Sharing Winning Lottery System........

Reply #34

Kola — Tue, 09 May 2006 02:39:42 GMT

Hi Paurths. Well the things that will impact us the most to a large degree are in our solar system - the sun, the planets that revlove around it, and especially earthly events. Even if these dramatic earthly events were to occur, if your system is good it should reliably track variable pertubances. And if you figure that there is no such thing as time, and that everything is simultaneous, and not sequential, then all that has happened, is happening and will happen has already been figured into t... [ More ]

Reply #33

Kola — Tue, 09 May 2006 02:38:23 GMT

Yes Coin Toss, given the paradigm you illustrated, what you said its true. But its not

absolute. Yes, with our current set-up we are taught and it is structured that the

House, when all is said and done will keep possible profits, and the players will

lose. Thats one reality, and by only believing that you help to re-inforce it. the

House as Favorites can be trumped. Most people won't, because its hard, and thats

what the House expects. We are trained in this culture to be le... [ More ]

Reply #32

takeitez — Mon, 08 May 2006 21:06:18 GMT

meanwhile , for those of us on Earth, the 03 pair is 133 clicks out in New York tonight.

EZ

Reply #31

paurths — Mon, 08 May 2006 19:07:45 GMT

Should a lotteryplayer also take into account the events in the universe then?

I guess so, since you speak about the spacetime continuum.

An exploding star, at 1000 lightyears away or so, would have an effect on the numbers drawn?

Or a disruption in the gravitational force of a massive black hole?

Then i guess it's time to stop thinking that there will ever be a system , don't you think

Reply #30

Coin Toss — Mon, 08 May 2006 19:06:33 GMT

If a system calls for playing 220, 200, or even 50 tickets at $1 or 50 cents a pop, and if it does win it wins $40, the lottery has you right where it wants you.

There is no bet that can be made legally where the house does not have the edge, whether thee house is a caino, a racetrack, or a state lottery.

Every bet you make you are suppossed to lose, otherwise no body would be in the business of booking your action.

There is no such thing as a lock in any form of gambling, the only o... [ More ]

Reply #29

Kola — Mon, 08 May 2006 15:19:24 GMT

Hi Lotterybraker. Yes, I agree with you about the extreme effectiveness of multiple

repeating combinations, which really are symptoms or footprints of deeper forces

work. Ya know? You see the footprint, and not the shoe that made it. As far as the

pick 3/4 are concerned tracking these footprints or noticing the mutiple repeating

combinatios will get you far.

And Payne, as of yet no specific system is being referenced. Hopefull soon....Well, at

least the numbers. Happy Kru... [ More ]

Reply #28

payne — Mon, 08 May 2006 14:44:06 GMT

Did I miss something? What system are you referring to

Reply #27

lotterybraker — Mon, 08 May 2006 06:55:46 GMT

One day I am going to introduce all of you to The Law of Absolutely as it pertains to multiple repeating combinations ..which is why I do not believe in the law of probability when it comes to whole numbers..

Reply #26

Kola — Mon, 08 May 2006 06:10:03 GMT

I forgot. The only way that picking a winning number in a small pool can be trumped

is by way of some catacylsmic rift in the spacetime continuum. There would have to

be a critical mass event for time streams to deeply shift. Sorry for the Star Trek

Speak . Take for instance the devastating September 11th, 2001 event. I'm sure the

numbers were quite chaotic leading up to and after the event. But then again, the

whole system matrix would have been perturbed so the ordered cha... [ More ]

Reply #25

Kola — Mon, 08 May 2006 05:44:18 GMT

Thanks RJoh. And you don't even have to play as many as 200. You can it cut to

maybe 50 numbers and less and win every time. You can even use v-tracs as

possibel secondary filters or use other state signals, at least with the Pick 3. The Pick

4-more tenuous but doable. Anyway, Happy Crunching

Reply #24

RJOh — Mon, 08 May 2006 05:32:33 GMT

You right Kola. If you play all 220 possible box combinations every time, you will will win but you will lose money every time. With a pick3 game, it not that hard to win with so few possible combinations, the hard part is winning more money than you spend.

