<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Prediction Statistics Validity?</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/109710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Prediction Statistics Validity?</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354743</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354743</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:56:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>jking,What you are describing is essentially the hit ratio on this site.  Although it is calculated a little differently, if you tallied up the  scores  over time using either method, they would turn out to be approximately the same.  I personally think the Lottery Post method of calculating hit ratios is better, because rather than just using a raw score, it focuses on matches that actually form winning tickets, rather than raw matches, which mean different things for different games.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354674</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:26:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd,  What I mean by a capture ratio would be if you got 2 number right in a pick 5 game, then you would have captured two. Then 2/5 would be .4. A system that has a higher ratio over time will yeild more winners. It also indicates accuracy, consistency, and whether or not the system really has a sound foundation. Systems with the higher capture ratios will also be the best ones to use if your wheeling or even deciding who prediction to use as your own. I could go on, but....    Thanks for aski... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354674">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354647</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354647</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:48:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>jking: I am not sure what  number capture ratio  means.</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354578</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354578</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:56:27 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Todd,    You&#x27;ve got the best thing going on the web, including your statistics pages. And I really do understand how many requests you get and how demanding it must be. So, simply consider the above another request. And know that it is a great measure of who is starting to get it right in the inexact science of lottery predictions.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354560</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354560</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:31:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I provide the stats for the membership as a free service.  It&#x27;s up to you:If you want to pay attention to them or notWhether one stat is more important than anotherI had anticipated this kind of message being posted, which is why I specified on every member&#x27;s predictions stats page:Lottery predictions are not an exact science, and there is no  right  way to utilize this information.  These reports do not show who is a  good  predictor and who is  bad , but rather should be used as another tool t... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354560">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354553</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710/354553</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:19:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with waht your saying. I&#x27;ve even made requests for including it in the prediction tracking here. The accuracy or higher number capture ratio will really tell you if your on the right track.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Prediction Statistics Validity?</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>LuckyFoxTerrier</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#x27;ve missed previous discussion of this topic, but lately I&#x27;ve become obsessed with reading the member&#x27;s predictions statistics ... esp. those who are in the daily winner&#x27;s circle.  I am wondering:1.  What is the average hit ratio among all members?2.  What&#x27;s more important to you all, hit ratio or prize ratio? 3.  Do statistics really matter in the end anyways?4.  If a person has a higher hit ratio than others does that mean he has a better chance of winning the big jackpot?5.  Is anyone... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/109710">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>LuckyFoxTerrier</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

