Arlene vs. Todd

Reply #61

pacattack05 — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:39:05 GMT

There are only five states being tracked:NY,PA,MD,MO,and VA.

Reply #60

ladyt1 — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:28:57 GMT

As I watch this posting and have to be a little biased for Todd to comeout strong, I think a straight hit for Arlene was missed in IL last nightshe had the 612 straight.

Reply #59

Rick G — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 19:49:29 GMT

Tenaj, I wasn't referring to your system or anyone else's. I was referring to quick picks vs. one's own picks.Konane, I agree and work hard every day at making my own picks instead of buying quick picks. I DO believe there is an advantage to that.However, the challenge is still ongoing and quick picks are not faring too badly and I stand by my statement.If you like her picks then buy her numbers...I'll still play my own and I'm not paying a cent for them. I don't let the state's machine pick m... [ More ]

Reply #58

four4me — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:56:32 GMT

way to go i wish i had looked at those picks a little better 851 is one of my favorites and i usually comb. it so i would have had a great day and something to cheer about. congrats on your win.

Reply #57

LANTERN — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:13:34 GMT

MDMidday Pick 3 1-5-8 Fri, Nov 25, 2005 Both of you got it straight

Reply #56

Todd — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:30:23 GMT

Powerplayer, I was saying that somewhat tounge-in-cheek. I hope you will continue to be so intellectually honest when MY picks start hitting more than HERS.

Reply #55

LOTTOMIKE — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:01:13 GMT

i've always figured you'd be able to hit more often picking your own numbers and sticking with them than getting quick picks.i have never ever gotten a quick pick for a pick 3 or pick 4 game.i have gotten a quick pick once or twice with powerball........

Reply #54

powerplayer — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:20:41 GMT

FOR ONCE I DO AGREE WITH TODD.....I MUST BE GETTING BETTER @ THIS!!!LOLPOWERPLAYER

Reply #53

Todd — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:14:31 GMT

Yup, so far I'm SHAMED, with just four box hits, to her 3 box hits and a straight.

Reply #52

powerplayer — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 05:49:23 GMT

Well I'm not positve fully since all draw results have not be computed on the prediction board but, I believe if I am correct.Arlene has just surpassed your DUBA Her #'s hit in VA and PA.Now here's some magic. PA she got boxed and VA she got straight!!Now that is a nice hit!!!!!Todd you had the # but, just not the right postionAlso I wanted to know has anyone done a overlook on all states to see how many of the QP and A's #'s have hit ???I did a brief run through and saw a bunch of hits for A's... [ More ]

Reply #51

delores247 — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:15:39 GMT

This is what i observed in the game so far One side has a DNA Factor and the other has 2 DNA factors ,this is going to be very interesting,the side with the 2 factors is going to hit like crazy,you will see after the game.goodluck.

Reply #50

konane — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:57:45 GMT

Reply #49

Tenaj — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:55:15 GMT

Congratulations Todd. WTG

Reply #48

Todd — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:53:22 GMT

I'm HOT in Missouri!! (Hit BOTH the midday and evening draws!)Clawing my way back up: as of right now, Arlene (Don) and I are even-Steven, at three box hits apiece. (I also hit Pennsylvania today.

Reply #47

Best Picks — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:42:50 GMT

Missouri 069 rng 096bx for todd.

Reply #46

Tenaj — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 01:31:53 GMT

I thought we all agreed that this thread was about Arlene vs Todd and not about anybody else's numbers. BAHi. I realize how popular you and your numbers might be, however I expect this thread to get complicated even if it stays on topic. Posting other choices is going to make it even harder to follow.So, to anyone, could we at least, please, stay on topic for this thread?truecritic____________________________________I agree with you, truecritic, no other predictor's numbers should be in this top... [ More ]

Reply #45

Blackapple — Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:56:14 GMT

852 is on my Amazing Post852 came in Pa. Day 11/24I do'nt need Arlene's numbers

Reply #44

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:40:03 GMT

Yup, I agree, I mentioned that 3 posts above.

Reply #43

Littleoldlady — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:10:55 GMT

all of the results are not in but it looks like Arlene is ahead 2 to 0. looked at NY, Penn and Maryland.

Reply #42

konane — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:08:29 GMT

I'll bring this forward from discussion in another thread .....konane Quick Picks win more often because more players choose them ....... . However, people who choose their own numbers have a higher percentage of wins because of having done research, comparisons, filtering which then gives them the best choices to play. They maximize impact of discretionary lottery dollars spent. https://www.lotterypost.com/threads.asp?tp=123448 sp=1 sq=konane sm=l si=a sf=0 sd=90 ss=dd rp=SearchSecond paragra... [ More ]

Reply #41

Tenaj — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:49:47 GMT

This thread ain't about my method. It about Arlene and Todd's challenge and the blanet statement that It would prove that quick picks are a viable way to pick your numbers. Don't be trying to make it into something else.Prove to me that choosing quick picks can generate hits everyday and several times a day with a know that I know confidence. I was just saying prove it, my mind is open and keep it simple.

