Welcome Guest
Log In | Register )
You last visited December 6, 2016, 4:42 pm
All times shown are
Eastern Time (GMT-5:00)

PI method

Topic closed. 94 replies. Last post 11 years ago by cps10.

Page 1 of 7
PrintE-mailLink

United States
Member #17555
June 22, 2005
5582 Posts
Offline
Posted: March 7, 2006, 12:37 pm - IP Logged

I was dabbling with pi, and saw some interesting results. I was able to see almost, straight hits, off by just one number, mostly in the first position. However, mostly for the following days to come, rather for the next day.

Draw Date  Results 
Mon, Mar 6, 20061-0-9
Sun, Mar 5, 20069-7-7
Sat, Mar 4, 20065-4-0
Fri, Mar 3, 20066-9-3
Thu, Mar 2, 20064-4-8
Wed, Mar 1, 20063-3-2
Tue, Feb 28, 2006

7-3-2

 

Take the number for feb 28. 732. Put the number in ascending order from low to high...237.

The math: 237 divided by 3.14 = 75.477707

Then just add the number 666 to 75.477707 and you'll get 741.477707. Do you see the 977 5 days later?

How about the next day's results of 332?

233/3.14 = 74.2038217

Add 666 to 74.2038217 and you get 740.203822

Do you see the 540 3 days later?

This has happened more often than you think. I did a back test for about 2 months and there were a couple of time where the actual winning number came up. But mostly off by one.

Try this in your state. It might work more or less.

If I knew the number to multiply by pi, I would win every single day. This is how Aaron Donahue remote views the correct number to multiply by pi to win 6 times in a row, like he did by publicly ,forecasting his numbers the night before.

Since I haven't yet learned how to remote view, I simply used last night's number in ascending order. I will be taking courses online soon on how to remote view. Only about ten bucks a month.

The time now is 1815 and a reference is given as per MD3/ Evening 210503.

 

ADP001/210503 EMD3


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

724 896 -436 442 18
742 902 -430 448 24
274 753 -579 299 -125
247 745 -587 291 -133
472 816 -516 362 -62
427 802 -530 348 -76

 

Drawing Results Wed. May 21, 2003: 615



 




 

The time now is 1825 May 22, 2003.

 

Time 1833

ADP002/ 220503 EMD3


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

289 758 -574 304 -120
298 761 -571 307 -117
829 930 -402 476 52
892 950 -382 496 72
928 961 -371 507 83
982 979 -353 525 101

 

Drawing Results Thu. May 22, 2003: 864

 

The Michigan Daily 3 results for the evening of May 22, 2003 are 8,6, and 4 in this order.

The below posting represents the error that is common for those viewers determining a position for the number 9. As you can see the sum of 862 plus 666 divided by pi will give us a rounded number of 486.

I commonly make the error of inverting 6 and 9 as these symbols apart from their meaning, are identical in shape and size. As you learn how to remote view numbers, beware of the relative position of 9 and 6. Do not confuse these two numbers as I have done on this day.


a b c x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

2 8 6 286 757 -575 303 -121
2 6 8 268 751 -581 297 -127< br> 8 2 6 826 929 -403 475 51
8 6 2 862 940 -392 486 62
6 2 8 628 866 -466 412 -12
6 8 2 682 883 -449 429 5


a b c x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

2 8 9 289 758 -574 304 -120
2 9 8 298 761 -571 307 -117
8 2 9 829 930 -402 476 52
8 9 2 892 950 -382 496 72
9 2 8 928 961 -371 507 83
9 8 2 982 979 -353 525 101

 

As you study the graphs, note that the same position of 892 will yield the incorrect number of 496 as the number 862 yields the correct number of 486. Again the difference between 6 and 9 may seem slight to the viewer although the outcome is less than perfect.

A less than perfect outcome is not acceptable and this is why more than one session should be conducted to check for any error. You will in the future see a series of postings screening for any possible error.

The idea exists that one might observe only the numbers that match.

Modification of the formula can yield other numbers and a pattern of sequence can be recognized once the proper entrainment, skill, and environment of the viewer is achieved.

