PI method

Reply #94

cps10 — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 14:17:39 GMT

This Pi Method has some merit. Check out my posts on Pi Revisited:

Pi Revisited

Reply #93

pacattack05 — Wed, 05 Apr 2006 05:08:29 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by golfnut on April 4, 2006 Dear Pacattack:

On your PI and 666 system, how do you arrive at 9-7-7 from 741.477707. I must be missing something. You mention, See 9-7-7 5 days later, and I am suppose to extract 9-7-7 from 741.477707? Then I am suppose to extract 5-4-0 from 740.203822 3 days later? Need more clarification.

The point made in that statement of mine wasn't so much to get all three right, but it seemed to get the last two positions correctly. So... [ More ]

Reply #92

golfnut — Tue, 04 Apr 2006 12:40:08 GMT

Dear Pacattack:

On your PI and 666 system, how do you arrive at 9-7-7 from 741.477707. I must be missing something. You mention, See 9-7-7 5 days later, and I am suppose to extract 9-7-7 from 741.477707? Then I am suppose to extract 5-4-0 from 740.203822 3 days later? Need more clarification.

Reply #91

emilyg — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:49:11 GMT

thanks

Reply #90

calabs — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:47:42 GMT

Nothing Em - You win some....you lose some. Backtesting the Lottery Bible shows periodic hits, with a lot of those straights. But they will not show every draw. It's hit or miss. That's my experience anyway.

Reply #89

emilyg — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:40:56 GMT

318 hit in ga. last friday 790 936 245 481 none of these showed up.

what am i doing wrong

Reply #88

paint1 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:34:20 GMT

Thanks to all of the above discussion, I have found that when a mirror such as 830 hits, go look up 830 in Tenaj's lottery bible and play that string of four numbers. One usually hits in 1 to 5 days. These four sets of numbers can be narrowed down with either tntea's vtrac's or the above method of playing highs or lows.

Reply #87

calabs — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:37:44 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Cashman87 on March 9, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by calabs on March 9, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by txpolo on March 9, 2006 Thanks Calabs, just when I started to

play # 7, midday for was 830.

Another mirrowed numbers.

Well txpolo, you can either continue with the original mirror, or start over with the new one, in this case 8,3. Backtesting in NJ didn't really make a difference in the hit ratio. Only when a mirror was waiting too long for one to re... [ More ]

Reply #86

pacattack05 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:33:21 GMT

Thanx tntea,

There seems to be a dry spell for my version of the PI method. In contrast, a quell of hits might be overdue just to balance things out.

Quell, is there even such a word?

She'll be comin around the mountain when she comes.....

Reply #85

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:07:32 GMT

It would be great....

Reply #84

pacattack05 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:00:57 GMT

But in all seriousness now, would it be hard to incorporate something like 7-10 systems based on their compatibility, and outcome?

I don't think it's really that hard.

The reason I ask this is because the time is now, and someone or a group must come out of the inner workings and the study of the numbers, victorious, and pleased with the results. PM each other or publicly display a team effort. Maybe Todd can possibly accomodate this grand endeavor. The imagination is endless, but it stil... [ More ]

Reply #83

pacattack05 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:47:12 GMT

Modified system: 1+1=?

Can anybody replace the question mark?

Clue: The obvious is not the answer. LOL

Second clue: Einstein proposed this question.

The winner will receive many blessings from me and my staff.

You may take the blessings all at once or once a month for 275 months. LOL

It really dosen't matter because when someone plays, we all win.

LOL......

Reply #82

Cashman87 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:17:07 GMT

Well, I find it best to continue looking for triggers with the mirrors you already have.

Maybe doing the opposite.... letting go of 'stale' mirrors ....may increase your win % for the time....but, a streak of losses can bury you...especially since you are skipping stale mirrors, which can be adding to your wins, to average out to the 89% hit rate.

Say you get draws like this....

