<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Mega Billions</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/109042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Mega Billions</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #21</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349398</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349398</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:20:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tg636</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>http://forbes.com/home/billionaires/2005/03/09/bill05land.htmlEven the biggest Megamillions winner is a drop in the bucket to the really rich.</p>]]></description>
			<category>tg636</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #20</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349140</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349140</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 03:06:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think huge odds could be successful if you had two jackpots. California makes this possible for Mega Millions.  You could have a rolling jackpot similar to the current one, odds of 1:135,000,000, and then another rolling jackpot with odds of 1:1,000,000,000 that would just roll on forever and ever. 70% of the jackpot money could go to the regular 1:135M odds, which, when California joins, could mean similar rolls to what we see now.  Then 30% would go into the mega jackpot which would roll unt... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349140">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #19</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349109</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349109</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:45:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Or maybe a Canadian will win, and they&#x27;ll donate it to Windsor.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #18</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349092</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349092</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:26:43 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>keepitreal</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Said it go pass 1 billions said 1.5 billions. They don&#x27;t get that much. They take  alot outta it for taxes but still like 500 Millions is alot. I think they should go with it. See who will get all that money. I think someone from Detroit should win and then give money to rebuild Detroit.</p>]]></description>
			<category>keepitreal</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #17</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349087</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/349087</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 01:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>tg:Hot Lotto, not Mass Megais bad$.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #16</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348953</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348953</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 20:47:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tg636</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The problem is this is too much. Too long odds, too much money for any single person. If anything like this ever happened, I&#x27;ll stop any  Mega  game and go something smaller and saner.</p>]]></description>
			<category>tg636</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #15</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348806</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348806</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:19:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If Mega Millions goes higher than 1 in 200 million, I will stop playing.</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #14</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348488</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348488</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 23:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Blalron</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I think 200 million or so should be enough to satisfy ANYBODY.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Blalron</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #13</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348396</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348396</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 20:26:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>We&#x27;ll never have a world lottery.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #12</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348174</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348174</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2005 05:44:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Annual Payments</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by ryanm on March 8, 2005Quote: Originally posted by DoctorEw220 on March 7, 2005i think it could work, but maybe if it were something along the lines of 5/99+1/70. the odds would be really hard, but it wuld mean huge jackpot runs.  The odds of matching all six numbers would then be 1 in 5,006,620,080!wow!!!  I think that would work with if we had a world lottery.  But that does seem a bit steep.There would be absolutely no way I would take cash on a billion dollar jackp... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/348174">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Annual Payments</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347760</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347760</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by DoctorEw220 on March 7, 2005i think it could work, but maybe if it were something along the lines of 5/99+1/70. the odds would be really hard, but it wuld mean huge jackpot runs.  The odds of matching all six numbers would then be 1 in 5,006,620,080</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347669</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347669</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 07:06:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>dvdiva</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>More like mega-assinine.I doubt any game will jump over the 1:200 million mark any time soon. But that&#x27;s really over the top.The highest I could ever see a game hitting is maybe close to the 300 million mark. Might work though if it&#x27;s China&#x27;s or India&#x27;s national lottery. With over a billion potential players you would have to have high odds.</p>]]></description>
			<category>dvdiva</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347489</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347489</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 23:05:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>DoctorEw220</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>i think it could work, but maybe if it were something along the lines of 5/99+1/70. the odds would be really hard, but it wuld mean huge jackpot runs.</p>]]></description>
			<category>DoctorEw220</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347439</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347439</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 21:34:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>twisted</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by jsk2001 on March 7, 2005........if I did win, i&#x27;d better stay inside for awhile  Only if you have clouds over you. Otherwise, enjoy your newfound wealth.</p>]]></description>
			<category>twisted</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347393</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347393</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 19:37:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jsk2001</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>ODDS OF BECOMING A LIGHTNING VICTIMU.S. 2000 Census population      280,000,000Odds of being struck by lightning in a given year (reported deaths + injuries)      1/700,000Odds of being struck by lightning in a given year (estimated total deaths + injuries)      1/240,000Odds of being struck in your lifetime (Est. 80 years)      1/3000Odds you will be affected by someone being struck (Ten people affected for every one struck)if I did win, i&#x27;d better stay inside for awhile</p>]]></description>
			<category>jsk2001</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347364</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347364</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 18:46:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ryanm</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>635.6 million to one odds!!? Are you f**king crazy!!?  There&#x27;s almost no way anyone can win that! The only people who want $1 billion jackpots are the lottery folks so they can make more money off of people&#x27;s stupidity.</p>]]></description>
			<category>ryanm</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347280</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347280</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 15:48:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jsk2001</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>5+2 seems like the next stepEuro Millions is 5/50 + 2/9</p>]]></description>
			<category>jsk2001</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347239</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347239</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 14:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>CASH Only</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Euro Millions has the 5+2 format.</p>]]></description>
			<category>CASH Only</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347159</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347159</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 08:50:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>golotto</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;d certainly participate in the 5+2 game (if the tickets were priced the same as Powerball) with those odds only when the jackpot was $250 Million or greater.</p>]]></description>
			<category>golotto</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347122</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347122</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 05:18:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>jsk2001</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Some more possible namesSuper BillionsJumbo JackpotPowerbillionsPowerballs</p>]]></description>
			<category>jsk2001</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347089</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042/347089</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 04:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JimmySand9</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by JAG331 on March 6, 2005 Thank you for joining us, tonight&#x27;s Mega Billions drawing jackpot is an estimated 1 billion 588 milllllllllllion dollars, and the first number up is...Geez. That doesn&#x27;t sound like Glenn Burns. Were planning on replacing him with, like, Champ Kind</p>]]></description>
			<category>JimmySand9</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mega Billions</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2005 04:03:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JAG331</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Here&#x27;s a format that Powerball or Mega Millions could adopt.5/50 + 2/25.Match 5+2: Odds 1:635,628,000.  Rolling jackpot, minimum $50,000,000.Match 5+1: Odds 1:13,818,000.  $2,000,000 payout!Match 5+0: Odds around 1:2,500,000.  $300,000 payout!Additional payouts for 4+2, 4+1, 4+0, so on and so forth, down to 1+1.$2,000,000 for second prize!  And who wouldn&#x27;t want to play for a jackpot that rolls to one or two billion!It&#x27;s a deceptively simple matrix, and the lottery could afford to pay out 50-55... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109042">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JAG331</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