Now that you have the system, all you have to do to prove Coin Toss wrong is tweak it to make money. Good luck to you.

Reply #23

Kola — Mon, 08 May 2006 04:17:02 GMT

Hi ya doing Coin Toss. Yes its true that there is no system that will produce a winner

everytime, but only if you have used the same sytem to do all kinds of gambling. You

would have to tweak the system to suit the game, and then one could come up with

a system that will hit everytime. If the concept or theory is outside of one's paradigm

to concieve of it, then yes it cannot be done.

Now with Pick 3/4 you can win everytime...EVERYTIME Again, within a relatively

smal... [ More ]

Reply #22

Coin Toss — Sun, 07 May 2006 17:14:58 GMT

In the world of gambling, from casino table games to keno to lottery, there are some systems that may prodice a winner tonight or even for a few nights. There is no system that can produce a winner everytime, and if there was, there would be nobody booking the action, nobody to bet it with.

If you look at the books in the gambling secrion of a bookstore, pick up almost anyone on table games and by about page 6 you'll be saying, This guy is full of baloney, too. Most of those books are writ... [ More ]

Reply #21

Kola — Sat, 06 May 2006 16:43:13 GMT

After all that we have seen from the Pick3/4, you would have to agree that there is

no randomness to it. Its just an undiscovered pattern. If you look around you there

are patterns upon patterns, and there is a way to make any system work. It just

has its own heartbeat, and you have find how that works for that particular system.

If you stay extremely open you might for example be able to read tea leaves, cowry

shells, the root sum method, pi, high mathematics...It all can wor... [ More ]

Reply #20

four4me — Sat, 06 May 2006 15:24:12 GMT

Systems systems and more systems people have been trying to beat the lottery since it's inception. No system is 100% accurate. Some peoples systems get them in the ball park with 2 out of 3 and 3 out of 4 on a regular basis but to nail down all 3 or 4 straight on a regular basis just isn't happening.

No one will break the lotteries back they will never go out of business. Safeguards are in place to cut off a number when the payout threshold is reached.

As for sharing systems there are at... [ More ]

Reply #19

tntea — Sat, 06 May 2006 15:12:59 GMT

lol

lol

One man doesn't use play slips.. lol

Instead I type in the four numbers he is playing..

I then type them in for me too...

Reply #18

Raven62 — Sat, 06 May 2006 14:45:31 GMT

Don't worry: The State won't have any trouble raking in the dough ($$$)! Fifty per cent of the Money Collected goes directly to the State coffers and the other fifty per cent goes for prizes, so it's not likely that they'll go broke.

Reply #17

takeitez — Sat, 06 May 2006 12:51:39 GMT

On-line betting would be the first to notice a winng system. They pay 9-1 and would feel the trend first. They would drop their payout odds. If their payouts continue to increase, they would drop the game. They are in it only for the money. If you play only state odds you are being robbed anyway.

EZ

Reply #16

Blackapple — Sat, 06 May 2006 12:31:44 GMT

Good Idea Jap,.........

Voice on Tape:TNTEA your

mission,retrieve discarded betting slips from the lucky

Ardmore gents to be disclosed at the LP for analysis. As always, should you or any of your IM force be caught or killed,, the Secretary will disavow any knowledge of your actions. This tape will self-destruct in five seconds. Good luck, Tea

Reply #15

JAP69 — Sat, 06 May 2006 12:11:19 GMT

However, I do know there are some men here in Ardmore who would not dare share their winning system with anyone. They win every day or every other day.. They say,, every other day. but the funny thing is they are only seen in our store every other day with the winning tickets.. tickets they bought else where the day before.. (where they had been collecting money from tickets they bought at our store the day before that.. )

Someone that has a knowledge of pick 3 or pick 4 numbers can pret... [ More ]

Reply #14

Blackapple — Sat, 06 May 2006 11:59:29 GMT

Everyone must remember

that states perform pretests

so many accurate picks maybe

selected before actual game.

As long as the Commission can

influence the game , ballpark accuracy is only possible.