318, 924 you would look for a trigger from either 9,4 and 8,3, don't just follow one.... [ More ]

Reply #81

retxx — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 04:12:45 GMT

I will try again

Reply #80

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 03:51:44 GMT

it wouldn't open

Reply #79

calabs — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 03:23:54 GMT

Well txpolo, you can either continue with the original mirror, or start over with the new one, in this case 8,3. Backtesting in NJ didn't really make a difference in the hit ratio. Only when a mirror was waiting too long for one to re-appear (say over 6 or 7 draws) does it go stale . I would then start over and wait for the next mirror trigger. This increased my % of wins. Make sense

Reply #78

retxx — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:58:30 GMT

tntea hope you looked at the chart I sent you on vtracs for pick 4 in Mass. Any ideas yet?Thanks

Reply #77

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:39:51 GMT

Right now I am making the most with the pick 4.. playing st.. playing vtracs.. Todd has added the vtrac page to LP which is very useful.

I have notice many things with the result page, that I was missing with the old pencil and paper.. lol

When the other tools are available.. I am sure we will be rocking..

I am working on some things for straight hits with Vtracs pick 3 now that it does take so long to get the boxes..

Check out the page... I am sure you will see the patterns and ho... [ More ]

Reply #76

Cashman87 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:34:08 GMT

Well no, but, in the past, when I used to post in the pick 3 forum alot....I posted numbers that all came from my family secret.

I've never really posted it's working...I mean, don't take any offense, just like to keep it, in the fam . Only because if I reveal that, I'd be revealing how I make my living.....just a little personal that's all. :)

But I have NO problem whatsoever sharing the numbers I play.....all anyone has to do is ask, or...just give me a chance to post them,... [ More ]

Reply #75

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:15:06 GMT

Thanks for clearing this confusion up for me..

Have you explained the family secret somewhere.. I must have over looked it.. I would like to look at it and see if vtracs can be used with it.. Thanks..

Reply #74

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:13:34 GMT

I am looking closely at this method to see how I can use it with the vtracs..

Have you checked out the vtrac page?

Seems you have good insight with the lottery numbers..

for some reason I thought you were new to this game.. maybe not. but you sure have a good eye..

Reply #73

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 02:12:18 GMT

Thanks for the reply..

I have been back checking TN.. and looks like if a mirror falls..

say 368

and next draw is 128 .. the next number would be low.. So that was what I was referring to..

Reply #72

Cashman87 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:46:40 GMT

No, doubles like....99, or 00, or 22, don't count as mirror triggers.

But, that situation....where 469 fell, and then 401 came next....401, contains 4, which is the mirror of 9, and is a low number. So, that would have been a loss, because since 4 is a low number, you'd play the lows. And 900, is high.

Reply #71

Cashman87 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:44:44 GMT

Sorry, ignore this tntea. lol. This was my response to xavier when him, pac, and I were talking about the pi method and my family secret. That has nothing to do with the enhancement to pac's pos system.

This topic is confusing because it contains my enhancement and the pi method discussion. lol.

Reply #70

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:33:32 GMT

Wed, Jul 28, 2004 2-8-3

Tue, Jul 27, 2004 0-8-2

Mon, Jul 26, 2004 9-0-0

Sun, Jul 25, 2004 4-0-1

Sat, Jul 24, 2004 4-6-9

With this example.. 469 .. fell on SAT

the (4) came back on Sun.. So you would play HIGH right.. and 900 fell the next day..

However, 00 fell.. I wouldn't use doubles are mirrored right.. Thanks for your help..

Reply #69

tntea — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 01:25:53 GMT

The most you'll be playing is 18 numbers at a time. With 500 to 1 payouts offline, and 900 to 1 payouts online, seems worth the money. (Cashman Said)

I am now confused.. Where do you come up with the most being 18, if you are playing highs.. (above 500) or lows (below 500

Reply #68

txpolo — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:48:25 GMT

Thanks Calabs, just when I started to

play # 7, midday for was 830.

Another mirrowed numbers.

Reply #67

Cashman87 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 23:23:38 GMT

Hey, you got it right calabs.

