<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
	<channel>
		<title>Distributions</title>
		<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021</link>
		<atom:link href="https://www.lotterypost.com/rss/topic/117021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<description>Lottery Post Forum Topic: Distributions</description>
		<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
		<generator>Lottery Post RSS Generator</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #7</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/420047</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/420047</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2005 13:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, your analysis is outstanding as usual.One of the things I was trying to suggest, is this L,M,H rating system applies to even more. If for example you take a look at the average amount of occurrences over a 23 game range, you might end up with something like this:L=0,1M=2,3,4H=5 and upIn others words, this model seems to apply to just about every filter type.The advantage of this approach is that it does require alot of complicated math, it&#x27;s a laymans approach that seems to be valid. The... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/420047">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #6</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419664</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419664</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:28:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>JKING -Breakdown of 5/39 into four programs:LLMMHA: 1 to 13B: 1 to 13C: 14 to 26D: 14 to 26E: 27 to 39Possibilities - 79,092.LLMHHA: 1 to 13B: 1 to 13C: 14 to 26D: 27 to 39E: 27 to 39Possibilities - 79,092.LMMMHA: 1 to 13B: 14 to 26C: 14 to 26D: 14 to 26E: 27 to 39Possibilities - 48,334.LMMHHA: 1 to 13B: 14 to 26C: 14 to 26D: 27 to 39E: 27 to 39Possibiliites - 79,092Total possibilities of above - 285,610, same as before.Your observations, by the way, are good and sound.One of the reasons I built... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419664">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #5</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419619</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419619</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:03:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>I would be interested in your calc&#x27;s with the new info I supplied you....thanks.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #4</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419617</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419617</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>JKING -I screwed up the calcs on the 5/39 matrix. Correction:A: 1 to 13B: 1 to 26C: 14 to 26D: 14 to 39E: 27 to 39Results: Total possibilities - 575,757, restricted possibilities - 285,610, percentage - 49.61%.Sorry about that.glj</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #3</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419616</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419616</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:58:45 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>The 5/39 distribution of L,M,H of individual lotto numbers would be as follows:L=1-13M=14-26H=27-39John please note this is a results oriented observation. I keep seeing occur in just about every filter/reduction method I use. I haven&#x27;t fomalized/quantified it. I am merely throwing it up for discussion to see if either anyone is doing anything similiar to this or is seeing the same patterns I am.</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #2</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419598</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419598</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>JKING -Doing the same analysis on a 5/54 lottery I arrive at the following:A: 1 to 18B: 1 to 36C: 19 to 36D: 19 to 54E: 37 to 54Results:Total possibilities - 3,162,510, restricted possibilities - 1,528,470, percentage - 48.34%.</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reply #1</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419447</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419447</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:05:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>johnph77</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>JKING -If I read this right, in, for instance, a 5/39 lottery, the distribution would be as follows?A: 1 to 13B: 1 to 26C: 14 to 26D: 14 to 39E: 27 to 39If so, I did the workout with the following results:There are 575,757 total possibilities in a 5/39 matrix lottery. If you restrict the possibilities to the above limits, there are 293,618 possibilities, or 51.01% of the total possibilities.Notes: I made it easy on myself by using a matrix where the number of balls drawn would be divisible by 3,... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021/419447">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>johnph77</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Distributions</title>
			<link>https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:38:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>JKING</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>After looking at a variety of filter/reduction methods, an apparent distribution pattern can be seen. For 5 numbers it goes something like this:1 to 2 numbers low value (L)1 to 3 numbers medium value (M)1 to 2 numbers high value (H)then if followsL,M,M,M,HL,M,M,H,HL,L,M,M,HL,L,M,H,HAs with all methods, there will be some actual picks that fall out of the range. But, this will be valid for the majority of the actual picks.Try it, I think you&#x27;ll see it applies probabilities, occurrences, last time... &#x5b;&#xa0;<a href="https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/117021">More</a>&#xa0;&#x5d;</p>]]></description>
			<category>JKING</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

