LottoVantage update

Reply #36

LottoVantage — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:29:39 GMT

Thanks, Todd...

Lock it

Reply #35

Todd — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 01:06:10 GMT

That was very classy of you, apology accepted. If it's OK with you, I'll lock this thread.

Reply #34

Raven62 — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:58:16 GMT

LottoVantage,

When viewing your Blog: Instead of the SetPath-5 System I now see:

ohiorollingcash526.gif&width=106&height=150&ext=gif&mode=none&key=632881646524678625

texascash517.gif&width=106&height=150&ext=gif&mode=none&key=632880435415266890

Has something happened to your Blog

Reply #33

LottoVantage — Sun, 16 Jul 2006 00:31:40 GMT

Todd, I'm sorry if you were offended by the way I tried to get your attention for my work to be recognized. I saw comments by you on the forums concerning others work and felt that my work was significant enough for your comments. I appologize for the way it was handled.

Best to you,

LottoVantage

Reply #32

Todd — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:55:00 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by LottoVantage on July 15, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Rip Snorter on July 15, 2006 LottoVantage:

Have you thought through what you're trying to accomplish on this thread?

It can't be self-vindication with the membership, because nobody on the membership has accused you of anything, thought anything negative of you.

You appear to have some differences with Todd, but those can be handled in private between the two of you, or dropped and forgotten.

I don... [ More ]

Reply #31

LottoVantage — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 22:36:00 GMT

Yes mam...

Reply #30

Kidzmom — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 21:14:19 GMT

Come on people! I come here to get ideas and support not bickering- I can get that with my sisters on a good day. PMs should be kept as PMs . Let's have some constructive feedback. I feel that everyone who creates a system has worked really hard on it and presenting it to the LP family is an accomplishment for them. Who knows, one of them could be the one to win. BUT we have to view them in our own time because some of them are more complicated than others. Since we finally started the lot... [ More ]

Reply #29

RJOh — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 20:03:28 GMT

psykomo writes:

..........can you post 5 numbers

from a 5 number POOL........for a JACKPOT?????? for GA or TN ??????????

PSYKOMO would appreciate any HELP or positive ENERGY >>>>>>>>

Which do you want? 5 numbers or a 5 number POOL or both

Reply #28

LottoVantage — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 19:50:35 GMT

Sorry about this mess Jack, I do apologize to any members that are offended or thought they were being targeted by any of this, they weren't. Lottery Post is a great pastime for me and I have met some great folks here, including you, my friend. It needn't go any further, what has been said has been said. If anything has been accomplished here, then admonishment lies in the beholder. Consider it done and over with as far as I'm concerned.

Best to you,

LottoVantage

Reply #27

psykomo — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:34:35 GMT

LottoVantage:

Logged back in for a second.....................................................................

after posting my attempt to pick 5/5 numbers from a pool of 12 numbers,

please note.........................best I could do was 4/0 from this pool for GA-

FAN5 numbers. When I started, over a month ago, QBJECTIVE was to get

a pool with 10 numbers too include 5/5, so I could wheel the jackpot from

this group ??????????????? CAN you POST a 10 number pool, 8 number

Reply #26

RJOh — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:43:37 GMT

For me posting at LP is a part of my recreational pursuit of playing the lotteries. I enjoy posting my thoughts as much as reading the thoughts of others on the subject but I don't expect or want any follow-up beyond what is posted in the public forum. When I do get PMs, I respond privately but I have no desire to make my recreational pursuit a project that involves other people, their opinions or their systems. I think there are other members that feel the same way and I respect that.

Reply #25

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:06:02 GMT

LottoVantage:

Have you thought through what you're trying to accomplish on this thread?

It can't be self-vindication with the membership, because nobody on the membership has accused you of anything, thought anything negative of you.

You appear to have some differences with Todd, but those can be handled in private between the two of you, or dropped and forgotten.

I don't recall whether it was Woolsey, when he was Archbishop of Canterbury, or Sir Thomas Moore, or maybe even Cromwell... [ More ]

Reply #24

stah — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 15:02:48 GMT

First, Todd thank you for this awesome site. I pop in with fair frequency, even if I don't post often. Without this site I would not have seen LottoVantage's idea. Second, thank you LottoVantage for the insight on the draws. I know I thought I was close to having a system several times, only to have it bomb. Yours, on the other hand is very viable and I plan on implementing the idea. Again, thanks guys.