:)

Only thing, is, that it doesn't matter where the mirror trigger digit falls. Meaning, wether it's first, middle, or last....just as long as it falls.

Example.

946 is drawn. You now look for 9,4 mirror triggers.

Say.....319 is drawn. Well, the first digit is low....but, the trigger, 9, which is the mirror of 4, is high, so, you would play the 500 highs for the next drawing.

Only time you pay attention to the fir... [ More ]

Reply #66

calabs — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:43:01 GMT

txpolo - Well yes and no - you play the smaller number if the smaller number falls first. To follow the rule, if the 2 fell first, then play the low 500 numbers. If 7 falls, you play the high 500 numbers. Now this was almost completely the opposite for NJ when it came to mirrors 0,5. I'd say about 90% of the time, it went against the rule, so when 0 fell first, a high number fell, and when 5 fell first, a low number fell. I assume there will be exceptions to any rule, so monitoring the stat... [ More ]

Reply #65

txpolo — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:22:51 GMT

Thanks Calabs, my understanding was to use the smaller

number from the mirrow numbers, in this case it is a

2. However you gave me an idea since the 2 came out,

I will use the 7. Its to late to play the Midday draw so

I will play it on the Evenig draw.

Later

Reply #64

calabs — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:09:34 GMT

txpolo - Sorry for the typo in my last response to you

It should have read look for either the 7 or the 2, not 8. Typing way to fast for my fingers!!! To clarify, the 7 and 2 are the mirrors of each other. To repeat what Cashman stated earlier, the mirrors are:

0, 5

1, 6

2, 7

3, 8

4, 9

Sorry if this caused any undue confusion

Reply #63

emilyg — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:08:08 GMT

thanks

Reply #62

calabs — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:05:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by emilyg on March 9, 2006 calabs

ga. had 838 tues. 110 last night do i still use the 838??

Emily - Go from draw to draw, not mid to mid or eve to eve. So it depends on what fell WED; mid. If either a 3 or 8 did NOT fall midday yesterday, then keep with the 838. I see that 563 fell midday today, so for evening tonight you play the 500 low numbers because 3 hit. If 8 fell first, then you would play the 500 high numbers. Make sense?

Cashman/pac - please j... [ More ]

Reply #61

emilyg — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:31:36 GMT

calabs

ga. had 838 tues. 110 last night do i still use the 838

Reply #60

calabs — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:21:51 GMT

txpolo - I believe you do it this way: When 728 fell, look for either the 7 or the 8 in the upcoming draws. When 032 fell, the very next draw you play numbers 000-499 because the lower number of the mirror came out.

Reply #59

txpolo — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 17:12:36 GMT

Cashman87,

From the number 728 I used the 2 as my number. The 728 was drawn Midday

03/07/06. Last night the number drawn

was 032. Is the play over? If so are there any other play(s) you can suggest, while

waiting for mirrow numbers?

Thanks a Mil

Reply #58

calabs — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 13:31:45 GMT

Well, 057 fell in NJ last night. Looking for either 0 or 5 to trigger high/low numbers. Still looking at filters that may reduce that 500 number! That IS a lot of dig's. Based on NJ only, filtering out the 0,5 mirror may be a good place to start. That is one mirror that has been very resistant to the rule.

Reply #57

truecritic — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 10:03:36 GMT

retxx

please explain the / between the 123 digit and Pi. Is it multiply or divide? thanks.

If you go to the beginning of this thread, you will see that Pac explains your question. I also showed an example and a link to even more examples, 1st post.

Once you try both dividing and multiplication, you will see for yourself which is correct. The symbols used for math on a computer are

Reply #56

truecritic — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 09:53:23 GMT

xavier102772

Not sure if you checked cashman's previous postings of many winners or not. But click Resources->Search for something. Click Username. Then type in his full screen name. He has had many winners.

...and you will also see the answer to your family secret question.

