<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Economy filters: SHTH if you can&#x2019;t beat..</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/116664</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/116664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Economy filters: SHTH if you can&#x2019;t beat..</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/116664/416277</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/116664/416277</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:26:48 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SHTh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The following maybe of interest to 6/49 players: As a newbie to filtering I m really shocked by the large number of failures in the  width of line  and  gap s range  filters. I thought these were inoffensive, bog standard  traditional  filters. Increasing the passes of these two filters, seems to exponentially increase the number of generated combinations.  I wanted to resolve the surprisingly different failure rates of LH (2-4) and O/E (2-4) filters during my dry paper runs?!! If the theoretica... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/116664/416277">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>SHTh</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Economy filters: SHTH if you can&#x2019;t beat..</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/116664</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/116664</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:22:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>SHTh</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Economy filters: SHTH if you can t beat them   Last 8 dry paper runs have been horrendous. For each draw I was failing 5 to 7 filter criteria as opposed to the usual 1 to 3 filters. I guess we all experience bad runs so I could have stuck with this previously good filter group. But when I take into consideration that I now have to adopt a high risk strategy of prediction to enable further pool reduction and decade reduction-limiting, my chances of trapping the Jackpot are nil.  I ve decided to i... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/116664">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>SHTh</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