You are now observing a system of communication that will overcome all others presently known. It will be developed not in secrecy but here before us all.

-Aaron C. Donahue




 

The time now is 1730. It is Friday, May 23, 2003.

 

ADP003/ 230503 EMD3


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

328 770 -562 316 -108
382 788 -544 334 -90
238 742 -590 288 -136
283 756 -576 302 -122
832 931 -401 477 53
823 928 -404 474 50

 

Drawing Results Fri. May 23, 2003: 090




 

ADP004/ 240503 EMD3-R


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

567 846 -486 392 -32
576 849 -483 395 -29
657 875 -457 421 -3
675 881 -451 427 3
756 907 -425 453 29
765 910 -422 456 32

 

Here is something interesting. I am attempting to isolate within my completed data an exact number. The EMD-R postings are experimental. Now that it is the week-end holiday, why not?

 

ADP004/ 240503 EMD3-R

 

The next set of remote viewed numbers are 427 and 147. I will now compare these two sets with the previous number of 567.

Note any matching numbers.


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

427 802 -530 348 -76
472 816 -516 362 -62
247 745 -587 291 -133
274 753 -579 299 -125
742 902 -430 448 24
724 896 -436 442 18


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

147 713 -619 259 -165
174 721 -611 267 -157
417 799 -533 345 -79
471 816 -516 362 -62
714 893 -439 439 15
741 902 -430 448 24



 




 

Drawing Results Sat. May 24, 2003: 186



 

The time now is 1918, Sunday, May 25, 2003.

 

ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

453 810 -522 356 -68
435 804 -528 350 -74
543 839 -493 385 -39
534 836 -496 382 -42
345 776 -556 322 -102
354 779 -553 325 -99

 

This EMD3-H posting is an experiment revealing yet another way to access non-historical information.

 

ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H,E


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

453 810 -522 356 -68
435 804 -528 350 -74
543 839 -493 385 -39
534 836 -496 382 -42
345 776 -556 322 -102
354 779 -553 325 -99


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

42 679 -653 225 -199
24 674 -658 220 -204
402 794 -538 340 -84
420 800 -532 346 -78
204 731 -601 277 -147
240 742 -590 288 -136


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

176 722 -610 268 -156
167 719 -613 265 -159
716 894 -438 440 16
761 908 -424 454 30
617 862 -470 408 -16
671 880 -452 426 2

 

A third session is cued as reference to the second being a number that is known as historical data! The implications of this are profound.



 




 

Drawing Results Sun. May 25, 2003: 601

 

The Winning Michigan Daily 3 numbers for the evening of Sunday, May 25, 2003 are 6,0, and 1 in this order.

 

ADP005/ 250503 EMD3-H,E

x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

453 810 -522 356 -68
435 804 -528 350 -74
543 839 -493 385 -39
534 836 -496 382 -42
345 776 -556 322 -102
354 779 -553 325 -99

 

A second session cued for historical data produced 042 that in turn, produced the correct number.


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

42 679 -653 225 -199
24 674 -658 220 -204
402 794 -538 340 -84
420 800 -532 346 -78
204 731 -601 277 -147
240 742 -590 288 -136

 

This correct number was isolated as per a third session and the number 176 reveals -160, 16, and -16. These numbers match only one number from the previous graph of numbers. This number is -601.


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

176 722 -610 268 -156
167 719 -613 265 -159
716 894 -438 440 16
761 908 -424 454 30
617 862 -470 408 -16
671 880 -452 426 2

 

The implications of this are profound. A number that does not yet exist can be identified and therefore limited as historical information! There is so much more to show you.

-Aaron C. Donahue




 

The time now is 1923, Monday, May 26, 2003.

 

ADP006/ 260503 EMD3-H

 

Comment:

I have a strange set of experimental numbers today. This could mean a direct number is realized. We shall see...


