A Better Method for Pick3

Reply #76

Todd — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:16:59 GMT

At least one thing is certain: we can always count on Rick G to bring things back into perspective!Laverne, I certainly understand, especially now that you've explained it, that you're upset by that Blog entry. All I was saying was that I personally did not see where it went overboard, but I suppose I have a pretty thick skin after doing this for 6 years now.Tenaj, I know I can always count on you to see the distinction between disagreements between friends and true spitefulness, which is why I... [ More ]

Reply #75

pacattack05 — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:04:57 GMT

I like the way you think.

Reply #74

pacattack05 — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:51:12 GMT

Tenaj, Laverne, and Tntea, Please realize that I'm only goofing around just to lighten things up a little. Please don't take my jokes personally. Not that anyone has complained, but thought it was important to mention.Now let's not fight about top billing in the list above. It was in no particular order okay....I hope I didn't start a new war. LOL

Reply #73

Rick G — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:48:51 GMT

I just look at the prediction pages posters and their results and stats to determine who is better . It is all there (and filterable) for anyone to consider. Why is this such a mystery? Is the forum or a blog entry a better place to prove our point than the prediction board stats? I think not.

Reply #72

LAVERNE MALONEY — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:43:48 GMT

Thank you Clairvoyance for your good words. It means alot to me.

Reply #71

time*treat — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:38:25 GMT

Just wait till BuzzsawAnn sees what happened to her thread while she wasn't looking...

Reply #70

emilyg — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:54:05 GMT

did i hear scratch? got kitty's attention. behind the ears, please.

Reply #69

pacattack05 — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:44:56 GMT

Are those cheeks good in all states? And how long are they good for ? a week? Month? Or scratch for one day

Reply #68

Zoozie — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:40:07 GMT

time*treatDo the high and low method and/or horizontal or vertical positioning

Reply #67

Tenaj — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:34:13 GMT

That's exactly what I thought when I first came to LP and people where fighting with Tntea about the excessive posting of V-Tracs. My reply was when I came to LP I didn't know I would be entertained as well. But it ain't funny now.

Reply #66

Clairvoyance — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:32:06 GMT

Ok You Two, Since I am a peacemaker in this earthy life, I have a suggestion and please only take it as advice for someone who has experience with this type of situation because I have gone though this same scenario as being a natural healer and finding a cure for a disease. Again this is only my personal wisdom on this though experience: Tntea, You are good at what you do and I have looked at the v-track system and you are right the numbers do come up and I have seen it happen many times! Altho... [ More ]

Reply #65

time*treat — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:29:09 GMT

Would that be hand/cheek same side or hand/cheek opposite sides? More drama here than daytime soaps... and interactive too.

Reply #64

LAVERNE MALONEY — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:53:39 GMT

When I saw the blog that was written by tntea I was shocked that she had to go to such great lengths to speak against my doubles methods in her blog: vtracs center.I had no recent exchange of conversation with her. When tntea first came to the Lottery Post on June 30,2004 soon after she asked me how I tracked the doubles. I explained it to her, she even sent me private messages. I gave her many many examples. Tntea said that she just could not understand my States Dates method.These were cordi... [ More ]

Reply #63

Tenaj — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:00:08 GMT

Laverne certainly was crushed and called Tntea out on the new pick3 system thread and asked Tntea to take it back. I know you are not picking on me because I can take constructive criticism and hold accountability for my actions. You have been most helpful in many endeavors I've had here on LP and I'm grateful. I have more respect for you to suck up to you, so you can talk my words as sincere.Tntea repeatedly mentioned Laverne's system as a losing system. It was construed as insulting, not... [ More ]

Reply #62

Zoozie — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:29:18 GMT

What happened to actually staying on the topic of the thread? Buzz Ann started this with a phi method and we got WAY OFF TRACK...............Some can scratch their ass and see numbers to play - does that mean his/her method doesn't work or that they should tell everyone to scratch?We've got the vtrac info for people to learn, we've got the MY Sparking Gems info for people to learn plus all the other methods/systems people has come up with on here. Who is to say what is wrong or right. Befor... [ More ]

Reply #61

emilyg — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:24:20 GMT

when i read it - i felt bad for laverne.