Reply #55

xavier102772 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:54:33 GMT

cashman: I'm totally not trying to rag on you or anything. Though it seems like I made some incorrect assumptions. My bad. However, seeing how I haven't found a system yet to produce the type of result you're getting, if you wanna swing your method(family secret or key) my way, I'd be ok with that.

Reply #54

Cashman87 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 05:02:07 GMT

The key I was referring to is to the pi method.

The pos cash flow is different.

Reply #53

retxx — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:29:39 GMT

let me say that since I cannot afford to play cashmans way being retired I will stay naive and wait for pacattack to explain the formula he discussed as I would rather play a reduced amount of numbers and win a small amount to keep playing as a hobby rather than as a gamble. So if pacattack would be so kind to P.M. me if he would like I would be a happy camper.

please explain the / between the 123 digit and Pi. Is it multiply or divide? thanks.

Reply #52

Cashman87 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 03:14:56 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by pacattack05 on March 8, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by xavier102772 on March 8, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Cashman87 on March 8, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by pacattack05 on March 8, 2006 What you're forgetting is that not everyone is all of a sudden going to know how to remote view. Only a handful, and I mean a handful of people at this very moment know how to correctly remote view. It takes many months if not years to become proficient.

So far only he,... [ More ]

Reply #51

pacattack05 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:43:46 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by xavier102772 on March 8, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Cashman87 on March 8, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by pacattack05 on March 8, 2006 What you're forgetting is that not everyone is all of a sudden going to know how to remote view. Only a handful, and I mean a handful of people at this very moment know how to correctly remote view. It takes many months if not years to become proficient.

So far only he, his sister and just maybe a dozen or so of his students,... [ More ]

Reply #50

Best Picks — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 02:29:59 GMT

Is MO lining up for a P.O.S enhancement

3/5 888 m 760 e

3/6 992 m 603 e

3/7 464 m 918 e

3/8 299 m 138 e

it looks to me that evening is because 3 high digits 1st place and mirror 3,8

it looks like midday might swing the middle place digit to low

Is this correct

Reply #49

xavier102772 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 01:55:39 GMT

caashman: 15 straight hits in a month, hmmmm. So how many combinations do you have to play to get those 15 straight hits? I assume it's too many, since you're still hanging around here and not retired off the "key" or your family secret. Would those be correct assumptions?

pacatttack: I wouldn't believe Mr Donohue about how many people can actually RV pac. I think it is far more than a few dozen. I think I know a few dozen myself from one of the sites I visit. As well there are varying... [ More ]

Reply #48

pacattack05 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 01:01:18 GMT

I know the key to the formula. And it is dangerously close to my family secret.

Will you share the secret?

Leave off some parts if you want, as to not give away the whole sheh-bang. LOL

Reply #47

payne — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:55:52 GMT

Hi Cashman, I'm sorta feeling you on the RV thing. The key you are referring to is the pos cash flo key or this pi thing? Does anyone get up 15 straight wins per month? In Va, I would be happy with just one at $5000. I guess I'm just a low achiever

Reply #46

Cashman87 — Thu, 09 Mar 2006 00:13:09 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by pacattack05 on March 8, 2006 What you're forgetting is that not everyone is all of a sudden going to know how to remote view. Only a handful, and I mean a handful of people at this very moment know how to correctly remote view. It takes many months if not years to become proficient.

So far only he, his sister and just maybe a dozen or so of his students, and Ed Dame's students know how to remote view . But it's more difficult to RV numbers than places and things.... [ More ]

Reply #45

pacattack05 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:43:57 GMT

Thanx calabs, Yes I have thought about that. It's just that when you apply filters you can potentially take away the winning number.

But will do some light filtering perhaps. Feel free to add any filters that you might think are good. Show them to us though, it'll be interesting.

I'm thinking of putting about 10 systems all together and making one big system, sort of a filter I guess, because sometimes they can cancel out dead numbers. A long and tedious process. But well worth it. Maybe n... [ More ]

Reply #44

calabs — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:30:03 GMT

Of course! Where are my manners??