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

954 970 -362 516 92
945 967 -365 513 89
594 855 -477 401 -23
549 841 -491 387 -37
495 824 -508 370 -54
459 812 -520 358 -66


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

951 969 -363 515 91
915 957 -375 503 79
591 854 -478 400 -24
519 831 -501 377 -47
195 728 -604 274 -150
159 717 -615 263 -161


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

851 937 -395 483 59
815 925 -407 471 47
581 851 -481 397 -27
518 831 -501 377 -47
185 725 -607 271 -153
158 716 -616 262 -162


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

951 969 -363 515 91
915 957 -375 503 79
591 854 -478 400 -24
519 831 -501 377 -47
195 728 -604 274 -150
159 717 -615 263 -161


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

851 937 -395 483 59
815 925 -407 471 47
581 851 -481 397 -27
518 831 -501 377 -47
185 725 -607 271 -153
158 716 -616 262 -162


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

462 813 -519 359 -65
426 802 -530 348 -76
642 870 -462 416 -8
624 865 -467 411 -13
246 744 -588 290 -134
264 750 -582 296 -128

 

As I have stated, these numbers are strange. I believe that we may have a direct number from the initial session. This is why I love to experiment with the formula. There is so much to learn!


-Aaron C. Donahue


Drawing Results Mon. May 26, 2003: 813

 

Whoa! The numbers are in. This EMD3-H cueing experiment produced some strange numbers worth a second look. I will try cueing this blind with another viewer to further understand what is going on here...

The winning Michigan Daily 3 numbers for Monday, May 26, 2003 are 8,1, and 3 in this order.


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

954 970 -362 516 92
945 967 -365 513 89
594 855 -477 401 -23
549 841 -491 387 -37
495 824 -508 370 -54
459 812 -520 358 -66


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

951 969 -363 515 91
915 957 -375 503 79
591 854 -478 400 -24
519 831 -501 377 -47
195 728 -604 274 -150
159 717 -615 263 -161


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

851 937 -395 483 59
815 925 -407 471 47
581 851 -481 397 -27
518 831 -501 377 -47
185 725 -607 271 -153
158 716 -616 262 -162


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

462 813 -519 359 -65
426 802 -530 348 -76
642 870 -462 416 -8
624 865 -467 411 -13
246 744 -588 290 -134
264 750 -582 296 -128


x x/p+c x/p-c (x+c)/p (x-c)/p

513 829 -503 375 -49
531 835 -497 381 -43
153 715 -617 261 -163
135 709 -623 255 -169
351 778 -554 324 -100
315 766 -566 312 -112

 

The numbers 462 and 513 are the result of the identical EMD3-H cueing as before. These numbers are used to isolate the correct numbers 813 and 831. Determining a correct pattern of sequence is possible with specialized cueing and a technique that I will share with you not now.

I am pleased with the result of today's experiment.

-Aaron C. Donahue

    truecritic's avatar - PirateTreasure
    Michigan
    United States
    Member #22395
    September 24, 2005
    1583 Posts
    Offline
    Posted: March 7, 2006, 1:03 pm - IP Logged

    You've given us another view of the puzzle.  But that equation is flawed.  It cannot mathematically come up with all numbers from 000-999.  See this:

    http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/129454

     

    Also, for the "fun of it" - my use of p.  Start at page 20 and backtrack to LOTTOMIKE'S original idea.  My pick 4 missed by 1 digit, I think 3 times since being posted - LOL 

    (Of course you can read the whole thread if you want).

    http://www.lotterypost.com/thread/129215p20.htm

    Jif says F10034-3A

    INTEGER (10034/p) = 3194 

    You putting Peter Pan up against that Pick 4? 


      United States
      Member #17555
      June 22, 2005
      5582 Posts
      Offline
      Posted: March 7, 2006, 1:21 pm - IP Logged

      Avatar

      Standard Member
      Standard Member

      Michigan
      United States
      Member #22730
      September 24, 2005
      430 Posts
      Online
      Quote truecriticReport Inappropriate ContentTop of pagePosted: March 2, 2006, 10:30 pm - IP Logged

      I am not sure how that equation comes into play.  Taking the numbers from his chart, as I posted previously, this is how the equation gets the answers he shows.

