<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>gail howard wheels or.......</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/110442" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: gail howard wheels or.......</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #12</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/361010</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/361010</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 03:46:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>relowe</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Greg,I do concur with your thinking. Number selection (or rejection) has to be the primary process. After you have this part sorted out use the best wheel you can both find and afford. There are no doubt numerous numbers generaters out there based on their background algorithms, and some of these will be better than others, but these HCD systems in steering you to some number set can&#x27;t in reality be no worse than luck but on the other hand they could do a lot better than luck.So while one might... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/361010">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>relowe</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #11</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360956</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360956</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 01:16:56 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,I especially like Gail&#x27;s Chart #4.  I rarely use wheels-- Gail&#x27;s or someone else&#x27;s-- because I choose to believe that number selection is important.  Using the familiar parameters or particular characteristics of the game I play, I combine numbers utilizing her various charts. I&#x27;d like to hear more about how lotto players here select or pick their numbers to go in the wheel they use. I&#x27;d also like to hear if players bypass making their own selection of numbers (based on a study of the cha... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360956">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Greg</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #10</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360168</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360168</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:18:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>four4me</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by tom.s on March 31, 2005whatever wheel software that is out there. i am fairly new to this board, i do like to come on and read the posts here. like i mentioned before i just bought gail howards software. unless this has been posted before has anyone who purchased wheels of anyone had any significant luck with them? after spending 3 weeks on studying gails software, charts, books i have only used them twice but nothing yet. i am curious as with gail howards software do... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360168">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>four4me</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #9</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360164</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360164</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 15:04:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by relowe on April 2, 2005tom.s, very comprehensive wheels, including if they are at WR rating or not, at Lotto Architect plus the program to use them in. See their web site.rreloweyes I have to agree, and the new feature I havent seen before looks excellent.</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #8</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360071</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360071</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 08:20:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MillionsWanted</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by Maverick on April 2, 2005Yea her A+ price is a bit pricey, but it is a very good tool in terms of the information it provides, plus the draws can be updated free, which Ion Saliu likes. Before I bought it I found detailed information about it in her site. Otherwise I would have never bought it.I found a link to more information about Advantage Plus now.Why I didn&#x27;t find it the first time is beyond me...</p>]]></description>
			<category>MillionsWanted</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360070</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360070</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 07:22:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>relowe</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>tom.s, very comprehensive wheels, including if they are at WR rating or not, at Lotto Architect plus the program to use them in. See their web site.rrelowe</p>]]></description>
			<category>relowe</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360024</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360024</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 05:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Maverick</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Quote: Originally posted by MillionsWanted on April 1, 2005Her software is quite expensive.There is very little information available about the features in Gail Howards software.Almost everyone else who sells lottery software on the internet is wise enough to present all the features available.Yea her A+ price is a bit pricey, but it is a very good tool in terms of the information it provides, plus the draws can be updated free, which Ion Saliu likes.Before I bought it I found detailed informati... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/360024">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Maverick</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359868</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359868</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 01:37:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>BobP</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>TomA wheel is the part of the lottery process that works exactly as promised if properly made and loaded.  Like a net woven of numbers to catch a prize if the wheel promises you will have a 4# winning line if all 5 of the winning numbers are among those you loaded the wheel with, then that is the minimum of what must happen.  In a sense the wheel is like the gear box, perfected and working smoothly when your prediction engine does.The Gail Howard is a wonder research tool, but not very good at p... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359868">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>BobP</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359830</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359830</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2005 00:21:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>tom.s,Lottery Post has a great wheel for Mega Millions.  It&#x27;s in the Pick 5 wheels, and you use every number 1-52, play 40 lines, and you&#x27;re guaranteed at least a 2+0 match.  Plus, if you use 40 different Mega numbers, you have a 77% chance of at least a 0+1.Also, any Pick 5 wheel can similarly be used for Mega Millions.  Lottery Post has tons of Pick 5 wheels.  In my opinion the Abbreviated wheels are best. All the wheels can be found by clicking Wheels in the Resource menu.To get access to eve... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359830">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Todd</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359769</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359769</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 21:53:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tom.s</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>thanx for the info, has anyone in here had some success with them? the wheeling of 8 numbers out of 52 for mega millions seems almost impossible to capture all 5 winning numbers, but you would think someone would of done it by now for that 5 of 5 guarantee. i find that some of her charts are really good if you trust them. also in mega millions, and i am sure everyone has tapped into this, one the numbers do repeat, and they come out the next drawing either one number above or below the last draw... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359769">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>tom.s</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359404</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359404</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 11:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>MillionsWanted</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Her software is quite expensive.There is very little information available about the features in Gail Howards software.Almost everyone else who sells lottery software on the internet is wise enough to present all the features available.</p>]]></description>
			<category>MillionsWanted</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359397</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442/359397</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 10:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>paul762</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>hi tom, no I wouldnt use the smart picks, but the charts etc. are quite good, I also believe she has more software available in about two months or so.</p>]]></description>
			<category>paul762</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>gail howard wheels or.......</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 03:28:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tom.s</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>whatever wheel software that is out there. i am fairly new to this board, i do like to come on and read the posts here. like i mentioned before i just bought gail howards software. unless this has been posted before has anyone who purchased wheels of anyone had any significant luck with them? after spending 3 weeks on studying gails software, charts, books i have only used them twice but nothing yet. i am curious as with gail howards software do the veterans of this find this worth studying week... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/110442">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>tom.s</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