Thanks also to pac for starting the original ball rolling. Have gone through the next 6 months in NJ, and did not fair as well, but still turned a nice profit: 37 hits / 24 misses; $2800 profit in the second half of 2005. Would have been a real hair pulling six months however - it was a rollercoaster ride!!!! I know I may be screwing up the whole system by asking this, but have you considered applying filters to this method? It may reduce the number

Reply #43

pacattack05 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:23:59 GMT

What you're forgetting is that not everyone is all of a sudden going to know how to remote view. Only a handful, and I mean a handful of people at this very moment know how to correctly remote view. It takes many months if not years to become proficient.

So far only he, his sister and just maybe a dozen or so of his students, and Ed Dame's students know how to remote view . But it's more difficult to RV numbers than places and things.

Aaron himself said it took him a couple of years to acc... [ More ]

Reply #42

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:14:21 GMT

Well, basically, do you really think, that any pro gambler,.....or, put it this way, anyone that has something that works 100% is going to just reveal it, in it's exact, to millions?

Don't be so naive pac.

Reply #41

pacattack05 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:08:29 GMT

I would really love to know the source. Where did you get the idea that he is brainwashing me and a few million others. I'm not being sarcastic at all, I'm just curious.

Reply #40

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:05:36 GMT

Yes. Take a nap from trying to remote view numbers. LOL. It's messing your head up. I'm telling ya, that guy has you brain washed.

Remote viewing is NOT how he got the numbers for the formula. But, I can't force you to believe.

Reply #39

pacattack05 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 21:02:39 GMT

Either I'm just slow or dumb or both, but I've been reading your enhancment, and I can't really grasp it, with the mirrors and all. First I really don't know what the mirrors are.

If you can put the whole thing in a shorter and concise manner, maybe it might help me out. Maybe I should go back and re-read it.

Seems like some nice hits above. Thanx for your help.

Maybe I need a nap. LOL

Reply #38

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:55:52 GMT

Ofcourse. At times you'll be tracking a few mirror triggers at a time.

Just, never use the same mirror trigger to get more than one hit. Meaning, once you get a hit with that mirror trigger,....drop it, untill it gets drawn again.

Also, there are 2 things that were on my mind while creating this enhancement.

1, with pac's original approach, there weren't enough qulaifiers in a month to be in the game enough to really get an average winning percentage that will giv... [ More ]

Reply #37

calabs — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:36:27 GMT

One other thing I noticed about this system (at least in NJ), was that if a mirror occurs (say 4,9) and the 4 or 9 does not show up over the next 6-8 draws, it has a much lower probability to come up a winner. In that case, you can just look for the next mirror trigger and start over. Maybe the mirrors go stale after too many draws

Reply #36

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:32:08 GMT

No you haven't messed up.

Along with posting the enhancement, I basically relayed the whole positive cashflow system.

:)

But, yes, you have to play with this online. I'm more interested in just walking to the store, and putting a few hundred on a number that hits, than playing online. :)

But don't get me wrong, i do play online though.

Reply #35

calabs — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:30:32 GMT

Oh, sorry for any confusion. Yes, the enhancement you described Cashman using mirrors and playing low/high 500 straights. I'm not familiar with the original positive cash flow system. That might be where I may have messed up. But yes, this really does work. Sounds like you would have to play online to make a profit however. Playing $1 would be $500/draw. With a $900 hit for every straight would yield $400. So the breakeven point for say a given month would be 5 wins and 4 losses, if my b... [ More ]

Reply #34

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:30:03 GMT

Why are lows due today in idaho?

on fri mar 3rd, the number was 050 5,0 mirrors.

Then on sat. mar 4th, 930 was drawn, signaling to play lows on mar 5th (0 is the mirrow of 5, play lows since 0 is low), and then mar 6th, 305 was drawn. low....a win.

Now, where do you get to play low for today? mar 7th? Once you've used 050 to get a hit, then, you look for another drawing with 2 mirrors in it. Never use a drawing to get more than one hit. You'll run into more losses... [ More ]

Reply #33

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:24:33 GMT

Are you talking about my enhancement to pac's positive cash flow system?

