chaos

Reply #34

hypersoniq — Sat, 15 Oct 2005 23:43:10 GMT

If there is anything to V-Dude's if you're meant to mantra, I got that covered with my quick pick for the PB... just one, no more systems for me. It's my theory that the only possible involvement of God in the lottery is to test the 10th commandment (the one about coveting your neighbor's posessions)... and to this end there is plenty of cases where some would think a winner didn't deserve to win ( Action Jack-son Whittaker comes to mind)... If you can not let that bug you, then I think there... [ More ]

Reply #33

pacattack05 — Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:51:25 GMT

I will never be able to predict correctly most of the time...atleast not yet.....however...I have tools that might give me an impetus to further the analyzation of the untapped parts of a universe not so popular.Parts yet discovered. If you remember...the thread is based on chaos...not an applicable item.....nothing wrong with applications....just not the main goal in my little ol mind.RJOH is totally correct......Until I can solve this problem.....it's nothing but small talk....It's the only wa... [ More ]

Reply #32

Tenaj — Thu, 13 Oct 2005 23:35:13 GMT

Reply #31

pacattack05 — Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:51:07 GMT

I find it very interesting...I mean your take on it...I interpret what you said like this.....Imagine if every single one of those trillions of cells were thinking in concert, then one woudn't need any guessing, would they? Since we only use 1/10 of our brain, well....you only get a 10 percent payout. LOLSome have actually claimed that they have documentation of the contraversial issue of being able to move objects with his ( Einstein's ) mind.....Mathematics????? Maybe....But then we can move o... [ More ]

Reply #30

Rick G — Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:03:18 GMT

The universe and all of its elements are based on balance . What appears to be chaotic will in the long run not be chaotic. An orbit of a planet around its sun or an electron around an atom may appear to be chaotic but is truly balanced regardless of its path of orbit. Our human body composed of a trillion cells operates the same way.If balance was not the true nature of the universe, it couldn't exist as it is and we wouldn't be here right now.I think the same concept applies to numbers dra... [ More ]

Reply #29

pacattack05 — Sun, 18 Sep 2005 08:40:50 GMT

You should continue to be a lovely person.

Reply #28

daveyctvr — Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:18:14 GMT

This post is for 'pacattack05' and i am offering my support to you on this forum we seem to have the same ideas about patterns and systems and that in random chaos there are actually patterns and these can be used to your advantage however you seem to be persecuted on a daily basis becuse of your beliefs, i suffer the same from work collegues, family and friends. PPeople dont seem to have an open-mind and i share your confusion to why these people even join a forum like this. My first ever post... [ More ]

Reply #27

DustyCanuck — Sat, 20 Aug 2005 20:04:47 GMT

Paint1 I'm missing something here. There are patterns to all single prime numbers. Could you tell me how your work out works so I can understand your point better.

Reply #26

johnph77 — Tue, 16 Aug 2005 08:35:16 GMT

paint1 -No flame intended. Apologies if taken out of intended meaning.glj

Reply #25

paint1 — Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:57:10 GMT

Stoopendaal I stand corrected! You are right 9 is not a prime number.Johnph77, neither is the number 1. However you are correct about probability; that will teach me to rush into something. I've had my foot in my mouth before.On the other hand one doesn't have to look far to find many patterns.

Reply #24

johnph77 — Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:07:48 GMT

There are five prime single-digit numbers - 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7.Paint -In the example you give, you have selected the numbers 2, 3, 5, 7 and 9. In 13 draws there will be 39 numbers drawn. Of those numbers drawn, the numbers you selected appear 21 times, which is not outside the normal limits of mathematical probability, 19 or 20 times being the most expected occurance. Is there something I'm missing here

Reply #23

stoopendaal — Mon, 15 Aug 2005 07:53:49 GMT

Hi paint, My proof that patterns trends do exist; the prime numbers 2 3 5 7 9 9 is not a prime number.A Prime number is a whole number greater than 1 that can only be divided evenly by itself and 1You can divide 9 by 1 ,3 and 9 so it's not a prime number. Goodbye,Harm