Reply #23

LottoVantage — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:24:22 GMT

Quote: Originally posted by Todd on July 15, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by Rip Snorter on July 15, 2006 Quote: Originally posted by CalifDude on July 15, 2006 Two more people that I have to remember not to send anything private in my PRIVATE Messages.

Ain't it a fact?

J

Welcome to my world. I'm at the point where I have to explicitly say at the end of my private messages, Please do not share this with other people. Many times if I don't do that my PRIVATE Message gets copied and... [ More ]

Reply #22

Todd — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:09:49 GMT

Welcome to my world. I'm at the point where I have to explicitly say at the end of my private messages, Please do not share this with other people. Many times if I don't do that my PRIVATE Message gets copied and pasted all over the place.

Reply #21

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:47:58 GMT

Ain't it a fact?

J

Reply #20

Todd — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 11:28:37 GMT

LottoVantange,

Thanks for posting the latest PMs also. They show that you are unhinged, and that my responses to your have always been appropriate.

CalifDude, I never post the content of PMs, except in this case were Lotto Vantage took his private vendetta public, and started making false accusations on the forums. I'm not sure how LV could call my post of the PMs to be twisted , unless he's referring to his own words, of course.

LV, if you've been in this situation before, it says t... [ More ]

Reply #19

LOTTOMIKE — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:09:59 GMT

i'm not going to take sides on this but speak from experience........

as far as the pick 5 goes i got a tally of almost A HUNDRED 4 out of 5's since this year begin.that is a lot of 4 out of 5's.i was doing this every night on average sometimes two or three times a night.the fact is more people are interested in the pick 3,pick 4 and jackpot games.even when i was doing all this i might've gotten a couple PM'S but not a lot because the simple matter is the fact that the pick 5 is just not as p... [ More ]

Reply #18

LottoVantage — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:05:17 GMT

CD, since Todd decided to post a twisted version of our private messages, do you actually think it was unfair of me to defend what really transpired? I don't think so. I've been at the bottom of the bucket throughout this whole mess, you know, member verses administrator. But I've been there before through over 35 years of manufacturing management, and I'm sure of one thing, I'm just as prepared to defend myself as accurately and honestly as I ever have been.

Reply #17

CalifDude — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:47:48 GMT

Two more people that I have to remember not to send anything private in my PRIVATE Messages.

Reply #16

RJOh — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:34:55 GMT

All I can say is I'm glad I'm not a webmaster, sounds like being one involves more than just writing programs and maintaining the site.

Reply #15

LottoVantage — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 05:08:30 GMT

Well, since Todd chose to post private messages, then I feel the entire issue needs to be posted in it's entirety.

Previous Private Message

Sent By : LottoVantage

Sent : March 28, 2006, 12:00 pm

Todd, I have begun tracking NJ Cash 5 with my StatPath 5 system. Since, in my honest opinion, there is no other VIABLE system in existance available to track and predict pick 5 lotteries successfully, I thought you might be interested in previewing one system that does work. My StatPath 5 sys... [ More ]

Reply #14

Rip Snorter — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 04:25:28 GMT

Rick, Todd, LottoVantage, Gasmeterguy, everyone involved here:

I don't thing this is a matter of issues with Todd, so much as it's LottoVantage spending months or years putting a system together he believes in, offering it up, and getting no response from anyone, no interest.

Fact is, GasMeterGuy probably described it best .... at least he described himself, and gave a middling apt description of me when he said we're off doing out own things, trying to work our own systems out for winning... [ More ]

Reply #13

Rick G — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:01:59 GMT

Now I see what Todd is talking about. Let's back off and leave the man alone.

If you have something great then use it, share it, sell it or whatever you want to do with it but for the life of me I don't see what Todd has to do with it. He's only providing the site for you to say it. Without this site you'd be pissing against the wind.

Reply #12

Todd — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:29:10 GMT

Just so there is no confusion about this, and because I have been falsely accused by LottoVantage, here is the PM exchange that occured between he and I back in March. See how strange his comments above are? See how nice I was, and he didn't show any signs (at that point) that I said anything wrong?

THIS IS SO WEIRD!!!

The originial message from him is at the bottom, then my reply in the middle, then his final reply at the top.

LottoVantage

Platinum Member

Mid Ohio

Un... [ More ]

Reply #11

Todd — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 02:22:06 GMT

Dude, you have some real issues, and anyone reading the last half of that post can easily see it.