:)

It's really something eh

Reply #32

calabs — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:20:38 GMT

This method is unreal!! I went through NJ for the first 6 months in 2005 and here's what I came up with:

Jan - 3 wins/1 loss

Feb - 7 wins/0 losses

Mar - 7 wins/2 losses

Apri - 5 wins/2 losses

May - 3 wins/3 losses

June - 4 wins/5 loses

Now what I relized when I was going through the losses was out of the 13 losses, 8 of them came from the 0,5 mirror. So when the rule said when 0 shows, play the 500 low straights, the high undoubtably showed. So by reversing the trend for... [ More ]

Reply #31

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 20:06:48 GMT

lol.

He has everyone brainwashed, I swear. There is NO remote viewing involved in finding the number to replace x with.

I am trying to tell you, he saids that so you will never find out what to really replace x with. You will not win every drawing. The formula is a method of predicting the future . Meaning, a method of predicting what will come up straight, in pick 3 or pick 4 in the distance. Your number can take days to come up. But as long as it's straight, it's definit... [ More ]

Reply #30

pacattack05 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:58:22 GMT

He claims that he will soon unleash the exact procedure on what the meaning of the formulas are, and how to use them. Unless someone here already knows. I'm all ears, cause I don'y have a clue, except for the original one x/pi+666. Unfortunately I would have to correctly remote view the number to replace x with.

Sun, Mar 5, 20069-7-7

For example: In order for me to have won on sun mar 5, with the winning number 977, I would have to have remote viewed the number 978 or 979 and replace t... [ More ]

Reply #29

retxx — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:09:55 GMT

ok now who is going to explain in plain english what the following formulas mean. adp001/210503 emd3 and next xx/p+cx/p-c(x+c)/p(x-c)/p

showing digits of 724 6 ways. Totally confused. Please clear this up for all novices.

Reply #28

txpolo — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 17:26:59 GMT

Thanks Cashman87

Reply #27

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:44:34 GMT

Well, If you're following my method, the other numbers in the drawing don't really make any difference.

:)

But, the use of multiple methods is your choice.

Reply #26

cps10 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:41:05 GMT

Cashman87

I just noticed something...DC came out with 4 9 in two consec draws with 4 coming out first...so your rule says take the lows. However, with the 2nd drawing, it came out 497, so I would be more inclined to take HIGHS because there are 2 highs in that number. Just a thought...

LOWS due in first drawing tomorrow: IDAHO

HIGHS due in first drawing tomorrow: CALIFORNIA, WEST VIRGINIA, TENNESSEE

Reply #25

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:12:38 GMT

:)

Nope, the place of the digits do not matter.

Just as long as they come up. 830, and 803 will work the same.

Meaning, if 803 came up, and the next drawing was 936, then play low for the next drawing.

If 830 came up, and the next drawing was 936, or any drawing with 3 in it, then play low for the next drawing.

And vice versa for tracking highs.

Reply #24

cps10 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:09:56 GMT

Cashman - it worked in NJ tonight...last night, 8/3 came up, 8 fell in NJ midday today and then 966 tonight, which would be the highs...not bad.

Now, let me ask you this - do digits matter? In other words, would 803 work the same as 830? Or would you have to specifically have to have the end digits? Never mind...I just saw that answer...LOL

Reply #23

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 04:05:50 GMT

If done right, you can make about $6k a month, with just playing $1 per number.

Your starting bankroll has to be about 5000 times the wager amount. So, if you are going to play $1 per number, which would equal $500 per drawing, you need to have a $5k bankroll. Easier way to see it is $500 x 10. Reason for this, is because, although you are winning an average of 89%....that 11% can stretch just as much as that 89% can stretch . And, just in case your first few times are not loosers... [ More ]

Reply #22

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:38:47 GMT

Alright, here's is the enhancement.

First, you wait untill you see a number that has it's mirrow in the same drawing.