Reply #22

paint1 — Mon, 15 Aug 2005 00:50:31 GMT

My proof that patterns trends do exist; the prime numbers 2 3 5 7 9Western Canada pick 3 numbers for August. 1 246 prime 2 2 033 33 3 490 9 4 263 23 5 479 79

Reply #21

DustyCanuck — Thu, 11 Aug 2005 04:51:56 GMT

Interesting views, NemeSys has brought forward the best points. Chaos is not random, it, chaos has definite patterns just look at the art. The balls thinking knowing which one of its buddys are going to drop next, ludicrous, well sponge bob may disagree. The only real repeatability I have found in a series of lottery balls is that of when a 1 drops out there is usually other balls that come out more often when a 1 comes out as opposed to others. If you want to eliminate patterns check history... [ More ]

Reply #20

LOTTOMIKE — Thu, 28 Jul 2005 09:17:28 GMT

Reply #19

NemeSys — Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:24:05 GMT

An interesting thread, but a little misunderstanding here and there.The phrase lottery balls have no memory of previous draws does not imply that lottery balls are living things with bad memories; it means that draws are not Markov chains, i.e. the result of a given draw does not affect subsequent ones (however, within a draw is a different matter: as balls are removed the odds on drawing one of the remaining numbers increases. The same thing happens in Blackjack; the variation in odds is the

Reply #18

JKING — Mon, 04 Jul 2005 12:25:30 GMT

I think you have to look a chaos theory with a jaundiced eye. If I have it right, chaos theory presumes no bounds(unbounded). Lotto numbers on the other hand ARE bounded by the pool size of the numbers being picked.The other thing is that nobody, that I am aware of, has bridged the gap from theory to usable lottery analysis. If I'm wrong, please post it.

Reply #17

LANTERN — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:55:15 GMT

VisionI stink at math too, but lottery wise all that we need is addition, substraction, division and multiplication and God of course.Good luck.

Reply #16

visiondude — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:42:30 GMT

he (God) ....can (and does IMO) ....choose the winning numbers. but it is more because he is God and knows the future more than something scientific . future history is past history to God. we are merely catching up to it.but before someone runs with this one, remember that it is God (if there is one) that controls how much information we will ever need as it pertains to the future. we will never be able to step over those boundaries. that is where the bones of futile men are laid. the

Reply #15

pacattack05 — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 03:02:47 GMT

It has no boundries.There is no point where you say, It is done How can something that has no boundries, exist simoultaneously, as we speak?It's impossible.The everyday laws of physics, don't even allow such a thing to exist.It goes against every rule in the book.Chaos means anything goes.Chaos also has no boundries.When you see patterns and trends, you are only seeing a short term trend.A group of scientists proposed that if you could travel far back into space, with a strongtelescope to view... [ More ]

Reply #14

LANTERN — Wed, 29 Jun 2005 01:43:44 GMT

Just to maybe give some examples, the universe is finite even if it does have its expansions and contractions, it is a pocket universe and yet for all practical purposes it's infinite and even if it has ends, or borders or given dimentions (more or less) it is impossible to go to or to reach those borders and it is also impossible to break thru and to go across to where-ever or what-ever to beyond or to unknown So the same with random it might not be or exist, but for all human practica... [ More ]

Reply #13

pacattack05 — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:48:35 GMT

I think both Nanook and Rjoh are correct.Random is random, and that is a correct statement, however, conditions that makethat outcome reality, are extremely important.Example: If god can choose the winning numbers every night, It's not because(in my opinion) of magic, or anything supernatural.It's because he knows the conditions inside and outside of the tubes that hold the balls.The air around each ball, the temperature, the minute static electrical activities,and so on.The only way he would be... [ More ]

Reply #12

RJOh — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:33:13 GMT

Nanook,You have describe randomness. The possible outcomes are so numerous that it's impossible to control the conditions to create any particular outcome. If the outcomes were as simple as 2+2=4 or 2x2=4, every body would be winning.RJOh

Reply #11

Nanook — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:40:24 GMT

I believe there is no such thing as random. Things appear random because we don't know all the factors that control the results.I'll try to explain what I mean by using a coin toss.I believe if you flip a coin with your hand in the Exact same position, the coin in the exact same spot in your hand, applying the exact same amount of force, the coin going up the exact same distance with the exact same amount of rotation hitting the exact same spot on the floor at the exact same angle you will allwa... [ More ]

Reply #10

pacattack05 — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 14:04:25 GMT

I'll try it, Thanx.

