"A" vs. LP Quick Pick Generator -- Final Wrap-Up

Reply #23

lottaloot — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 21:08:55 GMT

I would like to join your class, if you ever start one up.

Reply #22

LANTERN — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:30:40 GMT

Yes, Pauline and on Sunday evening or sometime on Monday I will start another pick 3 filter tutorial, that is I will show people some filters that they can use on the pick 3 and pick 4.I will give a list of many filters both baxed and straight, but it will very much be up to people how they will use them if they do.I might show how I would use some of them with examples, might even do like TNTEA and try to start some kind of filter class, I am not very sure yet.

Reply #21

bellyache — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:14:07 GMT

So you helped with the filters on LP Lantern? Cool

Reply #20

WIN D — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 14:24:05 GMT

Please join in on theSystems Forum Lantern. Throw in some ideas putting together a good filters method for STRAIGHTS up there. We need it for individual states .....and for all states too. Need your help .....

Reply #19

LANTERN — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 05:09:39 GMT

I must have done something wrong, I didn't mean for all those spaces to be there.Nowdays I am very interested in all kinds of lottery skips, ranges and statistics.

Reply #18

LANTERN — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:45:29 GMT

ToddThank you very much for that, I do have an understanding of filters development, but I would never call myself as you did.I said, that I would not again help anybody with developing any more filter workouts or programs, but I will change my mind in your case.If you again need help on developing any more filters just let me know, as I have some more.Even if I don't play the lottery, I keep on developing more filters every so often, but the right statistics are also of course very very importa... [ More ]

Reply #17

Todd — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:25:24 GMT

By the way, Lantern, thanks again for all your help and advice when I needed it to develop the filters available on Lottery Post.In case anyone is not aware, Lantern is a filter genious, and was instrumental in developing what is here.

Reply #16

LANTERN — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:18:37 GMT

Yes, Todd, at least for me it is a harmless hobby as I don't spend money on tickets, not very often anyway. No money won, but no money lost either.Maybe one day.

Reply #15

lottaloot — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:14:01 GMT

Ahhhhh... The male ego at its finest I do, however, agree with Todd---The proof is in the pudding

Reply #14

Todd — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 04:00:35 GMT

That's a good reason why it's important to test over several days, not just a few (or one).This challenge was a great example of that. Remember after the first day it started, and pacattack and dman start shouting from the rooftops about how great Arlene's numbers were -- all of the sudden confident in victory after starting off complaining about how unfair the challenge was? Just think if the test was only one day long, and people didn't have the ability to see how skewed that one day wa... [ More ]

Reply #13

Todd — Fri, 02 Dec 2005 03:56:21 GMT

Yes, I know you had sour grapes from the beginning, pacattack. But you're obviously not an expert on objective comparisons, because everything you're saying is just wrong.Saying that a better comparison would be to use different states is just plain wacky.Also, I know that as soon as I posted details of the challenge, you started immediately making excuses for Arlene , even though nothing had taken place at that point. I know you were scared to see her numbers shamed (which they were).Particu... [ More ]

Reply #12

pacattack05 — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:39:13 GMT

In my opinion the challenge was just for fun, and not the reality to Arlene's system. The 30 numbers were never to be played all the time, every day.It's clearly stated that you should start with either the regular, or top five picks, and work up your way to playing more, or certain groups, depending on the circumstances.If it sounds as though I'm saying this after the fact, just do a search and you'll see me writing about this long before this challenge .Doubles are not to be played unless cer... [ More ]

Reply #11

MrBobb — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 21:21:08 GMT

Reply #10

LANTERN — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:56:48 GMT

Is incredible, I think that it is against statistics, but for the last few days those 5 states and maybe most of the others also have been avoiding that particular group of 30 combos as if they were the plague or had it.It might have been a good thing that I finished the test early, I was right that no more hits would come, I am by now very aware of the state lotteries' Modus Operandi .

