per drawing per game, I would think the actually predicted numbers would be the same for anyone playing the same game, else it's no better than picking 10 random numbers.RJOhI agree... in most cases it will probably be much worse than random picks.

Reply #15

RJOh — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:37:02 GMT

From what I've read, the results are different for everyone using it for the same game. Since there is only one result per drawing per game, I would think the actually predicted numbers would be the same for anyone playing the same game, else it's no better than picking 10 random numbers.RJOh

Reply #14

lottosyncman — Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:14:59 GMT

everybody seems to be missing gurus point here is that lottosync uses the last 3 draws as a guide to project what might happen in the future it usues all the 49 numbers as potential winners and then gives the most probable 10 numbers

Reply #13

xavier102772 — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:53:37 GMT

Yep, good stuff RJOH. You are correct. That's pretty much the same as what I got from the 6/49 in Canada. I think you may know where I'm coming from here. Perhaps I wasn't very clear to others about what I'm trying to get at, so here it is again:1. I know Lottosync is better than picking 10 random numbers out of 49.2. I know the basis of the software is looking at the previous 3 draws to choose 10.3. I know the odds of getting a 3 of 6 prize in a 6/49 game is 1 in 56. And I know that by... [ More ]

Reply #12

foxy — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:38:57 GMT

Xavier:If the software is unable to produce 6# matches in tests it isn't worth your time or money. You are going to end up chasing the lower prizes and never 'really' win.I personally don't believe in black box software. It's made for gamblers; not players.

Reply #11

RJOh — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:29:02 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by xavier102772 on March 2, 2005ok, I already know it uses a 3 draw history. Question is....is the software aimed at picking only 3 number prizes and has anyone tested it to see if it actually does better than random expectation? I checked OhioSuperLottoPlus 479 draws and in 475 drawings using the previous 3 drawings there were pools of 12-18 numbers and those pools contained the following:all six winning numbers 2 times5 winning numbers 5 times4 winning numbers 39 time... [ More ]

Reply #10

vick — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 18:05:58 GMT

i already told you i compared random sets in ontario 49 with it and lottosycn was beating the random average! random of the last 3 or last 10 or any draws is still random !!You really have to buy the program to see why it wasn't meant for keno. At least do some leg work and search the boards here for the info.The program doesn't give the exact same sets predicted everytime, so even if alot of people have the program their sets will be different. Xavier do you own any lottery programs? what do yo... [ More ]

Reply #9

xavier102772 — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:48:47 GMT

Thanks for the bit of information, but still my point has been missed I think. I know the software is going to be better than average . I think I've already established that fact. But is it really any better than simply applying the strategy I outlined above? Also, if somebody thinks it is, please show us the proof, meaning lottery, data set, calculations and Lottosync predictions against actual draws. Vick:On a side note, how are you using it to pick Keno...I'm not very familiar with Keno... [ More ]

Reply #8

paul762 — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:12:10 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by xavier102772 on March 1, 2005I've read a lot of posts about Guru's Lottosync program and am really wondering what the big deal is. I'm not a 100% certain but it seems to me that the software is aimed at the 3 number prizes in a lottery, ie. 3/6 prize. So let's see if I go it right, he says that the last 3 draws are the only ones that matter to his prediction software, correct? Now, 3 out of 6 numbers come up about 29% of the time in a 6/49 game from the last 3 draw... [ More ]

Reply #7

Guru — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:55:02 GMT

Xavier:Lottosync does not select it's numbers just from the last 3 draws. It also selects probable numbers that do not occur in the last three draws.Those last three draws are just the guideline for lottosync to make the prediction.

Reply #6

vick — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:39:06 GMT

that's why were waiting for 1.8, the previous versions had certain bugs, but even with those bugs people were hitting. Winning the top prize is gunna take ALOT of luck, with any kinda system or software, personally i never aim for the jackpot, i set my sights lower, for example, if i can get lottosycn to get me 8/10's and 7/10's in keno, then if i wheel the sets in 6's and 8's i have a good chance of hitting the $1000 and $25,000 prizes. I have already hit the $1000 using this method.i did do a... [ More ]

Reply #5

xavier102772 — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 07:05:54 GMT

I didn't say it was impossible to get 5 numbers just very unlikely. If you look in any data set of a 6/49 game, you'll see that getting all 5 numbers from the past 3 draws does happen, but on the order of 1 in 125 draws or so. However, I haven't seen all 6 numbers in the previous 3 draws in any of my data for the 6/49 games in Canada. Which I assume would be the same for most everyone else's 6/49 game. Anyway, think about it you said yourself that you've seen 1 set of 5 numbers come up in wh... [ More ]

Reply #4

lottosyncman — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:43:41 GMT

thats right back in nov 2003 i hit 5 numbers in my group of 10 unfortunately it only gave me 4 number prizes! i used lottosync1.6 at that time it has only happened once though

Reply #3

vick — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:09:38 GMT

lottosyncman hit 5/ 10 on canada 649 and i think he got a 5/6 in his wheels.i used to get 3/10 and 4/10 playing ontario 49i got 8/10 and 7's/10 in keno - note that the program was not designed for high number keno games, i'm thinking 1.8 will fix that

Reply #2

xavier102772 — Wed, 02 Mar 2005 06:03:54 GMT

ok, I already know it uses a 3 draw history. Question is....is the software aimed at picking only 3 number prizes and has anyone tested it to see if it actually does better than random expectation? I don't have it, so I can't test it myself and I'm not about to spend the money on it if someone else who has it can do the testing. From what I've seen posted about Lottosync's prediction, it pretty much has only got 3 numbers out of 10. Has anyone got 4 out of 10? 5 out of 10? I bet not. Why,... [ More ]

Reply #1

MillionsWanted — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:57:09 GMT

At the moment it uses only a 3 draw history. See for yourself at http://www.lottosync.com/.The future version 1.8 I think is meant to use 30 draws.

What prize is Lottosync aimed at?

xavier102772 — Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:44:35 GMT

I've read a lot of posts about Guru's Lottosync program and am really wondering what the big deal is. I'm not a 100% certain but it seems to me that the software is aimed at the 3 number prizes in a lottery, ie. 3/6 prize. So let's see if I go it right, he says that the last 3 draws are the only ones that matter to his prediction software, correct? Now, 3 out of 6 numbers come up about 29% of the time in a 6/49 game from the last 3 draws. You can check this out with Ion Salui's MDIEDIT softw... [ More ]