      INTEGER(075/p +666) =690

      Now consider these situations:

      Using the lowest 3 digit number INTEGER(000/p +666) =666

      Using the highest 3 digit number INTEGER(999/p +666) =984

      Do you see what happens?  If that equation is to be used to predict numbers, it has to be able to predict as low as 000 and as high as 999.  Yet it does neither.  666 is as low as it can go.  984 is as high as it can go.  So it isn't clear to me how he uses that whatsoever. 

      truecritic

      True, however there is juggling going on.

      For example, using a low 3 digit like 025.

      025/3.14=7.96178344 + 666 =673.961783......The 673 can be seen as 367 or 376. So it can be lower than 666. I'm still learning all the ways.

        truecritic's avatar - PirateTreasure
        Michigan
        United States
        Member #22395
        September 24, 2005
        1583 Posts
        Offline
        Posted: March 7, 2006, 1:37 pm - IP Logged

        Yes that was pointed out to me. However, take 000 as the example. And there are many more combinations.


          United States
          Member #17555
          June 22, 2005
          5582 Posts
          Offline
          Posted: March 7, 2006, 1:59 pm - IP Logged

          He claims that he will soon explain in detail, exactly how it works. The only thing I can think of is that when he remote views the correct numbers to place in the equation, it will always be in the middle gound area. On the other hand, if he feels that he can't get a number during a session or many sessions, then he just skips that day and tries the next, and so on. Remember, he dosen't have to hit all the time to make a bundle.

          He makes a living off the lottery, as he claims. He says one reason is because of the distraction of having to work a 9-5 job, takes away from the important things in life. I believe he is absolutley correct.

          Next week I'll be taking his online courses for only 10 bucks or so a month. His sister Jennifer, I think gives the classes.

            JKING's avatar - Kaleidoscope 3.gif

            United States
            Member #5599
            July 13, 2004
            1185 Posts
            Offline
            Posted: March 7, 2006, 2:41 pm - IP Logged

            You could always try the golden rule proportion (like in Cheops)...1.618 or a muliple thereof. I'm not sure the results would be any better.

            You are a slave to the choices you have made.  jk

            Even a blind squirrel will occasioanlly find an acorn.

              Avatar
              BILOXI, MISSISSIPPI
              United States
              Member #19651
              August 3, 2005
              621 Posts
              Offline
              Posted: March 7, 2006, 2:53 pm - IP Logged

              Pi Day next week 3-14

                Avatar
                Calgary
                Canada
                Member #9419
                December 7, 2004
                228 Posts
                Offline
                Posted: March 7, 2006, 3:00 pm - IP Logged

                pacattach: Technically I'm thinking it's not really remote viewing when he finds the number, it's closer to pre-cognition.  Remote viewing would be seeing what's in the room beside you without physically being there.  And precognition is seeing a future event.  Hmmm, I guess it may actually be a bit of both, but skewed closer to pre-cognition.  Anyway, let us know how it goes.  I for one am very interested.  However, I'd be leary about him charging you to remote view.  YOu can learn how to do it on your own for free from psipog.   


                  United States
                  Member #17555
                  June 22, 2005
                  5582 Posts
                  Offline
                  Posted: March 7, 2006, 3:13 pm - IP Logged

                  pacattach: Technically I'm thinking it's not really remote viewing when he finds the number, it's closer to pre-cognition.  Remote viewing would be seeing what's in the room beside you without physically being there.  And precognition is seeing a future event.  Hmmm, I guess it may actually be a bit of both, but skewed closer to pre-cognition.  Anyway, let us know how it goes.  I for one am very interested.  However, I'd be leary about him charging you to remote view.  YOu can learn how to do it on your own for free from psipog.   

                  He dosen't say he uses precognition, but you could be right. It can be a combination. Precognition usually happens without trying. It comes to people when they least expect it. Atleast that's my interpretation of it. I've had it many times throughout my life, but without trying.

                  He claims it's an effect called a non-historical data reading. But it's done, as far as he says, through remote viewing.