You sent me a PM asking me to review some system you wrote, and I sent you back a very nice message saying that I was heads-down writing new features at the time, and I couldn't spare the time I knew it would take to give your system a workout.

THAT WAS MONTHS AGO.

You need to think about what is going on inside you, that some guy you don't even know (me) doesn't have time to look at your s... [ More ]

Reply #10

GASMETERGUY — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 01:32:26 GMT

LottoVantage

I sincerely hope I can write this in the way that I feel and nothing comes out negatively. I do not wish to be negative. So here goes.

I am a follower of the P5 games only. Right now I feel that I am close to a solution that will work in Tennessee (I want to be correct once a year). While I am interested in ideas, I am not interested in someone else's system; not right now. If and when I give up on my efforts, then I will examine someone else's effort. Perhaps someday I... [ More ]

Reply #9

RJOh — Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:56:09 GMT

I think it's wises of Todd to avoid posting comments about member systems because a systems can be limited by the person using it and such comments could be taken personal. I read Todd comments about Stefan's tool and it was more about comparing one programmer efforts to create a pick3 tool to his own efforts to create a website (LP) than the merits of the tool. I don't play pick3 games so the tool had no value to me. I'm sure if LottoVantage post an image of a jackpot winning ticket won usin... [ More ]

Reply #8

emilyg — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:22:59 GMT

lottov - had this been for p3 - i would be all over it. take care of your health.

Reply #7

ram — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 23:11:21 GMT

LottVantage,I think you have quite a system and I found it pretty easy to understand once you cleared up a couple of things.At first I was a little unsure of what was happening but with each update you can follow the numbers and see where their came from.I can tell a lot of work went into it and I think it's as good as anything on the market and better than most.At this time my money is a little tight or I would be playing cash 5 more than I have.Anyway,great system....Ram

Reply #6

CARBOB — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 22:08:50 GMT

I think the reason you never got a more favorable response is because of the type of game, Pick 5. I only became interested with Pick 5 about a month ago. Just recently have I started looking at the game seriously. I don't have any stats handy to back up my statement, but I would guess Pick 3 is probably around 60% and Pick 4 around 30%. I don't recall ever reading one of your threads, because I was only interested with Pick 3 4. Lottolaugh's string threads really got me interested in Pick 5.... [ More ]

Reply #5

emtcee1973 — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:39:27 GMT

lottovantage,

i will give your system a shot...i always look forward to trying new things...i wish i had the vision of some of the people on this site...i really wish i can contribute something for people to use...i am recently an upgraded member here...did you remove this system from your blog??there are people who appreciate what you and others offer here, and i am one of them!!!so thanks, and the best of luck!!!!i wish we all could win a nuce big one

Reply #4

Rip Snorter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:26:12 GMT

I've got a test run going on the predictions page trying for a means to open a can of whupass on the bonus ball games. I'm middling committed to following through on it until Saturday draws are in.

But I might sneak in and see what I can do with NM on your system right away, or as soon as everything looks ripe after I've studied it some.

Thankee,

J

Reply #3

Rip Snorter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:15:59 GMT

Gracias.

Looking forward to giving it a test run.

J

Reply #2

LottoVantage — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:12:56 GMT

Thanks for the favorable reply, Jack.

Remember, all other statistics charts are organized numerically, mine aren't. This can cause inappropriate numbers to be displayed at the (middle) of the chart because of being in numerical order, instead of being there by statistical positioning, (how many draws back since being hit).

This can cause the wrong numbers to be positioned in both the upper tier group, and the lower tier group, right at the center of the chart.

Hope this helps,

Best t... [ More ]

Reply #1

Rip Snorter — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:49:58 GMT

LottoVantage:

I don't claim to understand why LP members haven't taken the time to look at your system, but now that I understand better what you're doing (I honestly couldn't understand the charts, earlier) I'm planning to use it.

Thank you amigo.

I wish you the best,

Jack

LottoVantage update

LottoVantage — Fri, 14 Jul 2006 20:15:39 GMT

To all those concerned why my postings have all vanished, to those who couldn't quite understand the StatPath 5 Lotto System, and to anyone else interested in knowing what it's like providing a viable and capable system and being totally ignored by management and membership.

Actually, the system is too simple, it's the statistical layout that is confusing to a new user. The whole thing is a statistical amplification of an anomaly which I recognized some time ago, which is:

1. Take a regula... [ More ]