Lottery company control their lottery mac

Reply #21

sirbrad — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 03:34:08 GMT

Guess he learned that one off you.

Reply #20

CASH Only — Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:56:54 GMT

Why are the two choices in the poll identical

Reply #19

Chewie — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:33:59 GMT

Your points are completely irrational. There is no statement, whatsoever, limiting your posts; thoughts in that area substantiate my question. Paranoia is commonly associated with lack of sleep. Lack of sleep is associated with hearing sounds. Agree with you? Hehehehehehe. Only when Ferris Wheels rotate horizontally.

Reply #18

liuhuiguo — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:23:30 GMT

To Chewie:I sleep well, why do you ask such question, if I am not allowed to post anything, just let me know; if you don't agree with my point, that's fine, someday in the future you may agree with me

Reply #17

Chewie — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 23:19:08 GMT

Do you sleep at night, or does the alternating clicking sounds keep you awake? I heard, Aluminum foil helps with the clicking. BTW - which numbers favor the east coast of the U.S.

Reply #16

liuhuiguo — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 22:34:59 GMT

I do believe that lottery company can control their lottery balls, but in a way that does not favour anybody,they just want to distribute the lottery winner to different regions, so every region will like to play the game,otherwise if one region always win, other regions might not like to play the game which is not good for the lottery company

Reply #15

konane — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 13:40:22 GMT

If they'd pulled up past threads they'd see we've already covered it. Also might educate themselves as to pre and post drawing ball and machine tests done to assure randomness .... can probably get that information from any of the lotteries as a matter of public information.

Reply #14

sirbrad — Mon, 14 Nov 2005 09:02:11 GMT

I don't see how they benefit by allowing only certain numbers to win. It almost sounds like one big other game going on behind the scenes, and that lottery officials have nothing better to do except try to decide where they want the winner to be. Very doubtful, but if that is the case I hope they decide that my area should be the next winner. It would also be the first, thus making for a better story. No one wants to hear Oregon, or NJ won it again, boring... I also doubt the balls are controlle... [ More ]

Reply #13

bellyache — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 20:21:13 GMT

The same pointless poll and more paranoia.

Reply #12

Chewie — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:28:13 GMT

What is this obsession with a corrupt lottery? What would be the point. Money comes in , money goes out. People get paid, some get a bonus. That is how everything works, except at WalMart or in France. The states don't need to fool you to get your money, they can just write another law.

Reply #11

liuhuiguo — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:19:46 GMT

I think lottery can be fair play if the following can be realized:Let the third party to keep the lottery sales info, do not let the lottery company know what lottery combinations have been bought,lottery company is only responsible for the runing the machine to get the lottery numbers, this way, lottery company can not bias on any lottery numbers

Reply #10

liuhuiguo — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:05:56 GMT

If my thinking is correct, then I can get another conclusion: Quick pick and select your own numbers are both OK as far as nobody else bought them, this way it will maximize your chance aspossible as it can, the better way to win is to influence(or control if possible) the lottery machine to generate the numbers that you wantas possible as you can

Reply #9

dvdiva — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:02:12 GMT

I don't get the point of a poll where the answers are the same.

Reply #8

liuhuiguo — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:56:15 GMT

Perhaps not control but influence in an infinitesimal way.Influence is a force or power, it seems that the whole universe it made of power, according to Einstein, matter are energy(power), the whole university is made of energy

Reply #7

konane — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:47:25 GMT

nobody can predict the lottery numbers except that you can control it, Perhaps not control but influence in an infinitesimal way.However, although it is extremely difficult at least some of the winning numbers for a given draw can be remote viewed.

Reply #6

four4me — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:46:43 GMT

even if you could by all possible combinations there is no gaurentee that you alone would be the sole winner someone else might have also played or received the same numbers as you.

Reply #5

four4me — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:42:29 GMT

If you look at the overall numbers history of any game where 5 balls are drawn you will see correlation's between them it's a simple fact that certain numbers will be drawn more times than others. Numbers in the middle of the spread are going to be drawn more than low or high numbers for the most part. So when you say they are playing off one another you should also say they are playing off of every game which draws 5 balls. Since many of those numbers that are drawn are also like powerballs and... [ More ]

Reply #4

liuhuiguo — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:39:46 GMT

If my thinking is correct,I can get one conclusion is that: nobody can predict the lottery numbers except that you can control it,predict equals control, what we normal people can do is to try to buy lottery combinations that nobody else buy(this is very difficult because you don't know what the other people bought unless you have the sales info),when all the possible combinations have been bought, at least one will have to be chosen as the winner

Reply #3

konane — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:14:20 GMT

It's just as plausible to believe the mass mind controls which balls fall as the jackpot draw.Look at recent correlations between Mega Million and Powerball draws .... it's as if they've been playing off one another.However, lotteries already know about the phenomena which they can't control and it's called number affinities. Probably some quantum physicist will come up with a good rationalization for it.

Reply #2

liuhuiguo — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:05:23 GMT

Before the lottery machine runing, all lottery sales info has come to the hand of lottery company, they can get the list of which combination has not been bought in very short time: less than 5 minutes( I made a test: first I generate all the combination of 6/49 lottery-totally 13,983,816- into a file ie. 649.txt, then I copy 649.txt as sales.txt, then delete some lines and duplicate some lines randomly in sales.txt, then I use sort command to sort the 2 files and thenI use this command to get w... [ More ]

Reply #1

Chewie — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:50:56 GMT

I do know that lottery company has their own powerful IT department.There is no such thing as a powerful IT department. Maybe one with developers and programmers with supeior knowledge about their application. Maybe one with unlimited resources. Although, considering they operate on a budget, I doubt they have either. It is just a group of people doing what they are told, and hopefullt taking home a bonus for not screwing up the base application.You know, that paranoia only counts when the... [ More ]

Lottery company control their lottery mac

liuhuiguo — Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:16:23 GMT

I can list what lottery combination has not been bought in less than 5 minutesusing UNIX sort,diff and grep commands by comparing all 13,983,816 (for 6/49) combinations in a filewith testing files that contains all the virtual lottery sales.Let the lottery machine to drop out balls that the lottery company wants is easier trick than a little magician.There is almost one hour gap between sales close and lottery machine start working....In history there was lots of times that almost three times of... [ More ]