<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Blackjack and auto-shufflers</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114616</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/114616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Blackjack and auto-shufflers</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Blackjack and auto-shufflers</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114616</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114616</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2005 13:45:38 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Rip Snorter</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>If you happen  to be an excellent casino blackjack player, but hate autoshufflers (as I did until a few days ago) I&#x27;d like to share something with you that will help you make them wish they&#x27;d never installed the damned things.  It takes advantage of the 51:49 odds in favor of the house, the fact that those autoshufflers give the most thorough mechanical shuffle possible by the time they&#x27;ve been at it for a few hours, and the fact the machines are mostly on minimum limit tables.It&#x27;s got me playin... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/114616">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>Rip Snorter</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