Reply #60

truecritic — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:20:19 GMT

This Math Forum lags way behind (165 topics) all the others. How about adding Vtracs to this forum? Make it so any post that has the word vtacs, automatically gets refused from other forums.Just an idea. I am not against reading about all systems.

Reply #59

Todd — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:19:11 GMT

Gee, you know I just don't see how that Blog entry is trashing another member's system. Even if I were Laverne reading that entry, I honestly would not feel trashed.To me, that Blog entry is a commentary on how tntea came to use her current method. It seems pretty straightforward, and I just don't see the passive-aggressivenes.I'm not going to invalidate your feelings on this, because I know that two people can read something completely differently.I just don't see where tntea is coming onto... [ More ]

Reply #58

pacattack05 — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:18:55 GMT

Cat fights won't help. Learn to love one another.

Reply #57

Tenaj — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:09:30 GMT

You are right, she doesn't result to name calling, it's passive agressive. Did you read What observation will do in her blog? It's not naming calling, but it's trashing another member's system who has never uttered a word againist her or V-Tracs. That's what a lot of this is about. I say, if you can dish it out you should be able to take it.

Reply #56

Todd — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:38:23 GMT

I personally think this gets waaaaaay too carried away with people jumping on tntea about Vtracs. It's a method that appears to be pretty well thought-out, and tntea obviously enjoys using it (as do numerous other people), and I don't see tntea going around name-calling people who don't use Vtracs, so why do that to tntea?Plus, I think you all need to read tntea's post above again. She is defending her system without resorting to name-calling or getting overly defensive.(I'm sure the fact that... [ More ]

Reply #55

Amazing Grace — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:04:12 GMT

I may have got some names mixed up above but what the H I do the same with Numbers.All systems have merit.Including the person that uses no system.

Reply #54

Amazing Grace — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:59:46 GMT

V-tracs workThey work wellBut just like any other method its how much work you put into itNobody has the perfect methodBut when you can predict more accurately you can win more oftenits all about increaseing your oddsWith no method or data tracking your chances are 1 in 1000 on pick 3 with data tracking your odds can be as low as 1 in 10I have seen first hand v-tracs at work goes great with Sum and Root sum it becomes a process of elimination.Tenta follows her numbers well She told me to watch f... [ More ]

Reply #53

Bluegrass — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:22:40 GMT

Reply #52

Tenaj — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:08:45 GMT

tntea,I got a nice fat hit on 717 tonight and I'm not going to let this crap spoil my win!!!!!If there were a moon emoticon I would give it to you. But take this

Reply #51

tntea — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:35:17 GMT

Tenaj, you are most certainly right, Vtracs will not work for everyone. It really depends on how much time you put into it. I am terribly sorry it didn't work for those people. I gave it by best shot. It is fortunately working for me. If it stops.. then the ride has been great.. But since there is only so many vtracs to know, and so little numbers to choose from, how could it...? I agree with you on trying different methods... and finding with winning and losing and learning more as you lo... [ More ]

Reply #50

tntea — Wed, 25 Jan 2006 05:20:58 GMT

Sandy, First I am not bragging... I am just showing people the vtracs do work. If one doesn't like the method fine.. They can use whatever works for them. I just recently found out that one could just get a subscription for vtracs and let them send you the number. I had rather pick them myself.. win or lose.. at least I played apart on where my money goes without having to pay someone to do that for me.. Second, I have posted the wins.. what do you mean back it up..?The strings in vtracs are... [ More ]

Reply #49

truecritic — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:57:33 GMT

Sandy KActually, I believe YOU made $101,000

Reply #48

Sandy K — Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:02:19 GMT

Cybero,TnTea SAYS she wins....but does she copy and paste much here of her winnings......lol...hey I made a profit of $100,000 bucks this year.......lol.......believe me also?????I am not knocking vtracs......they just don't work without using a large string...and tntea will admit that she boxes almost everything and if she played that string straight and box, she may win but not the amounts she is talking about (I could be wrong......maybe I am wrong but I don't think so)......she needs to play... [ More ]

Reply #47

tntea — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:03:22 GMT

Sounds interesting.. Looking forward to your results..Thanks..