Reply #40

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:49:27 GMT

So far Arlene's numbers have hit two box hits vs. my big zilch, so like I said, all the naysayers should relax. If Arlene's numbers are better than my Quick Picks, then so be it. I have a feeling it will go back and forth, but who knows? Maybe I'm wrong

Reply #39

Rick G — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 18:25:35 GMT

My explanation is very simple. Quick picks win lotteries all the time.No need to prove anything. It's a fact.If your method is better, let's see it in action.

Reply #38

truecritic — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:46:05 GMT

Reply #37

Tenaj — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:44:36 GMT

Ya'll gonna have to prove that statement to me. My mind is open to it. Make your explanations simple when the time comes. Remember I have take it to the bank mentality. The type of thinking that says, I know that I know the hit because I've seen it happen over and over. My argument is that no system is viable unless it's been proving over and over and never changes and you can take it to the bank. Otherwise you're just spitting in the wind.

Reply #36

Rick G — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:39:30 GMT

Sandy,If I wake up in the morning I'm happy that I lived through the night....That is, on the weekends and holidays. Working days are another story....lol

Reply #35

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:29:34 GMT

And also proves that buying a set of numbers is of the same value as generating Quick Picks (which are free).Therefore, if you have a choice between spending $50 on buying a set of numbers from someone, or $50 for buying more tickets, it makes more sense to spend the $50 on tickets. After all, the return on your investment pays back the same either way, so it is wiser to invest more, rather than burn it on numbers that will pay off the same.Note, I am strictly talking about buying numbers t... [ More ]

Reply #34

Sandy K — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:27:33 GMT

I really don't today is the day we should be debating this.We should all just be thankful that we are alive.

Reply #33

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:25:58 GMT

Correctomundo

Reply #32

Rick G — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:21:31 GMT

It would prove that quick picks are a viable way to pick your numbers.

Reply #31

truecritic — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:19:35 GMT

Todd...Look at it this way...suppose I went and generated my own set of 30 quick picks from the Lottery Post generator you used. And my set out performs yours and D'Arlene's. What would that prove

Reply #30

truecritic — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:47:32 GMT

Todd>truecritic, I have no idea what your beef is with running 2 comparisons at the same time. My Pick 4 random numbers are beating Don's numbers right now -- is that what you're upset about?Not upset in the slightest, just wondered if both tests were being run. You didn't bother to set up a special thread for the Pick4. Don't overlook my disclaimer - I don't advocate buying any system. I am on your side until or IF proven otherwise. >Also, a comparison of numbers like this is the most acc... [ More ]

Reply #29

MADDOG10 — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:25:28 GMT

correct, so if a duplicate number happens to appear, doesn't mean a thing..! Rng's and systems are basically built around the same principal.

Reply #28

delores247 — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:11:53 GMT

No Wars Today everyone be happy on this Holiday,Eat some Turkey and Dressing and sweets,Then exercise, get[ endorfins ]and be Happy,this is a winner

Reply #27

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:10:14 GMT

powerplayer, sorry but you're wrong. Konane is right. The RNG does not look at Don's ( Arlene's ) numbers to see what they are and then make a correction. You seem to be very troubled by this whole concept, and I'd give you the same advice that I gave to pacattack: relax. If the RNG picked some of the same numbers, then so be it. That's the way the random numbers were dealt.truecritic, I have no idea what your beef is with running 2 comparisons at the same time. My Pick 4 random numbers ar... [ More ]

Reply #26

Blackapple — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:08:16 GMT

Reply #25

konane — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:57:56 GMT

Reply #24

tntea — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:53:19 GMT

If Arlene gets upsets about Todd posting her numbers here while doing this test , that would be proof her system is a joke.She should be proud to get a month of free advertising to build up business if her method is a real money maker.

Reply #23

powerplayer — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:34:35 GMT

With out the #'s there is no system!!!So having different #'s is a equal split. If they both have the same #'s then it can't prove if her system works better then QP which would prove the lottery is not random. OOOPS!! LOL j/k Nevermind. Use what ever u want.Powerplayer

Reply #22

truecritic — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:21:16 GMT

powerplayerWould it really matter if a few are the same? If one of those wins, then D'Arlene and Todd both win. So, in effect, it is a wash (tie) - no gain for either side.

Reply #21

konane — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:12:46 GMT

An RNG is blind as far as what it generates so is subject to duplication by default of Arlene's numbers when you ask for X amount of numbers unfiltered. Correct me please if I'm wrong.

Reply #20

powerplayer — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:59:36 GMT

I have to put a word in on this. One is your wrong TODD!! Some of your quick picks are the same as her and not just same as #'s I'm talking about same order. No thank you. You need to use only qp that ARE NOT' DUPLICATES!! Other wise you winning with her #'s. I want total seperate different digits. Nothing matching!!Now that that's done the other thing is the off-shore place is not part of her system. That is your choice!! I don't want to post any kin... [ More ]

Reply #19

Sandy K — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:57:44 GMT

I agree with you, truecritic, no other predictor's numbers should be in this topic. If you have a number post it in your own topic or thread.