Reply #9

Todd — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:48:44 GMT

pacattack05,I'd recommend that you check out Platinum membership here, because it will do a lot of the things that you need - a whole lot cheaper than systems out there for sale. Like (for example) the Inspector 3 system will take a look at ant list of Pick 3 numbers and give you a complete breakdown of their properties. CalifDude has posted some very good examples of how to use it to root out hidden numbers to play. Also, the Deflate 3 system takes any list of Pick 3 numbers and separates... [ More ]

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 13:21:44 GMT

Atlasshrugged: I totally aree with you.I'm ashamed to confess, that Most of my wins,were due to gut feelings,rather than twisting my brain 100 times over.I had a friend who's ex-wife, dreamed numbers that came out 3 out of the 5 times.I also played those numbers and won $1500.00, in total.I think using the long-term thinking, that mentioned earlier on this post, along withpulling some hair with systems, and like you said, staring at numbers, is the bestway to pick the correct numbers.One day I p... [ More ]

Reply #7

atlasshrugged — Tue, 28 Jun 2005 03:40:35 GMT

Pacattack05, though I am having a little bit of a difficult time understanding your posts, once I get the meaning I have to say that I am mostly in agreement. Or at least what I understand. My husband has a theory about my number picking. I have been searching for the perfect system for the pick 3 for a while now. I have found some work better than others but they all fall short in the fact (at least in my experience) that I end up with more combinations than would be fiscally possible to actu... [ More ]

Reply #6

pacattack05 — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:32:39 GMT

sir metro........You are the fool.....Not me.........If you notice, I bring up Einstein only realative(no pun intended) to the preceedingstatement,(the thought process)and not about chaos.Here is that statement: If you think long enough about a certain problem,your brainwill make new connections, thus helping you with problem solving .And the very next line: Einstein said something similiar .Please get your facts straight, before YOU open your mouth.Thank you very much.........nah.....nah.na... [ More ]

Reply #5

four4me — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:09:37 GMT

and

Reply #4

LANTERN — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 04:16:22 GMT

Nothing at all happens just for the hell of it, not because we don't why, that that does not mean that there is no reason.It might be a physical law, or chemical or even metaphysical or supernatural or religious or spiritual or whatever you want to call it , but what-ever it might be or even a mix of, there are always reasons, the universe or creation is ordered and obeys stablished laws or set laws even if we are unaware of them, what appears to be random and or chaotic to us, it isn't so... [ More ]

Reply #3

SirMetro — Mon, 27 Jun 2005 03:00:44 GMT

Perhaps you may want to do more readings of the Mandlebrot set (sorry if I misspelled it). It explores the relationship of chaos and, if I understand the studies correctly, it is used to forecast weather patterns.In regards to your idea, keep in mind that Einstein rejected the concept of undefined events and of the idea of choas. He believed that all things can be explained thru science and math.And you are correct, Rome wasn't built in a day, but never forget, a fool is revealed when they first... [ More ]

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:26:58 GMT

RJOH....What's really amazing is how such an open minded individual like you, is part of this post to begin with.Rome wasn't built in a day, you know.

Reply #1

RJOh — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:20:22 GMT

The proof is always in the results. When you predict the results of a lottery drawing and win, you will have made your point.RJOh

chaos

pacattack05 — Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:20:47 GMT

Most people that I have talked to about patterns and trends, tell me they don't exist.It is so frustrating, to explain that I've researched alot of books on this matter, and thatjust because they have never heard most of what I have read, doesn't mean those factsdo not exist. If you toss a coin only once in your lifetime, Yes, it has a fifty-fifty chance.However, If you toss a coin 10 times, and it comes up heads 10 times in a row, whatwould you bet on the eleventh toss? I don't know of anybody... [ More ]