Reply #46

truecritic — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:54:09 GMT

Paurths,I know the value of having large amounts of data to work with. Similar to RJoh, I too used to dabble with BASIC and dedicated programs - never needed a spreadsheet. I admire all of the people on here that are programming spreadsheets.The new method you mention sounds very exciting. Hope it goes as expected and I, for one, will be watching for it.

Reply #45

paurths — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:43:27 GMT

Yes, state by state.Ofcourse the drawdata can be approached in many different ways, also multistate-wise. (but then the date will be the most important factor, also difference between midday and evening)I've read plenty on sister-states etc. Well, i have not found one yet! Numbers travel, sure, but where they will popup the following day/draw? No clue there.One thing that seems to work now and then is using the hot pairs from midday draws for the evening draws. But then again, this also fails... [ More ]

Reply #44

truecritic — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:25:53 GMT

PaurthsI thought you had the entire database as one giant 87,000 - didn't realize it was State by State - a little thought on my end should have figured it was State by State. No, certainly nothing to do with errors.

Reply #43

paurths — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:17:12 GMT

Hi truecritic,what you mean, the opoosite of what i thought ?I've setup the database in a relational design. Pretty basic and to the point. States, and states have draws, pure and simple.I have lots of other tables setup in it (which i will not discuss here)Don't worry, i'm not some lunatic that will go crazy when someone points me towards an error in my code or so. It was just data that was requested, that's all, and i happened to have that data, nothing more than that.Here's a view of the mir... [ More ]

Reply #42

truecritic — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:46:40 GMT

PaurthsI see, you have your database setup the opposite of what I thought.It's nothing critical...you've done a massive amount of work already. My experiences simply showed that you can't necessarily count on predicting with results of that type.

Reply #41

CARBOB — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:44:40 GMT

Paurths, If the code is correct, then the results show ,what I was believing to be the case. I think the mirrors and totals of the gems bring the gems more than one combo. As lottaloot stated you are very good . Thanks, very good info. BTW, pm me with the name of the book, please.Bob

Reply #40

paurths — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:41:27 GMT

Hi Kimberlee,thanx, but not a genius at all. Just another guy trying to find a way, or the way, to get some sure hits.Oops, don't remember about any book... are you sure that came from me? (not that i doubt your memory, but i sure have doubts about mine! ;-)G'sRicky

Reply #39

paurths — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:41:46 GMT

Hi truecritic,the counting is done within one state at a time.State AIf it finds a gem$, it will gather the 7 draws prior to that gem and start counting each number.Then it moves on to the next gem it finds.Then it moves to state BIf it finds a gem$, it will gather the 7 draws prior to that gem and start counting each number.Then it moves on to the next gem it finds.and so on...so yes, surely there will be states among this that have a totally different pattern.lol i don't have the energy or tim... [ More ]

Reply #38

truecritic — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:54:36 GMT

PaurthsFrom a purely scientific angle, I would bet that the results would be different if you divided your database in half. Or by each individual State. Each half or State would have its own set of 20 numbers with only a few overlapping.Things I have checked that are similar have shown me that one week a certain number will predict the outcome but the next week, it is something else that predicts the outcome. Therefore not much can be drawn from the results because of a lack of consistenc... [ More ]

Reply #37

lottaloot — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:24:24 GMT

Paurths, you are a genius I wish I knew how to write code like that. (Thinking about going back to school to learn how) BTW: I got that book you told me about. Now I want more books WTG:Laverne