Reply #18

truecritic — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:54:28 GMT

BAHi. I realize how popular you and your numbers might be, however I expect this thread to get complicated even if it stays on topic. Posting other choices is going to make it even harder to follow.So, to anyone, could we at least, please, stay on topic for this thread

Reply #17

Winner2Be — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:51:01 GMT

Don't sweat the small stuff...

Reply #16

Blackapple — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:44:56 GMT

Arlene's 30 picks are: 089 158 508 871 025 789 832 787 818. The Lottery Post Quick Picks Generator selected the following 30 numbers (drum-roll please): 287 858 250 089 158 My Amazing post has thesekey digits 8 7, yet to hit arethe above,one should hit by11/2585**--84*--- 89-Waiting for some actionIf her combos hit my pairsby 11/25. She might be worthyof my attention otherwiseI 'm doing fine.

Reply #15

truecritic — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 14:42:58 GMT

ToddAre you doing ONLY the Pick3 challenge now? Forget about the Pick4 that dman started tracking in the other thread? Also, by doing it your way, no matter how much fun it is, you are not comparing apples to apples.1) If you are going to play 5 different States, I see no way other than using an internet account to place the bets. Therefore, the payoffs have to be based on the $900/$1.However, if D'Arlene's system requires that, I'd never buy it anyway. I am interested in 1 State, Michigan. 2... [ More ]

Reply #14

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:42:01 GMT

Pacattack, thank you for your input, duly noted. Now I will get on with the challenge, which I'm sure everyone else will be interested to see the results of. Sorry the terms of the challenge do not meet your specifications, but you can start your own challenge if you don't like mine. However, you should note that I have a bit of experience in the area of objective comparisons with regard to lotteries, and the computer system that I developed (the predictions board) is the most fair compariso... [ More ]

Reply #13

pacattack05 — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:34:02 GMT

What excuses? Those are the conditions.The word sound can only manifest itself to reality, only when 3 components are present:1: The maker of the vibration.2: A medium for the vibration to travel through.3: A receiver to pick up those vibrations. (ears).Once all three criteria are met, then it's called sound.If you take anyone of those 3 away, it won't be complete.Don't worry about clutter. I'm done with this subject.Have fun....

Reply #12

Saleo Paleo — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:32:35 GMT

I do my playing from the states ,I have contacts that play for me,I do not play from the wrong side of the fence,but I do check them out from the off-shore view.

Reply #11

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:29:29 GMT

Pacattack, I'm not going to allow you to derail my fun challenge, so if you want to keep posting excuses, I'll move them over to the other thread, where you can clutter things up all you want.

Reply #10

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:27:09 GMT

Oh please, the excuses are starting already. Just sit back and relax already.I'm not claiming I have a system, I'm saying that 30 Quick Picks are just as good as her numbers. So I'm comparing 30 Quick Picks to her 30 numbers in all of her hot states .You really need to relax.By the way, it's not your challenge, it's mine.

Reply #9

Saleo Paleo — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 13:22:02 GMT

I'm sure yours will do as good or better than Arlenes,I have had a daily check of her#'s for almost the last 2 months and it is no better than any of the posters on the forum,I would not play any of the #'s until I saw how worthwhile they were,therfore I haven't played any because when I did this I saw that in my opinion you would not be any richer but probley much poorer.

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:57:55 GMT

Not only did you give the numbers away, you also gave the states.The problem, again with this test is that you're also using her states, when you should be using your own. Those states is a part of a whole to her system. In order for you to compare systems, you should pick your own states as a part of a whole to your system.The other problem is that there is another part of a whole to her system, which includes playing those numbers in the off-shore, which she says makes the most amount of retur... [ More ]

Reply #7

delores247 — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:52:09 GMT

Todd this is going to be a good one,because both of you got some hot hot hot numbers-goodluck to the both of you

Reply #6

OldTurkey — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:47:23 GMT

It happens every year. HA

Reply #5

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:45:46 GMT

Your username seems appropriate today! Happy Thanksgiving

Reply #4

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:45:08 GMT

Somehow I'm managing to keep calm. Don't worry, you can't copyright a set of numbers. Chill out.

Reply #3

OldTurkey — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:44:13 GMT

Thanks Todd. I will follow this closely.OT

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:41:25 GMT

You just gave her numbers away for the whole world to see. I will not be held responsible for this, and it's recorded here as proof. Thank God.I don't need legal matters perching over my shoulders.

Reply #1

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:37:16 GMT

Made more sense to post this in the Pick 3 forum.

Arlene vs. Todd

Todd — Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:09:14 GMT

Sorry, I just had to laugh when I created that subject line -- Arlene vs. Todd . It sounds too funny for words. This is not even Arlene vs. Todd, it's more like Arlene vs. the Quick Picks , but that doesn't sound as dire and important. Anyway, this is the challenge that was setup in the other thread, which seemed to go on forever, page after page. https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123114.htmThe challenge is that I offered to compare the hit ratio and prize ratio of Lottery Post's Quick Pic... [ More ]