Reverse Causation

Reply #11

paurths — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 17:27:30 GMT

Hi Lucky146,

i don't remember if that worked or not,

i just remember reading about it here at LP

cheers

Ricky

Reply #10

lucky146 — Tue, 25 Jul 2006 16:18:54 GMT

Coin Toss:

Thanks for the link - really enjoyed it.

paurths:

cool idea about sendeing the numbers from the future! I will give it a try (why not

Reply #9

Coin Toss — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 22:25:17 GMT

pacattack05

Yup, it was on the Coast to Coast website...just as an article, not as a recap of a previous show... but I'm sure that someone who was involved with that study has been, or will be a guest on the air.

paurths

Oh, those people hit a jackpot, but went on to blow it all, and now belong to the Jack Whtitaker Support Group for former jackpot winners.

Just kidding....

I've wondered about experimenting with universal consciousness though, but it seems you can't get peop... [ More ]

Reply #8

paurths — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 19:29:28 GMT

There is a thread here at LP where some people discussed something pretty familiar to this.

It must be over a year back, but no more than 2 years.

Anyway, if i remember correctly, there was this person that would, after the draw (i don't remember if it was pick3, pick4 or MM or so), speak out loud the winning numbers.

He would do this for a while,

then he started to focus, let's say during the week, one day or any day, on the fact that he was gonna speak out loud the winning numbers coming... [ More ]

Reply #7

KY Floyd — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:42:10 GMT

It's certainly an interesting idea, but that particular experiment is pretty trivial in the scheme of things. Besides being only a single experiment there's no way of knowing whether or not the results were actually influenced by the students. Using one photon to change the polarity of another photon faster than they can reach one another is far more intriguing, and much better evidence that much of what we believe isn't quite true. Perhaps it's also evidence that the universe in general is bala... [ More ]

Reply #6

Rip Snorter — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 16:03:36 GMT

It's just theoretical physics for the moment, backed in this case (so far as we know) by the single experiment described.

Decaying atomic particles are a far-cry from lottery-draw numbers. The article didn't seem to suggest otherwise.

J

Reply #5

MillionsWanted — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 15:26:52 GMT

So if I in the future trying hard to manifest some lottery money to myself in the past, I will win on the lottery now?

Ain't that smart

Reply #4

pacattack05 — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:57:06 GMT

You got this from Coast to Coast, right?

I saw it this morning....

Reply #3

nclottoplayer — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 06:16:32 GMT

anyone who understands the way numbers work certainly know there is credibility to this theory at least in part, maybe not in the same way everyone understands it or interprets it, but i can give you hundreds if not thousands of examples of how a future lottery number, will predict something that will happen prior to it, thus, in a sense affecting the past.

its still presents a problem with lottery numbers though because as in a game like powerball, there are just too many outcomes, and to... [ More ]

Reply #2

Coin Toss — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 04:45:11 GMT

Oh good, I was hoping you'd see this one J, glad you did.

Reply #1

Rip Snorter — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:32:15 GMT

Excellent article. Thanks for the link Coin Toss

J

Reverse Causation

Coin Toss — Mon, 24 Jul 2006 02:36:59 GMT

Lottery Discussion gets a lot more views than Mystical so I'm intentionally putting this here so more people will see it.

Stumbled across this article on a website and it made me think about the possibillities of this affecting lotteries, even if they were just remote.

Some pretty heavy stuff....

Click on Cause and Defect in blue below....and when you go to the linkbe sure to read Numbers in Limbo

Reverse Causation'

Can the future influence the past? A group of physicists met... [ More ]