Reply #36

paurths — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:36:13 GMT

I just looked at a visual of this , and the last thing i wrote is not exactly true, that about 1 in 3 times on of the gems will follow.It happens a lot that two or more of the mirrors totals fall together within 7 draws, before a gem$, so the count is still valid, but the 1 in 3 odds are not correct. In fact, i think it rather goes to 1 in 8 or something... i will have to check my code again for this counter.Also i noticed that it works some periods, then nothing comes at all.They also like t... [ More ]

Reply #35

paurths — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:13:25 GMT

Here you go Bob,Test for 7 draws before Nbr falls.Nbr: 334Total hits: 279Mirror: 889: 6 timesTotal 665: 5 timesNbr:344Total hits: 265Mirror 899: 4 timesTotal 556: 6 timesNbr:335Total hits: 258Mirror 880: 0 timesTotal 466: 9 timesNbr:355Total hits: 253Mirror 800: 3 timesTotal 446: 7 timesNbr:337Total hits: 265Mirror 882: 9 timesTotal 662: 0 timesNbr:377Total hits: 289Mirror 822: 7 timesTotal 622: 6 timesNbr:339Total hits: 246Mirror 884: 4 timesTotal 660: 3 timesNbr:399Total hits: 272Mirror 844: 1... [ More ]

Reply #34

CARBOB — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:47:22 GMT

Paurths, I just wanted to know how many times each of the mirrors and totals preceded the gem draws.Thanks, BobGEMMIRRORTOTAL334889665335880664339884660337882662344899655355800644377822622399844600

Reply #33

paurths — Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:26:20 GMT

Hi Bob,you mean in stead of 334/344 --> 889/899?And what exactly do you mean with totals of the gems?G'sRicky

Reply #32

CARBOB — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:53:17 GMT

Paurths, Thanks, another request, will you do the tests with just the mirrors and one for the totals of the Gems ?Bob

Reply #31

paurths — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:19:19 GMT

Hi Laverne,it takes forever to load the page when i add a new post with all them tables...

Reply #30

paurths — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:17:30 GMT

Since i'm at it, these are the best 20 picks that fall the draw before any of the gem$Still boxed count.NbrHits0192212421257204572006819047191351901818359184671825917078170261668916158163671616716127161251637816 The story changes when i count only the straights, Bob.Here are the best 20 that fall within a timelimit of 7 days prior to a gem$hit. Notice the 555 in 4th place!!!NbrHits9193245329211275552756126503263402628125741257742568825876256812502625158253842508925447256442577525 These are the... [ More ]

Reply #29

LAVERNE MALONEY — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:11:38 GMT

I would like to piggy back on what CARBOB stated adding could you put the info in my post Trigger Doubles, (here is the link) https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/126450.htmbecause it is related to the gem$ very important. I want to try to keep all of the discussion for the most part in one location for easier access. Thanks.

Reply #28

paurths — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:06:12 GMT

Hi Bob,these are the statesStateAZ Pick 3 (E)CA (M)CA Daily3 (E)DE play3 (E)FL cash3 (E)GA Cash3 (E)GA midday3 (M)ID (E)IL Daily 3 (E)IL Midday 3 (M)IN (E)IN (M)MI Daily 3 (E)MI Daily 3 (M)MO (E)MO (M)NJ Midday 3 (M)NJ Pick 3 (E)NY Midday 3 (M)NY Numbers (E)OH midday3 (M)OH Pick3 (E)PA Daily number 3 (E)PA Midday 3 (M)SC Midday 3 (M)SC Pick 3 (E)TN Cash 3 (E)Tri State (E)Tri State (M)TX P3 (E)VA (E)VA Midday 3 (M)WC Pick 3 (E) Notice that Indiana is also in there. Perhaps their rng messed up the... [ More ]

Reply #27

paurths — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:05:17 GMT

Numbers that fell the draw before a double (any double, the test included all 90 doubles)NbrHits568178569174134172068170018164049163279163014162458161012161124161239160137160678159167159178159789159138158456157067157

Reply #26

CARBOB — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:59:12 GMT

Paurths, Will you please list the states you used for your test. Thanks for doing this, very kind of you. Do you think the results would change very much using straights? WinD, where are you, give us some percentages.Bob

