How about this?

Reply #22

CalifDude — Fri, 26 May 2006 16:55:53 GMT

Yes, 165. So you could bet 165 box numbers with 1 digit missing at 25 cents that would be $41.25 invested. A win would be $37.50 if no double or triple. Good Luck.

Reply #21

cps10 — Fri, 26 May 2006 16:50:43 GMT

JD

729 numbers would box into less than 220, right

Reply #20

CalifDude — Fri, 26 May 2006 14:58:57 GMT

My point exactly, John.

His list of less than 250 hits a box 98% of the time. My list of 220 hits 100% of the time.

I pointed out in another post that there are a lot of people that just don't understand numbers. Many of them don't even know about the 220 number list. Now, John, you have gone and broken the secret

Reply #19

CalifDude — Fri, 26 May 2006 14:54:44 GMT

Now you have completely ruined the 100% guarantee.

The guarantee is that if the number you don't play does not hit, you will win $225 ... GUARANTEED.

If you want a box in 120, then just play the 120 boxed unique numbers. That is the 220 without doubles and triples. Just play the 120 every draw. You will win every time there is NOT a double or triple.

Reply #18

cps10 — Fri, 26 May 2006 14:50:42 GMT

JD

I know what you mean, but couldn't you cut out the 6-ways into one number to reduce your cost of play? Same with the 3-ways? I guess what I'm saying is that instead of playing 729 numbers boxed, how many combos would you have if you just played 1 box of those 6 numbers? Would we be looking at a total of 120? 123?

I might be rambling

Reply #17

Atomic Dog — Fri, 26 May 2006 14:40:10 GMT

CD,

Is this your list of 220 numbers:

Results: 220

Tier 1

000 001 002 003 004 005 006 007 008 009 011 012 013 014 015 016 017 018 019 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 044 045 046 047 048 049 055 056 057 058 059 066 067 068 069 077 078 079 088 089 099 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 144 145 146 147 148 149 155 156 157 158 159 166 167 168 169 177 178 179 188 189 199 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229

Reply #16

CalifDude — Fri, 26 May 2006 14:33:11 GMT

Box up??? What does that mean? You can play them all box or all straight it doesn't matter because your payout will always be $225.00.

Reply #15

cps10 — Fri, 26 May 2006 14:31:32 GMT

CD

Wouldn't it be easier to just box up those 729 numbers that you are using? Seems like a lot less money out of pocket for roughly the same result? Just thinking out loud on a computer screen here...

Reply #14

CalifDude — Fri, 26 May 2006 02:25:50 GMT

I have a list of 220 numbers that hits every draw. Not a big deal!

I have not in the past worked much with pairs but I have recently developed a spreedsheet that counts the number of pairs in the last 26 draws then takes the top 10 and adds the last 6 digits drawn. I have not tested it enough to know if it is a winner.

Reply #13

Fibonacci — Fri, 26 May 2006 02:20:49 GMT

CD my brother Andy (Andy10475) have been using less than 250 numbers and in 98% of the times the winning number is in the list...as a box at least...see my NY list...daily...Since I started posting this long list (today it was less than 180 numbers-check it out)..I have never failed to have both morning and evening numbers on the list...

The secret to Pick3 is pairing...work with pairs and you only have ten digits to choose the final number...

Is there a prog that if you put in the pai... [ More ]

Reply #12

tntea — Fri, 26 May 2006 02:03:16 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LANTERN on May 25, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by amilby30 on May 25, 2006 i wish we were all sitting at a table with ,paper,pecils, and labtops we would have been cracked it

I thought that the pick 3 had already been cracked some time ago, by the LP lottery experts.

Oh there is a person here who claims to have cracked it..

they get bent out of shape when someone finds a method that provides 9 to 10 hits a week..

Reply #11

BarbaraAnn68 — Thu, 25 May 2006 14:46:35 GMT

C'Mon Friday. Barbaraann68

Reply #10

CalifDude — Thu, 25 May 2006 14:39:28 GMT

Thank you very much, Fernando. But after Friday's announcement by amilby30, I won't have to work on lotto methods anymore

Reply #9

LANTERN — Thu, 25 May 2006 07:37:52 GMT

I thought that the pick 3 had already been cracked some time ago, by the LP lottery experts.

Reply #8

LANTERN — Thu, 25 May 2006 07:34:34 GMT

Laverne

Hi!

Just wear a very long shirt, or wrap a blanket around you.

But, why show yourself?

Have the camera pointed at your picture instead or at anything else, but why a camera? A voice and a computer screen should be good enough.

As to beating the hell out of the lottery?, I thought that we were already doing well enough with that.

Reply #7

LANTERN — Thu, 25 May 2006 07:24:20 GMT

CD

Or you can filter out or leave out 1 digit per position, it does not have to be the same digit for all 3 positions.

CD, You already are very good at pick 3 prediction, few people do as well or as good as you do, whatever the proper word might be.

You just need to shift a little from box to straight same principles apply more or less, Don't be so shy, make the change. You can do it, box was not easy, it took a while, but you got it, now try straight, it won't be easy either and might... [ More ]

Reply #6

CalifDude — Thu, 25 May 2006 06:59:20 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Konformthismfs on May 24, 2006 I don't know CD. My view on betting is if you can't win at least 4x the bet when you win then it's not worth doing. And if you leave out the 1 number, there's still a chance you can lose.

The 4x would be a good strategy if you lost a lot, but with the method I am talking about, statistically you will win 90% of the time (you are using 90% of the digits). When you are winning that often, you don't need to win as much.

Yes, you w... [ More ]

Reply #5

LAVERNE MALONEY — Thu, 25 May 2006 05:13:12 GMT

Hello amilby30, I have been wishing wanting to be in that type of setting for a long time. It would be great to have a PC teleconference. One would not even have to get dressed, just make yourself presentable from the chest up. HAHAHA, LOL.

Reply #4

amilby30 — Thu, 25 May 2006 04:56:53 GMT

i wish we were all sitting at a table with ,paper,pecils, and labtops we would have been cracked it

Reply #3

CalifDude — Thu, 25 May 2006 04:47:41 GMT

Yes, I know!! I have been sorta just cruising along waiting for Friday.

Reply #2

amilby30 — Thu, 25 May 2006 04:39:40 GMT

friday you can increase that profit the cure is on the way

Reply #1

Konformthismfs — Thu, 25 May 2006 03:56:03 GMT

I don't know CD. My view on betting is if you can't win at least 4x the bet when you win then it's not worth doing. And if you leave out the 1 number, there's still a chance you can lose.

How about this?

CalifDude — Thu, 25 May 2006 03:26:54 GMT

The method that Kola has been showing got me to thinking.

That method gets a box almost every time by playing all 640 numbers.

If you wheel 9 digits, you get 729 combinations that have all the combos out of the 1000 that don't contain the 1 digit you left out. You might want to leave out the oldest or maybe the digit that has hit the least, I don't know.

You play all 729 combos for $0.25 BOX. If the digit you left out hits, you lose your bet of $182.25.

But, if it does not hit,... [ More ]