United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
ok now who is going to explain in plain english what the following formulas mean. adp001/210503 emd3 and next xx/p+cx/p-c(x+c)/p(x-c)/p
showing digits of 724 6 ways. Totally confused. Please clear this up for all novices.
He claims that he will soon unleash the exact procedure on what the meaning of the formulas are, and how to use them. Unless someone here already knows. I'm all ears, cause I don'y have a clue, except for the original one x/pi+666. Unfortunately I would have to correctly remote view the number to replace x with.
Sun, Mar 5, 2006
9-7-7
For example: In order for me to have won on sun mar 5, with the winning number 977, I would have to have remote viewed the number 978 or 979 and replace them with the variable x above in the formula.
978/3.14+666=977.464968....see the 977 or
979/3.14=666=977.783439.....still 977.
Although he dosen't necessarily have to have it in straight form. He has demonstrated that he can get a remote viewed number and box them and then apply the 6 boxed combos to the formula.
For example:
If I remote viewed the number 356, I would play, like he did all 6 way combo, like 356,365,536,563,635,653.
Since I wouldn't know which one I would use I would put all six combos in the formula. Fortunately for the purpose of this example 356 is the right combo.
356/3.14+666=779.375796
I will then take the 779 and play all three way combos straight for a hit. 779,797,977
Of course, because I didn't know ahead of time which of the six combos to use, I would have to play all combos of the six.
356,365,536,563,635,653. Then whatever numbers I would get out of each one, once gone through the formula, I would then have to play each result all six ways, or if it's a double, then all 3 ways.
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
lol.
He has everyone brainwashed, I swear. There is NO remote viewing involved in finding the number to replace x with.
I am trying to tell you, he saids that so you will never find out what to really replace x with. You will not win every drawing. The formula is a method of "predicting the future". Meaning, a method of predicting what will come up straight, in pick 3 or pick 4 in the distance. Your number can take days to come up. But as long as it's straight, it's definitely worth it.
But, if you don't believe me, I can't stop you from buring your brain out trying to "remote view" the number.
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
This method is unreal!! I went through NJ for the first 6 months in 2005 and here's what I came up with:
Jan - 3 wins/1 loss
Feb - 7 wins/0 losses
Mar - 7 wins/2 losses
Apri - 5 wins/2 losses
May - 3 wins/3 losses
June - 4 wins/5 loses
Now what I relized when I was going through the losses was out of the 13 losses, 8 of them came from the 0,5 mirror. So when the rule said when 0 shows, play the 500 low straights, the high undoubtably showed. So by reversing the trend for 0,5 mirror ONLY, the wins account for 42 with only 5 losses. Now wouldn't that just happen to be 89% wins. Amazing!
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
This method is unreal!! I went through NJ for the first 6 months in 2005 and here's what I came up with:
Jan - 3 wins/1 loss
Feb - 7 wins/0 losses
Mar - 7 wins/2 losses
Apri - 5 wins/2 losses
May - 3 wins/3 losses
June - 4 wins/5 loses
Now what I relized when I was going through the losses was out of the 13 losses, 8 of them came from the 0,5 mirror. So when the rule said when 0 shows, play the 500 low straights, the high undoubtably showed. So by reversing the trend for 0,5 mirror ONLY, the wins account for 42 with only 5 losses. Now wouldn't that just happen to be 89% wins. Amazing!
Are you talking about my enhancement to pac's positive cash flow system?
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
Cashman87
I just noticed something...DC came out with 4&9 in two consec draws with 4 coming out first...so your rule says take the lows. However, with the 2nd drawing, it came out 497, so I would be more inclined to take HIGHS because there are 2 highs in that number. Just a thought...
LOWS due in first drawing tomorrow: IDAHO
HIGHS due in first drawing tomorrow: CALIFORNIA, WEST VIRGINIA, TENNESSEE
Why are lows due today in idaho?
on fri mar 3rd, the number was 050 5,0 mirrors.
Then on sat. mar 4th, 930 was drawn, signaling to play lows on mar 5th (0 is the mirrow of 5, play lows since 0 is low), and then mar 6th, 305 was drawn. low....a win.
Now, where do you get to play low for today? mar 7th? Once you've used 050 to get a hit, then, you look for another drawing with 2 mirrors in it. Never use a drawing to get more than one hit. You'll run into more losses that way.
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
Oh, sorry for any confusion. Yes, the enhancement you described Cashman using mirrors and playing low/high 500 straights. I'm not familiar with the original positive cash flow system. That might be where I may have messed up. But yes, this really does work. Sounds like you would have to play online to make a profit however. Playing $1 would be $500/draw. With a $900 hit for every straight would yield $400. So the breakeven point for say a given month would be 5 wins and 4 losses, if my back of envelop calcs are correct.
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
Oh, sorry for any confusion. Yes, the enhancement you described Cashman using mirrors and playing low/high 500 straights. I'm not familiar with the original positive cash flow system. That might be where I may have messed up. But yes, this really does work. Sounds like you would have to play online to make a profit however. Playing $1 would be $500/draw. With a $900 hit for every straight would yield $400. So the breakeven point for say a given month would be 5 wins and 4 losses, if my back of envelop calcs are correct.