                  I know I don't have to pay for it, but I always believe that you get what you pay for, or in this case not pay for. His sister who teaches is supposedly, according to him, the best there is. If I can come anywhere close to mastering the techniques and getting a few hits here and there, it'll be worth the money.

                    Avatar

                    United States
                    Member #28973
                    December 26, 2005
                    439 Posts
                    Offline
                    Posted: March 7, 2006, 3:24 pm - IP Logged

                    Excellent observation pac, and NICE TO SEE YOU BACK MAN! 

                    :)

                     

                    I never got to tell you the "enhancement" I made on your "positive cash flow system", I'll pm it to you in a few.

                     

                    Anyway, what I wanted to say is that, that x/pi+666 formula is such a "lure" it's funny.

                     

                    You see, that "guy" leaves out ALOT you need to know to make it work.  It will take you a lifetime to find out the "key" to that strategy.  You can't just take the previous number, and put it through the formula and get the winning number.  It doesn't work that way.  You have to do some things to the number first before you even think about putting it through the formula.  And, that's what he leaves out.  Maybe it's because he doesn't know what to do with it....or maybe, because he really does, and just wanted to post something that "looks" smart, just to draw attention.

                     

                    But, that formula, if you know how to use it, is dangerously close to my whole "family secret" thing I'm always talking about.  :)

                     

                    Anway, just wanted to post this before alot of time is spent on this formula, and headaches are created because there isn't really anywhere you can go from here unless you know what to do with the number before you put it through the formula.

                    I assure you, regardless of what he saids, it's NOT remote viewing.  That's his way of keeping you from finding out what he REALLY does to the previously drawn number before putting it through the formula.

                    Now don't get me wrong....even not knowing what to do with the number before you put it through the formula can get you some hits, in the distance.  Maybe.  That's how powerful the formula is.  But, the numbers, as they are drawn, are how you say......"covers" for their real "personality".  I know it sounds crazy, but, it's true.  :)  Basically, every number, has about 14 or so personalities, and each of them can be converted to a "phrase".  Or "verb".  And you have to take that "phrase", or "verb" and convert it to it's "true" numerical value.  Which will not be revealed with just the drawn number.  This is not orthodox numerology, or theology, it's my imagination at work.  But, it's 100% effective.  It's what I use to do what I do.

                     

                    If someone can figure out what to do to the number before you put it through the formula, I will be HIGHLY impressed! 

                     

                    Good luck pac!  :)

                      cps10's avatar - Lottery-004.jpg
                      The Carolinas - Charlotte
                      United States
                      Member #21627
                      September 12, 2005
                      4138 Posts
                      Offline
                      Posted: March 7, 2006, 3:29 pm - IP Logged

                      Cash - is there a new twist to the Pos Cash Flow system? I totally forgot about that system.

                      The North Carolina Education Lottery - so much a joke that here are their mascots:

                      Stooges


                        United States
                        Member #17555
                        June 22, 2005
                        5582 Posts
                        Offline
                        Posted: March 7, 2006, 3:56 pm - IP Logged

                        Excellent observation pac, and NICE TO SEE YOU BACK MAN! 

                        :)

                         

                        I never got to tell you the "enhancement" I made on your "positive cash flow system", I'll pm it to you in a few.

                         

                        Anyway, what I wanted to say is that, that x/pi+666 formula is such a "lure" it's funny.

                         

                        You see, that "guy" leaves out ALOT you need to know to make it work.  It will take you a lifetime to find out the "key" to that strategy.  You can't just take the previous number, and put it through the formula and get the winning number.  It doesn't work that way.  You have to do some things to the number first before you even think about putting it through the formula.  And, that's what he leaves out.  Maybe it's because he doesn't know what to do with it....or maybe, because he really does, and just wanted to post something that "looks" smart, just to draw attention.

                         

                        But, that formula, if you know how to use it, is dangerously close to my whole "family secret" thing I'm always talking about.  :)

                         

                        Anway, just wanted to post this before alot of time is spent on this formula, and headaches are created because there isn't really anywhere you can go from here unless you know what to do with the number before you put it through the formula.