Say, 803. 8 3 are mirrors.

So, what you do, is you wait untill either the mirrow of 8, or 3 appears in any following drawing. And, if that number is low, then you play the 500 numbers for a low first digit hit.

Example.

946 is drawn. So you wait untill you see the numbers 9 or 4 come up in any drawings. Eve and midd.

Say, the... [ More ]

Reply #21

Cashman87 — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:22:14 GMT

Give me a few guys, sorry....

My little 4 month year old just won't stop crying. lol

Reply #20

txpolo — Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:53:10 GMT

Cashman87, you're killing me.

Post it, please.

Reply #19

Cashman87 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 23:46:45 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by pacattack05 on March 7, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Cashman87 on March 7, 2006 Excellent observation pac, and NICE TO SEE YOU BACK MAN!

:)

I never got to tell you the enhancement I made on your positive cash flow system , I'll pm it to you in a few.

Anyway, what I wanted to say is that, that x/pi+666 formula is such a lure it's funny.

You see, that guy leaves out ALOT you need to know to make it work. It will take you a life... [ More ]

Reply #18

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:13:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by jordi marey on March 7, 2006 Pac so glad you are back and your pi system just may be that lottery grail we've been wating for. LOL

Thanx jordi, and I'm also happy. I'm so glad you mentioned this, because I believe that this tool is my last hope in making a living off the lottery. I truly believe this Aaron guy and despite his whacky beliefs of Satan and all that, I think he has proven himself time and time again.

He did it 11 times in a row in Japan, and 6 time... [ More ]

Reply #17

xavier102772 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:07:38 GMT

Mr Donohue sounds very far out to right field on PSI. Then again there are those that are very far in left field with god being the centre instead of Satan. Me, I believe PSI(RV, Telekinesis, Pre-cog, etc) are neatural and it just simply exists as a higher plane of consciousness that trascends the physical and is available to us all. And it's up to the individual to use it as they will, good, bad, religeous, or whatever.

pacattack: If you want some links to the sites that provide informa... [ More ]

Reply #16

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:05:59 GMT

Please do. I'll have to go back and look at what I posted on the Positive cash flow system. I forgot what it was...LOL

If you can also explain more about the phrases and names of the 14 kind, that would be appreciated. That sounds very interesting.

Reply #15

jordi marey — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:04:43 GMT

Pac so glad you are back and your pi system just may be that lottery grail we've been wating for. LOL

Reply #14

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:03:00 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by xavier102772 on March 7, 2006 pacattack: Pre-cognition can and does happen most often spontaniously when you aren't trained, mostly in the form or deja vous. But just like RV, Pre-cog can be trained and practiced so that you can do it at will. Just the same as all other PSI disciplines, it's a matter of practice, training and discipline. FYI: Pendling is one of the most effective forms of basic precognition and scrying and you can pretty much pick it up and uses... [ More ]

Reply #13

xavier102772 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:59:11 GMT

pacattack: Pre-cognition can and does happen most often spontaniously when you aren't trained, mostly in the form of deja vous. But just like RV, Pre-cog can be trained and practiced so that you can do it at will. Just the same as all other PSI disciplines, it's a matter of practice, training and discipline. FYI: Pendling is one of the most effective forms of basic precognition and scrying and you can pretty much pick it up and uses it right away to some effect. BTW: everyone has PSI poten... [ More ]

Reply #12

Cashman87 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:57:02 GMT

Well, I mind as well post mny enhancement here.

:)

I have to go out for a few, I'll post it when I get back.

Reply #11

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:56:16 GMT

Hey whassuuup?

I can't wait to see the modification of the pos cash flow. I almost forgot about that.

Where do you get the idea that it's not remote viewing, and why do you sound so sure? I haven't seen anything that resembles that theory. I would love to know the source, or is it just a gut feeling of yours?

The only reason I used the night before's number is because I don't remote view and I was just playing around, which actually yielded some close hits as you can see in the first pa... [ More ]

Reply #10

cps10 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:29:06 GMT

Cash - is there a new twist to the Pos Cash Flow system? I totally forgot about that system.