Reply #13

LANTERN — Sat, 06 May 2006 08:23:03 GMT

Many of us are of course working on this. As to sharing? Many of us have done a lot of that already and are still doing it.

Reply #12

Kola — Fri, 05 May 2006 23:47:55 GMT

Its interesting RJOh. I've found that playing the pick 3 is not too different than

playing the pick 4. Powerball or MegaMillions are also manageable. But I won't try

them yet. I get tired just thinking about the manual manipulation I'd have to go

through. I see the manipulations clearly though. But Whew, It would take me

forever to do itmanually. . I just take it as Pick games too...Just alittle more

strenuous to stay with all of its strings. I think if one plays the Pick 3... [ More ]

Reply #11

RJOh — Fri, 05 May 2006 23:21:35 GMT

I don't play the pick3 very often, I was going on the little experience I've had posting pick3 predictions which if you check my prediction statistics are better for the pick3 game than my favorites, the pick5 and jackpot games.

Reply #10

Kola — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:54:13 GMT

Yes Paurths a nightmare indeed! It would make me very reluctant to share. But posting numbers? Yeah, a whole bunch with deep pleasure...

Reply #9

paurths — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:49:17 GMT

What is the worst thing that might happen for someone who discovered a major winning system for, let's take, pick3?

(except for loss of life or anything like that...)

The nightmare would then be that the pick3-game would end.

Do you think the lotteries would still offer pick3 if they get their bankaccount kicked each and every day?

Unless one who invents this major winning system knows a few people with who she or he could share it with, and be absolutely sure they will keep it ver... [ More ]

Reply #8

Kola — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:42:23 GMT

Hey RJOh, yes those the hard core facts. Well, sort of. I t depends upon which paradigm you accept. I know for a fact that it is completely possibe to get the winning number in relatively small pool of numbers. If you implicitly accept those stats it going to be very hard transcend them. I give you my word that those stats don't completely hold up.

Reply #7

RJOh — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:35:36 GMT

The odds of any system being accurate for the pick3/4 games is 1:1000 and 1:10000 or .01% and .001%, the dream of any system being 100% accurate isn't even a realistic dream. To break even and literally break the bank a system would only have to be correct 2:1000 or .2% of the times for a pick3 game. What do you think a system that was correct 1:100 or 1% of the time would do? In most state sponsored pick3 games that would be a $2500 for every $500 worth of tickets.

Reply #6

Kola — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:33:10 GMT

Hmm...Good Point Tntea. But with this winning system you would get tons of straight hits, because its a 100% accurate system

Reply #5

Kola — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:29:48 GMT

Yeah Millions Wanted I've been 'kinda' thinking the same thing. I would really like to give back to all those people whose posts I peeped to start me on my way. But full disclosure only after winning whole lot.

Reply #4

tntea — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:26:45 GMT

If too many people were using it for straight hits..

Reply #3

Kola — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:21:43 GMT

May bea bit naive of me , but do you think The Pick3/4 would go out of business if a super-winning system was shared

Reply #2

MillionsWanted — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:20:59 GMT

When I feel I have won enough money to support myself for the rest of my life, I might share my system with the rest of the world. Hypotetically speaking of course.

Reply #1

tntea — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:16:25 GMT

No one should feel obliged to share any method they have pieced together from other methods.

However, I do know there are some men here in Ardmore who would not dare share their winning system with anyone. They win every day or every other day.. They say,, every other day. but the funny thing is they are only seen in our store every other day with the winning tickets.. tickets they bought else where the day before.. (where they had been collecting money from tickets they bought at our store t... [ More ]

Sharing Winning Lottery System........

Kola — Fri, 05 May 2006 22:07:56 GMT

What are people's thoughts on the chance that one discovers a truly winning

lottery system that hits with a 100 hundred percent accuracy. Is he/she obliged to

share it with everyone especially after picking up loads of pointers from a whole

lotta smart people? Or maybe just generously post numbers and disregard the

inevitable call for full disclosure. Personally I lean lean toward the sharing. But I

wonder... if loads of peole got wind of this fictional super-winning technique wou... [ More ]