Population & Lottery Secret...

Reply #17

Rip Snorter — Sat, 24 Jun 2006 03:16:08 GMT

I agree

Reply #16

justxploring — Fri, 23 Jun 2006 07:07:22 GMT

Reply #15

bellyache — Fri, 23 Jun 2006 00:20:14 GMT

I honestly don't think most people would let their system out if they found a way to crack the lottery.

Reply #14

BobP — Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:14:51 GMT

I do believe it is possible to ride a winning streak with Pick-3 long enough to cash in big and get out. That would be a winning system. It shouldn't be impossible to work out when to play and not to play a sizeable chunk of numbers with a money management system to carry you over dry spells.

With Pick-5 and Pick-6 I believe every system relies on a big dose of pure luck to carry it beyond the math guarantee we get plugging the lines into a wheel tester.

Posted with all due respect fo... [ More ]

Reply #13

kios — Wed, 21 Jun 2006 04:33:23 GMT

can you please link me or repost your system vantage

Reply #12

Rip Snorter — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:22:37 GMT

There is absolutely no system that can beat the lottery....mano to mano....on any singular draw, except playing every single combination and you better have one huge jsckpot and hope you are the only winner.

You might well be right. However, you might as easily be wrong. Most of the world would certainly agree with you. If the numbers settle the question by tallying votes, you're definitely on the winning side.

There is one way to consistently beat the system without spending a fortune... [ More ]

Reply #11

Shane3 — Tue, 20 Jun 2006 14:02:01 GMT

There is absolutely no system that can beat the lottery....mano to mano....on any singular draw, except playing every single combination and you better have one huge jsckpot and hope you are the only winner.

There is one way to consistently beat the system without spending a fortune....I am talking about at least three or four times a year, getting 5 of 5....but that requires the system to be honest. if the system is dishonest then you may have to spend a little bit more than you want to and

Reply #10

Badger — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 23:53:19 GMT

And mexico, 11th most populated country in the world.

That may be out of date information. I think half of them are here now.

Reply #9

Rip Snorter — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:12:38 GMT

Good fortune to you Pumpi.

I wish you success.

Jack

Reply #8

pumpi76 — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 21:04:43 GMT

Rip Snorter I do have another tactic/strategy that is looking promising. I tested it in one lottery like 4 years ago and it work. Is not about predicting numbers or about wheeling. Is about how the lottery works/behaves the way it select numbers. You can see it more in RnG's though. I have to test it other lotteries, but it should work for is about the idea/tactic not the numbers. I am so lazy whether to do it since you are talking about recording/analyzing the first 2 years of draws since the... [ More ]

Reply #7

Rip Snorter — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:52:00 GMT

Actually, RJOH, ignore isn't a strong enough word to describe how you and a number of other people respond when someone announces a winning system.

Ignore carries a somewhat passive connotation. I think anyone announcing a belief they had a winning system would be delighted to be ignored by you and your spiritual kinfolk and treated with some respect, treated with a wait and see attitude.

But you know, and I know that isn't what happens. It isn't what happened when LottoVantage made su... [ More ]

Reply #6

RJOh — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:14:06 GMT

When anyone claims to have a system that will beat the lotteries even if it's only once in a great while, most people are likely to ignore them unless they can prove it actually worked at least once. If the creator of a system won't spend time documenting how his system actually worked, while should anyone else? There are thousands of systems making the same claims and life is too short to test them all.

Reply #5

amilby30 — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 19:03:26 GMT

great points

Reply #4

LottoVantage — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:31:39 GMT

LottoVantage:

Well spoken, amigo.

You posted a system. You said it works. And you were pilloried for doing so by people who, while they believe they know a lot about lotteries, never tried your system. The assumption on the part of each of them was that they know entirely too much to allow the possibility of a system that works into their realities.

These detractors and ignorers weren't run-of-the-mill general lottery players. They are the creme de la creme of lottery players world... [ More ]

Reply #3

Rick G — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 14:29:09 GMT

There are no codes or secrets that will beat this game...that's why lotteries are flourishing, because they can beat the player hands down with the house advantage.

But that doesn't mean you can't beat the lottery. The right approach and a whole lot of luck for that single win that puts you into the profit zone is all it takes. A quick pick is as good a code or secret as thousands of hours studying the game.

I would rest easy on your worries about anyone cracking the lottery. You can be... [ More ]

Reply #2

Rip Snorter — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:55:45 GMT

Reply #1

LottoVantage — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:43:30 GMT

Pumpi76, you make a fine hypothetical point about systems that are going to produce (only) the exact numbers everytime, and everyone on earth is going to select them and play them all at the same time. Yeah right! This ain't ever going to happen, guaranteed! I have posted a system here on LP that does work when followed and utilized as suggested, but not everytime. The majority of people are going to ignore any system that requires any steady observation, decision, and action on their part. So,... [ More ]

Population & Lottery Secret...

pumpi76 — Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:38:06 GMT

Guys if you had the secret to crack the lottery will you tell the whole world?I don't think i would, even if i wanted deep inside. The lottery will run dry. I was just looking at wikipedia at country's population and my gosh, there is too many people. I know not everyone bets, but still just 1 percent of any of this countries and i don't think the lottery will make it. I was looking at Nigeria and you should see their population. Is smaller than the size of texas yet they have 6 times Tx populat... [ More ]