                        I assure you, regardless of what he saids, it's NOT remote viewing.  That's his way of keeping you from finding out what he REALLY does to the previously drawn number before putting it through the formula.

                        Now don't get me wrong....even not knowing what to do with the number before you put it through the formula can get you some hits, in the distance.  Maybe.  That's how powerful the formula is.  But, the numbers, as they are drawn, are how you say......"covers" for their real "personality".  I know it sounds crazy, but, it's true.  :)  Basically, every number, has about 14 or so personalities, and each of them can be converted to a "phrase".  Or "verb".  And you have to take that "phrase", or "verb" and convert it to it's "true" numerical value.  Which will not be revealed with just the drawn number.  This is not orthodox numerology, or theology, it's my imagination at work.  But, it's 100% effective.  It's what I use to do what I do.

                         

                        If someone can figure out what to do to the number before you put it through the formula, I will be HIGHLY impressed! 

                         

                        Good luck pac!  :)

                        Hey whassuuup?

                        I can't wait to see the modification of the pos cash flow. I almost forgot about that.

                        Where do you get the idea that it's not remote viewing, and why do you sound so sure? I haven't seen anything that resembles that theory. I would love to know the source, or is it just a gut feeling of yours?

                        The only reason I used the night before's number is because I don't remote view and I was just playing around, which actually yielded some close hits as you can see in the first page.

                        You say it's not remote, yet he claims that he will announce the exact procedure shortly. So in essence, he will come out say something totally different? I don't know about that, but we'll see. 

                        He also claims that he met Satan himself, and he is the father of humanity. He also says that the angels are the evil ones who created religion in order that mankind would have wars over it. He says that through remote viewing angels were supposedly to serve mankind, and that in order for them to keep the real truth, and keep power amongst themselves from people they created religions. He proports that Satan will be coming very soon to straighten out the whole thing.

                        Kind of whacky, I know.

                          Avatar

                          United States
                          Member #28973
                          December 26, 2005
                          439 Posts
                          Offline
                          Posted: March 7, 2006, 3:57 pm - IP Logged

                          Well, I mind as well post mny enhancement here.

                           

                          :)

                          I have to go out for a few, I'll post it when I get back.

                            Avatar
                            Calgary
                            Canada
                            Member #9419
                            December 7, 2004
                            228 Posts
                            Offline
                            Posted: March 7, 2006, 3:59 pm - IP Logged

                            pacattack:  Pre-cognition can and does happen most often spontaniously when you aren't trained, mostly in the form of deja vous.   But just like RV, Pre-cog can be trained and practiced so that you can do it at will.  Just the same as all other PSI disciplines, it's a matter of practice, training and discipline.  FYI: Pendling is one of the most effective forms of basic precognition and scrying and you can pretty much pick it up and uses it right away to some effect.  BTW: everyone has PSI potential and any discipline can be learned.  Some are naturals and just instinctively "know" how to use it.  As for everyone else, it can be learned, and depending on your natural talents, you will excel at one or another above the rest.  Though, I think practice is the great equalizer.  The more you practice one the better you will become.     


                              United States
                              Member #17555
                              June 22, 2005
                              5582 Posts
                              Offline
                              Posted: March 7, 2006, 4:03 pm - IP Logged

                              pacattack:  Pre-cognition can and does happen most often spontaniously when you aren't trained, mostly in the form or deja vous.   But just like RV, Pre-cog can be trained and practiced so that you can do it at will.  Just the same as all other PSI disciplines, it's a matter of practice, training and discipline.  FYI: Pendling is one of the most effective forms of basic precognition and scrying and you can pretty much pick it up and uses it right away to some effect.  BTW: everyone has PSI potential and any discipline can be learned.  Some are naturals and just instinctively "know" how to use it.  As for everyone else, it can be learned, and depending on your natural talents, you will excel at one or another above the rest.  Though, I think practice is the great equalizer.  The more you practice one the better you will become.     

                              Well that's a new one on me. I didn't know you can train to be precognitive. That's interesting, I'll have to look into that one.

                              Thanx for the heads up.