No you haven't messed up.
Along with posting the enhancement, I basically relayed the whole positive cashflow system.
:)
But, yes, you have to play with this online. I'm more interested in just walking to the store, and putting a few hundred on a number that hits, than playing online. :)
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
One other thing I noticed about this system (at least in NJ), was that if a mirror occurs (say 4,9) and the 4 or 9 does not show up over the next 6-8 draws, it has a much lower probability to come up a winner. In that case, you can just look for the next mirror trigger and start over. Maybe the mirrors go "stale" after too many draws!
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
Ofcourse. At times you'll be tracking a few "mirror" triggers at a time.
Just, never use the same mirror trigger to get more than one hit. Meaning, once you get a hit with that mirror trigger,....drop it, untill it gets "drawn" again.
Also, there are 2 things that were on my mind while creating this enhancement.
1, with pac's original approach, there weren't enough qulaifiers in a month to be in the "game" enough to really get an average winning percentage that will give you a profitable edge.
2, pac's original method had you going against streaks of lows, or highs, that can last for more than 4-6 drawings, and this enhancement has to going with them as much as possible.
Thanks for the gratitude calabs and txpolo, but, if anyone really wants to spend their gratitude from hits this enhancement gets them, it's best evenly spread (probably more for pac) between I and pac. Although I created the enhancement, the original idea came from pac. So, it's both of our sneaky minds that created this thing. lol
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
Ofcourse. At times you'll be tracking a few "mirror" triggers at a time.
Just, never use the same mirror trigger to get more than one hit. Meaning, once you get a hit with that mirror trigger,....drop it, untill it gets "drawn" again.
Also, there are 2 things that were on my mind while creating this enhancement.
1, with pac's original approach, there weren't enough qulaifiers in a month to be in the "game" enough to really get an average winning percentage that will give you a profitable edge.
2, pac's original method had you going against streaks of lows, or highs, that can last for more than 4-6 drawings, and this enhancement has to going with them as much as possible.
Thanks for the gratitude calabs and txpolo, but, if anyone really wants to spend their gratitude from hits this enhancement gets them, it's best evenly spread (probably more for pac) between I and pac. Although I created the enhancement, the original idea came from pac. So, it's both of our sneaky minds that created this thing. lol
:)
Either I'm just slow or dumb or both, but I've been reading your enhancment, and I can't really grasp it, with the mirrors and all. First I really don't know what the mirrors are.
If you can put the whole thing in a shorter and concise manner, maybe it might help me out. Maybe I should go back and re-read it.
Seems like some nice hits above. Thanx for your help.
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
Yes. Take a nap from trying to remote view numbers. LOL. It's messing your head up. I'm telling ya, that guy has you brain washed.
Remote viewing is NOT how he got the numbers for the formula. But, I can't force you to believe. :)
I would really love to know the source. Where did you get the idea that he is brainwashing me and a few million others. I'm not being sarcastic at all, I'm just curious.
United States
Member #28,972
December 26, 2005
439 Posts
Offline
Well, basically, do you really think, that any pro gambler,.....or, put it this way, anyone that has something that works 100% is going to just "reveal" it, in it's exact, to millions?
United States
Member #17,554
June 22, 2005
5,582 Posts
Offline
What you're forgetting is that not everyone is all of a sudden going to know how to remote view. Only a handful, and I mean a handful of people at this very moment know how to correctly remote view. It takes many months if not years to become proficient.
So far only he, his sister and just maybe a dozen or so of his students, and Ed Dame's students know how to remote view . But it's more difficult to RV numbers than places and things.
Aaron himself said it took him a couple of years to accomplish that feat. So when he releases the workout, millions of people aren't all of a sudden going to know how to RV. As for me, it will take a few months just to learn the basics, and then a few years to refine the method in order to RV numbers. But I have to start somewhere. I think of it as my retirement plan.
United States
Member #27,049
November 26, 2005
40,273 Posts
Offline
Ofcourse. At times you'll be tracking a few "mirror" triggers at a time.
Just, never use the same mirror trigger to get more than one hit. Meaning, once you get a hit with that mirror trigger,....drop it, untill it gets "drawn" again.
Also, there are 2 things that were on my mind while creating this enhancement.
1, with pac's original approach, there weren't enough qulaifiers in a month to be in the "game" enough to really get an average winning percentage that will give you a profitable edge.
2, pac's original method had you going against streaks of lows, or highs, that can last for more than 4-6 drawings, and this enhancement has to going with them as much as possible.
Thanks for the gratitude calabs and txpolo, but, if anyone really wants to spend their gratitude from hits this enhancement gets them, it's best evenly spread (probably more for pac) between I and pac. Although I created the enhancement, the original idea came from pac. So, it's both of our sneaky minds that created this thing. lol
:)
Of course! Where are my manners??
Thanks also to pac for starting the original ball rolling. Have gone through the next 6 months in NJ, and did not fair as well, but still turned a nice profit: 37 hits / 24 misses; $2800 profit in the second half of 2005. Would have been a real hair pulling six months however - it was a rollercoaster ride!!!! I know I may be screwing up the whole system by asking this, but have you considered applying filters to this method? It may reduce the number of plays and potentially increase profit margin.