Reply #9

Cashman87 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:24:26 GMT

Excellent observation pac, and NICE TO SEE YOU BACK MAN!

:)

I never got to tell you the enhancement I made on your positive cash flow system , I'll pm it to you in a few.

Anyway, what I wanted to say is that, that x/pi+666 formula is such a lure it's funny.

You see, that guy leaves out ALOT you need to know to make it work. It will take you a lifetime to find out the key to that strategy. You can't just take the previous number, and put it through the fo... [ More ]

Reply #8

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:13:25 GMT

He dosen't say he uses precognition, but you could be right. It can be a combination. Precognition usually happens without trying. It comes to people when they least expect it. Atleast that's my interpretation of it. I've had it many times throughout my life, but without trying.

He claims it's an effect called a non-historical data reading. But it's done, as far as he says, through remote viewing.

I know I don't have to pay for it, but I always believe that you get what you pay for, or in... [ More ]

Reply #7

xavier102772 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 20:00:45 GMT

pacattach: Technically I'm thinking it's not really remote viewing when he finds the number, it's closer to pre-cognition. Remote viewing would be seeing what's in the room beside you without physically being there. And precognition is seeing a future event. Hmmm, I guess it may actually be a bit of both, but skewed closer to pre-cognition. Anyway, let us know how it goes. I for one am very interested. However, I'd be leary about him charging you to remote view. YOu can learn how to do it... [ More ]

Reply #6

fxsterling — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:53:07 GMT

Pi Day next week 3-14

Reply #5

JKING — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:41:24 GMT

You could always try the golden rule proportion (like in Cheops)...1.618 or a muliple thereof. I'm not sure the results would be any better.

Reply #4

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:59:04 GMT

He claims that he will soon explain in detail, exactly how it works. The only thing I can think of is that when he remote views the correct numbers to place in the equation, it will always be in the middle gound area. On the other hand, if he feels that he can't get a number during a session or many sessions, then he just skips that day and tries the next, and so on. Remember, he dosen't have to hit all the time to make a bundle.

He makes a living off the lottery, as he claims. He says one re... [ More ]

Reply #3

truecritic — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:37:25 GMT

Yes that was pointed out to me. However, take 000 as the example. And there are many more combinations.

Reply #2

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:21:12 GMT

truecritic

Standard Member

Michigan

United States

Member #22730

September 24, 2005

430 Posts

Online

Posted: March 2, 2006, 10:30 pm - IP Logged

I am not sure how that equation comes into play. Taking the numbers from his chart, as I posted previously, this is how the equation gets the answers he shows.

INTEGER(075/p +666) =690

Now consider these situations:

Using the lowest 3 digit number INTEGER(000/p +666) =666

Using the highest 3 digit number INTEGER(99... [ More ]

Reply #1

truecritic — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 18:03:04 GMT

You've given us another view of the puzzle. But that equation is flawed. It cannot mathematically come up with all numbers from 000-999. See this:

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/129454.htm

Also, for the fun of it - my use of p. Start at page 20 and backtrack to LOTTOMIKE'S original idea. My pick 4 missed by 1 digit, I think 3 times since being posted - LOL

(Of course you can read the whole thread if you want).

https://www.lotterypost.com/thread/129215p20.htm Jif says... [ More ]

PI method

pacattack05 — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 17:37:03 GMT

I was dabbling with pi, and saw some interesting results. I was able to see almost, straight hits, off by just one number, mostly in the first position. However, mostly for the following days to come, rather for the next day.

Draw Date Results

Mon, Mar 6, 20061-0-9

Sun, Mar 5, 20069-7-7

Sat, Mar 4, 20065-4-0

Fri, Mar 3, 20066-9-3

Thu, Mar 2, 20064-4-8

Wed, Mar 1, 20063-3-2

Tue, Feb 28, 20067-3-2

Take the number for feb 28. 732. Put the number in ascendin... [ More ]