Reply #25

paurths — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:57:44 GMT

I tested also to see if other doubles come alot before any of the gems.334/344NbrHits1992011219007183391811717116176881700117344163881633816066152291545514667144771402214155146691427714 335/355NbrHits4472246621233183391819918115164771611715266150061468814288144481400714077131181367713033130551358813 339/399NbrHits2242244621114181551713316099164771525515044155771433914445140031429914005143771419914337148991311213 337/377NbrHits4472211220116204461922819113180091824417299172241711517199171881701116... [ More ]

Reply #24

paurths — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:34:07 GMT

What comes out before gem$ ....I tested this on 33 states, total draws: 87594 (i'm sure i don't have all of them, but still, 87000 is a pretty big number and should give data that is the average)The code loops through one state at a time. Whenever it finds any of these numbers, it will gather the 7 previous numbers.********************************Numbers tested: 337,377,339,399,335,355,334,443Total times these numbers hit: 2099Result (best 20, counted boxed)NbrHits0268706885034814577901975458751... [ More ]

Reply #23

Tenaj — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:38:48 GMT

Thanks Paruths, and just to think I did it with pencil and paper for 11 years.

Reply #22

paurths — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:09:45 GMT

I had vtracs down, but lately i can't get a hit with it even if a vtrac fell on my head...I've also been watching those gems, along with 976. Well, more than often no gem will show up after 421 or 976. And sometimes it does.I used 33 states to track them, with a visual of all the draws for the last year, and the gems and both the other numbers with yellow background. It is a very colorfull screen, b/c they hit like crazy that's for sure. But where and when, to tell before the hit? I really don't... [ More ]

Reply #21

Tenaj — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:01:31 GMT

We have to find our own niche. What works for some does not work for others. I hope that everyone find that niche and win.

Reply #20

Amazing Grace — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:06:37 GMT

V-tracs also work well for me I never paid that much attention to them until i learned more.They work fine.

Reply #19

Amazing Grace — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:59:44 GMT

Tenaj Knows her numbers game well. WC the other day she tells me to watch for 835 it hit the next day she also told me to watch for 976 repeating and it hit the next day after 835, This lady Knows her Numbers.As far as LM goes I am finding similar results. It comes from study study study. Keep up the good work the optimist will win more thanks to both of your postings.

Reply #18

inittowin — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:45:16 GMT

The thing that strikes me funny is that you both fight each others battles, for each other. What the **** is up with that? LM and tenaj congratulate each other like dman and gloria777 did

Reply #17

LAVERNE MALONEY — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:42:35 GMT

inittowin writes: You never predict any specific state before it hits, only after the drawing. inittowin, never make a blanket statement without first doing your research thoroughly. Here is a link in which Tenaj makes a Florida prediction (state specific) I am so happy to report that it was a winner !$!$. Scroll down about 6 posts on the 1st page. https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/120239.htm

Reply #16

Tarzan — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:33:16 GMT

moon is in Cancer,emotions running high,just take it easy folks.Can't we just all get along

Reply #15

Tenaj — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:29:13 GMT

Oh please. This is about constanting shoving a system down people throats and saying don't use this LP member's system because you will lose. I hit for $1,800 tonight on 142 in SC tonight. One of my pet states. Read the Gems Alert thread. Two $1 straight hits and it's because I've seen what travels with 967 over and over and over and that's why I can take it to the Bank. Many other numbers I know with the same vibrations. You wanna hit 555, play it after 322 falls exactly in any state.... [ More ]

Reply #14

inittowin — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:47:23 GMT

It sure seems that it's OK for you to shove the gems down peoples throat. I personally think that's the biggest joke going. You act like anytime a double number hits, you knew it was coming. HA! You never predict any specific state before it hits, only after the drawing. Most everyone on this site can do that!It appears you have a problem with anyone that can win often........................let's see...hmmm........Casho and now tntea.You're posts are some of the most negative posts on this... [ More ]