Reply #9

LANTERN — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 19:29:10 GMT

My own private 7 days test with my own 30 numbers started on 25 Nov and would had ended tonight with the night draws, but I abandoned it a few days early, I think.I have not counted to see how many hits it would already have up to this point, but I think that even without any of today's possible hits if any, it might already have had more than 13 or maybe even more than 16 hits, since the hits would all have been played just boxed, I only count them as boxed, even whatever straight hits I might... [ More ]

Reply #8

bellyache — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:28:05 GMT

Most seasoned lottery players at Lottery Post will tell you that same fact, that there is no substitute for hard work when it comes to picking numbers, and the best results are achieved through your own systems and analysis, not through the magic bullet theory that these numbers newsletters throw at you. ITA with this! I have my own system that I use for picking numbers and although it needs some work, I'd rather do the work to come up with something that can work for me then pay someone els... [ More ]

Reply #7

MrBobb — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 18:02:55 GMT

Todd said: I'm very happy to see the particular quotes you picked up on. Those are key points. Thanks! Those are indeed key points and more lottery players would be wise to take them to heart. Their time and money would be better spent on using the tools available to Lottery Post Premium Members. There are many people at Lottery Post who have developed tremendous spreadsheets and workouts. They spend a good deal of time thinking about their workouts and testing new theories. These are the pe... [ More ]

Reply #6

Todd — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:33:05 GMT

MrBobb,I'm very happy to see the particular quotes you picked up on. Those are key points.There are many people at Lottery Post who have developed tremendous spreadsheets and workouts. They spend a good deal of time thinking about their workouts and testing new theories. These are the people who tend to do the best in the predictions statistics pages. The stats don't lie!For example, check out how well Sandy K is doing, with $90,755 wagered, and a $106,340 payout this month! And that's usin... [ More ]

Reply #5

MrBobb — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:21:58 GMT

Todd said: Most seasoned lottery players at Lottery Post will tell you that same fact, that there is no substitute for hard work when it comes to picking numbers, and the best results are achieved through your own systems and analysis, not through the magic bullet theory that these numbers newsletters throw at you. This needs to be repeated often. Too many people are tempted by dreams of quick and easy winnings - just give me the winning numbers, they'll say.I've won more money by using m... [ More ]

Reply #4

RJOh — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:20:10 GMT

I think the LP RNG is a good way to test any system weather it's your own or one you purchased. It hard to beat a good RNG and if a system can't beat it, it's worthless because any system that is designed intelligently should be able to do better than a system with no intelligences. A lot of system out there were given a lot of thought but they lack any intelligences in their design.

Reply #3

Todd — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:09:45 GMT

* Laughs harder than you *You obviously are so blinded by the hypnosis that don has put you under that you didn't take the time to research your post.Take, for example, your comment about how can I possibly win more than once in Maryland on the same date? *Still laughing* Well, because the Lottery Post Quick Picks Generator provided both 6-4-2 and 4-2-6, and the results on that date were 4-2-6.So, I think it's time to start looking in the mirror and see what's going on within yourself. Stop... [ More ]

Reply #2

dman2005 — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 17:01:28 GMT

Laughs..so much for forbidden, eh?? PS: Under Todd's section notice that he counts more then 1 box win when he gets 1..ie. nov 29th..he counted 2 box wins for PA...and on nov 30th he counts MD as 2 box wins...You can only count 1 box per state or straight/box for a state...when playing online it makes no differeence in how the box appeared..6 ways 24 ways etc..it all pays the same..but you can only count a box 1 x...

Reply #1

CalifDude — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:58:30 GMT

I was confident that this test would prove what I have said for a long time. When someone asks me how to win at Pick 3 (and I get the question often), I tell them to use my Playing Card method. Take out the face cards, shuffle well, and deal out sets of 3 cards. The Ace is 1 and the rest are their face value. There have been a couple of people that have tried it and posted their numbers (I think to prove me wrong!) and they had winning numbers! Right now I'm spending most of the day and n... [ More ]

"A" vs. LP Quick Pick Generator -- Final Wrap-Up

Todd — Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:17:01 GMT

Here are the final results of the challenge in the topic located at https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/123472.htm.Even though the topic of Arlene (don) is forever closed at Lottery Post, I am presenting these results to show definitively what a crock it is to just get a bunch of numbers from someone, as opposed to getting a system that can generate your OWN numbers.To the small minority of people who are tempted to post a bunch of BS heated posts about this, don't bother. If you have to go in... [ More ]