Reply #13

cybero — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:37:45 GMT

So Tenaj,What is your stats and winnings so far in 2006? TNTEA obviously knows what's up from the looks of her winnings. I can personally say VTracs work............many others systems do not seem to produce the results that I have learned from TNTEA and studying VTracs. I just thought someone needs to stand up for TNTEA...seems alot of folks around here like to step on her every chance they get! Nuff Said.... CyberOcybero@gmail.com

Reply #12

Tenaj — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:29:25 GMT

Vtrac does not work for everybody, just like other systems don't work for everybody. I've heard people say it over and over, Vtracs did not work for me. But I congratulate those who have been successful with it.We are all individuals and have the right to find our own niche without someone campaigning one system. Swearing that it is the best and you will lose if you use other systems. So quit shoving it down everybody's throats. What is this a forum or a campaign to convert everybody to Vtra... [ More ]

Reply #11

tntea — Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:51:37 GMT

The method does seem too easy.. and too good to be true. I have not back tested in states using it, been busy with the vtracs. I do agree with you the Phi is a hell of a lot easier than vtracs was in the beginning..Now that the charts are made.. it is a matter of looking to see the last draw.. but you have to do that with any system I suppose..As for being here after vtracs is forgotten.. The vtracs will never be forgotten.. I am passing this winning system down to my children, and their chil... [ More ]

Reply #10

Amazing Grace — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 03:18:49 GMT

V-tracs,Root sums,Sums,Key numbers, Thats where its at good hard facts.Phi. Start predicting some numbers and we will see how it works, go ahead take the next step.Seeing is Believing.

Reply #9

truecritic — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:41:22 GMT

BuzzsawAnnVtracs is designed to help with the lottery. Phi has no such design. Previous posters have found no particular correlation between Phi and the lottery. If you have found such a secret, could you demonstrate with data? Something that warrants further investigation of Phi.A one month workout, perhaps

Reply #8

BuzzsawAnn — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:24:22 GMT

Well it shows up in the universe in the most remarkable ways and I guess we will just have to see. I think is better than the vtracs and a heck of a lot easier. Phi was here before Vtracs and will be here when Vtracs is long forgetten.

Reply #7

cadl — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:21:55 GMT

i tried this a couple of years ago in texas--backtesting with Phi (1.618) and phi(0.618)--and found no evidence of a success rate which could create a positive cashflow; tried with day only, nite only and combined draws--no luck

Reply #6

truecritic — Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:10:32 GMT

>A better method for pick three is to use PhiBetter than what? Easier than what? Could you provide some data to back up your statements

Reply #5

Amazing Grace — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:56:24 GMT

Back testing in my state did not prove worthy. Some hits but seldom.I like the challenge of tracking.The process of Elimination.The law of averagesThe good system postsThats where its at.No such thing as instant Gratification Have to work at it.

Reply #4

Amazing Grace — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:02:00 GMT

Here comes the back testing.Thanks

Reply #3

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:30:57 GMT

I went back did your example 262x1.61803 I got: 423.92386.After the decimal point that is where the difference happens.

Reply #2

LAVERNE MALONEY — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:25:25 GMT

Hello there BuzzsawAnn, that is a nifty calculation. Thank you.I just tried it using 377 that hit last night in IL. the MD midday hit was right in there, 997.Here is the calculation in action:377x1.61803=609.99731WOW

Reply #1

Tenaj — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:08:01 GMT

I've tried the Fibonacci numbers before. Getting the complete set was problematic and I must say it came up with some hits.

A Better Method for Pick3

BuzzsawAnn — Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:52:46 GMT

A better metho for pick three is to use PhiPhi ( ), is simply an irrational number like pi (p), but one with many unusual mathematical properties. Phi to the first 15 places is 1.618033988749895. What makes it more unusual is that it can be derived in many ways and shows up in relationships throughout the universe. Take your Pick 3 choice and multiply it by Phi. Then use the three digits in the various lotteries. What could be better or easier? Think of the time you would save ?Example-- 262... [ More ]